2013 Cubs Projections: Ian Stewart and Luis Valbuena

<strong><a target=Our 2013 Cubs Projections series continues with a look at 3rd base. The starting job is Ian Stewart's according to Dale Sveum, which leaves Luis Valbuena as a back-up, but even that job may be in question. It's hard to see both Valbuena and Brent Lillibridge making the roster.

I wrote a little bit about Ian Stewart a couple weeks ago when wrote about the four most likely to exceed expectations. Instead of rewriting what I already did, I'll just quote what I wrote then.

In 2003, Ian Stewart was picked in the 1st round by the Rockies (10th overall). After posting a .959 OPS in rookie league at the age of 18, Baseball America ranked him the top Rockies prospect, as well as ranking him 57th best in baseball.

The future only looked brighter for Stewart after the 2004 season in which he hit .319/.398/.594 in A ball at the age of 19. Baseball America rewarded him by ranking him the 4th best prospect in baseball. Only Joe Mauer, Felix Hernandez and Delmon Young were ranked higher in 2005.

Colorado hasn't had a hitter like Stewart in its system since Helton. Stewart punishes good fastballs and has the strength and hand speed to wait back and drive offspeed stuff. He has good plate coverage and learned to use the whole field during the season. He adjusted when SAL pitchers began throwing him junk, and did damage at both Asheville's cozy McCormick Field (.621 slugging percentage) and on the road (.568). Stewart has average speed, and he's a savvy and aggressive baserunner. While he fell short of his goal of a 30-30 season, he did steal 19 bases in 28 attempts. Defensively, he has an above-average arm. Along with his tools, Stewart has strong desire. He wants to be an all-star and a Gold Glove third baseman, and he's willing to do what it takes to get there. The Rockies rave about his work ethic and focus on team goals.

Stewart remained in Baseball America's top 50 propects each each year through 2008. He never fell off the map by performing poorly, but his OPS's the next three years in the low to mid .800s forced us to drop the high expectations earlier in his career.

His first three years a the big league level he had respectable wOBA's. The wRC+ was better than league average in his rookie season, but slightly below the following two years. He then hurt his wrist in 2011 and was horrible in nearly 150 plate appearances. He wasn't too good for the Cubs last season either.

He's now had surgery to fix the wrist and is reportedly healthy. We could easily see Stewart return to the .330-.340ish wOBA we saw before the injury. There's also the possibility of him even being better than that. He's always had tremendous talent and is an example of a highly ranked prospect who simply did not work out. Maybe the Cubs could get lucky.

Ian Stewart PA H 2B 3B HR BB SO avg obp slg wOBA
CAIRO 339 65 13 2 11 34 87 .216 .302 .384 .304
ZiPS 328 61 11 2 11 33 96 .210 .296 .376 .286
Average 333 63 12 2 11 34 91 .213 .299 .380 .295

CAIRO seems to think that he might be somewhat useful while ZiPS has him projected only slightly better than Alfredo Amezaga. He's projected to be average to slightly below average on defense and just slightly below average on the bases.

Here are his percentile forecasts.

Ian Stewart
% PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO GDP HBP AVG OBP SLG wOBA
80% 407 361 61 88 20 4 17 54 6 1 48 93 4 6 .243 .347 .463 .357
65% 373 331 52 76 16 3 14 46 4 1 41 91 5 4 .229 .324 .423 .330
Baseline 339 301 44 65 13 2 11 39 3 2 34 87 6 3 .216 .301 .382 .302
35% 305 271 37 55 10 1 8 32 2 2 28 82 7 2 .203 .278 .341 .275
20% 271 241 30 46 8 0 6 26 1 3 23 77 7 1 .189 .255 .301 .248

I had said that it's fairly easy to see him having a wOBA in the .330 range and that would be hist 65th percentile. I would not expect it. I'm thinking something around .300, but who knows how it ends up?

I don't want to spend too much time on Luis Valbuena's 2013 Cubs projections because he may not even make the team. I did find it interesting that both CAIRO and ZiPS project Valbuena to be the better player.

Luis Valbuena PA H 2B 3B HR BB SO avg obp slg wOBA
ZiPS 548 121 27 2 11 51 116 .247 .319 .378 .305
CAIRO 467 102 24 1 10 46 97 .245 .324 .381 .314
Average 508 112 25 2 11 48 107 .246 .321 .379 .310

To be fair, both PECOTA and Steamer project Ian Stewart to be better. I'd guess the average of their pojections if we included as many as possible would be about equal to one another. It would probably favor Stewart a bit, but not by much. Here are Valbuena's percentile forecasts.

Luis Valbuena
% PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO GDP HBP AVG OBP SLG wOBA
80% 560 502 71 135 35 2 16 80 7 2 63 105 7 6 .268 .363 .441 .358
65% 514 460 61 118 29 2 13 69 6 2 54 101 8 4 .256 .343 .410 .336
Baseline 467 418 52 102 24 1 10 59 4 3 46 97 9 3 .244 .323 .378 .314
35% 420 376 44 87 19 0 8 50 3 3 38 92 9 2 .232 .303 .346 .291
20% 374 334 36 74 15 0 5 41 2 4 31 85 10 1 .220 .283 .315 .269

It's kind of too bad that both of these guys hit right-handed. They'd probably make a pretty good platoon if one of them hit left-handed

Other 2013 Cubs projections

51 thoughts on “2013 Cubs Projections: Ian Stewart and Luis Valbuena”

  2. It’s kind of too bad that both of these guys hit right-handed. They’d probably make a pretty good platoon if one of them hit left-handed

    I knew what you meant, but I can’t resist an opportunity to use Inigo.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  8. @ Ryno:
    Isn’t that similar to how we’ll hear about players who may or may not be 100% healthy come draft time? I don’t even pay attention to the NFL, but I hear about it. It’s also common in the MLB draft. Sometimes it’s probably a legitimate concern, but sometimes it’s just thrown out there to lower a player’s signing bonus or to get a team that picks higher to pass.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  12. @ SVB:
    Not that I know of.

    “Pink Floyd chose the cow because it was the least psychedelic thing they could think of. ”

    “The cover to this album was chosen because people at the time had to much of a strong imagery with Pink Floyd as a space-rock band, so they tried conveying a different image. Waters told the producer to drive out to the country and photograph something “ordinary”. The cow was the result of this.”

    — no idea whether or not this is true

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  13. @ dmick89:

    There will be many varying reports about health leading up to the draft. Clemson DE Da’Quan Bowers (the guy who was caught with a gun in his carry-on at LaGuardia) was a top-5 talent going into the ’11 draft. Questions about his knees left him off several teams’ boards and pushed him down to the mid-second round.

    Unfounded rumors of drugs, crime and injury have probably changed most of the drafts, but I would think that any NFL team considering drafting a player today will trust their own evaluations.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  15. Ryno wrote:

    I would think that any NFL team considering drafting a player today will trust their own evaluations.

    That’s kind of what I’ve thought. Why would a team trust rumors at this point? Doesn’t make much sense.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  16. Just for fun, I’m going to do my all-draft-eligible team.

    Offense

    QB: Geno Smith, WVU
    RB: Eddie Lacy, Ala.
    WR: Cordarrelle Patterson, Tenn.
    WR: Keenan Allen, Cal.
    WR: Tavon Austin, WVU
    TE: Zach Ertz, Stan.
    LT: Luke Joekel, aggy
    LG: Jonathan Cooper, UNC
    C: Brian Schwenke, Cal
    RG: Chance Warmack, Ala.
    RT: Eric Fisher, CMU

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  19. 3-4 Defense

    WILL: Ezekial Ansah, BYU
    DE: Sharrif Floyd, Fla.
    NT: Jesse Williams, Ala.
    DE: Star Lotulelei, Utah
    SAM: Dion Jordan, Ore.
    MIKE: Manti Te’o
    TED: Kevin Minter, LSU
    CB: Dee Milliner, Ala.
    CB: Johnathan Banks, MSU
    FS: Kenny Vaccaro, Texas
    SS: Johnathan Cyprien, FIU

    If Georgia OLB were 100% cleared of injury, I might have him above Ansah.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  20. And the front 7 for a 4-3

    DE: Bjoern Werner, FSU
    UT: Sharrif Floyd, Fla.
    NT: Star Lotulelei, Utah
    DE: Ezekiel Ansah, BYU
    OLB: Arthur Brown, KSU
    MLB: Kevin Minter, LSU
    OLB: Alec Ogletree, Ga.

    I was tempted to be safe and put aggy DE Damontre Moore there, but I just have a feeling Ansah is going to blow up like Jason Pierre Paul. He’s a freak.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  21. dmick89 wrote:

    That’s kind of what I’ve thought. Why would a team trust rumors at this point? Doesn’t make much sense.

    Too many teams have been burned and there’s much more emphasis on the draft these days.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  22. Just so you know…

    Ezekial Ansah, Sr., DE/OLB, BYU
    6’5″, 274
    Ghana native who started playing football in 2011.
    Ran the 200m in 21.9 for BYU’s track team.

    With a good 10-yard split and cone time, I think Ansah moves into the top 10.

    And I’m going to make a bold prediction that Marquise Goodwin breaks Chris Johnson’s combine record in the 40.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  27. Ryno wrote:

    6’5″, 274
    Ran the 200m in 21.9 for BYU’s track team.

    As someone who used to coach track and run 200’s, this is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever read.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  43. Oh, my…

    http://boston.cbslocal.com/2013/02/20/time-for-baseballs-war-supporters-to-tone-down-the-arrogance/

    I agree in principle with the very last paragraph:

    We all don’t need to war over WAR (damn, those terrible cliches are just so hard to resist). You’re not right, I’m not right, and there’s not one individual statistic that is right. Much like the way last year’s AL MVP race played out, WAR can be a factor without being the factor. Unlike the statistic itself, it’s not very complicated.

    But I didn’t like the rest of it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  46. @ Rice Cube:
    The rest of it is pretty garbage. And you’re not gonna find too many people who a) think WAR perfectly measures performance or b) people who think it is the end-all of the conversation (in fact, I often argue that it’s a starting point, and you start digging from there). So I feel like that paragraph is the authors attempt to come off as even-handed/objective as well as hedge against the saber-backlash, but to me, it’s just a thinly-veiled strawman.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  47. I don’t see how Valbuena and Lillibridge both can’t make the roster. I fully expect both of them to be on the opening day roster.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

  50. Wonderful web-site, exactly where did you observed this details in this article? I am glad I found it. i will be checking out back soon to examine what other content it is possible to have.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *