Three Up
- Tyler Chatwood is having the best spring of any pitcher in the Cubs system. He had one walk in this first appearance, and hasn’t allowed a free pass since. In 3 appearances, Tyler has logged 8 innings with 8 hits and 5 strikeouts. I’m completely out on Chatwood in a rotation for the Cubs unless it’s an emergency, but I think there’s a path on a 25-man roster for a swingman like Chatwood. The obvious problem is we already have one of those, but maybe there will be a team that is watching Chatwood solve his problems (perhaps) and is willing to take even a little of his contract. I think Chatwood even after last season could have received a 2 year/$4 million “get well” contract so I’m not ruling out getting some relief from his contract. I haven’t watched him throw a baseball in spring, so for all I know it’s just luck, but Tyler literally did not have a stretch of 8 innings without walking at least 2 batters last season. I looked it up.
- The year is 2028. Kyle Schwarber has been out of the league for 5 years after never putting it together. President Trump Jr. is getting ready for his 2nd term. The world is ablaze. Deep in rural Indiana, there’s a haggard-looking man in a bunker, eating a cold can of beans. The man is me. All he does is mutter the words “Schwarber’s hitting .300/.400/.600 this season. Schwarber’s hitting .300/.400/.600 this season.” I like Schwarber more than some of his family members. Despite nearly 600 plate appearances screaming to the contrary, I still believe in Schwarber’s bat being among the most elite in all of baseball. At the risk of sounding stupid, Schwarber’s only real issue is his inability to make contact with pitches out of the strike zone. If he could figure out how to foul off a freaking pitch, his patience + power would play even more than they do now. It didn’t feel like it due to his struggles in high-leverage situations, but Schwarber hit .238/.356/.467 last year. He was a 3.2 fWAR player! Valuable on offense and defense! He’s absolutely murdering the ball in spring training right now. He has a .364 nOBP this spring training (nOBP is not On-Base Percentage).
- Kris Bryant is healthy again, and it is showing in his Spring Training. Two homers, lots of walks, few strikeouts. In the comments, dmick posited that Bryant’s positive regression is the most important factor for the Cubs next year, and I whole-heartedly agree. I guess I shouldn’t assume he’ll put up MVP-numbers in 2019, but I kinda do. Nobody ever said I wasn’t an idiot.
Three Down
- It doesn’t feel any better that Addison Russell is still on the Cubs. It’s maybe even unfair, but he’s sort of a totem of the shitty off-season the Cubs have had with all of the struggles to find money or people with a strong moral compass. I almost don’t even care how Russell is performing this year (he’s having a fine spring training) – it’s just a constant reminder of how baseball isn’t the escape that we want it to be.
- Ian Happ has 21 AB and is batting .143/.182/.190. That’s not great. On the one hand, who cares – it’s 21 meaningless at-bats. On the other hand, I’d obviously rather he actual reach base.
- Who is closing for the Cubs this year? One of the problems with this offseason is that we didn’t add to the bullpen, a clear need for this team. Unless you’re really high on Chatwood or Strop, there isn’t a clear answer to this question. I’m sure we’ll find someone there, but when Craig Kimbrel is out there waiting to be signed, it makes me angry that the Cubs are wondering if Xavier Cedeno can handle the 9th.
Baseball Prospectus’ playoff odds: 17.6%
Comments
If Nico breaks with Iowa, I’d be very surprised and excited.
mylesQuote Reply
myles,
I highly doubt that happens. You’d rather be forced to promote him early on than consider demoting him or trying to figure out if you should stick with him.
dmick89Quote Reply
Well, maybe they trade Bryant and use the cost savings to pay the concession workers.
mylesQuote Reply
Darvish with another really strong start in a sim game.
mylesQuote Reply
Wasn’t Chatwood fairly good last spring too? For some reason that’s about the only thing I remember about spring training last year.
dmick89Quote Reply
dmick89,
21.2 innings, 17 hits, 2 home runs, 11 BB, 1 HBP, 23 K
So a little better this season, but he’s probably just someone who I’d say is a good spring training pitcher. He’s pretty good when half the lineup of the other team is minor league guys.
dmick89Quote Reply
dmick89,
Iowa has found their ace.
MylesQuote Reply
Myles,
Maybe their number 2/3 starter. If Iowa doesn’t have at least one starter better than Chatwood it’s going to be a long season for the big league team.
dmick89Quote Reply
When I start thinking Chatwood might wind up being good, I know winter delirium has taken over. Bring on real baseball, please.
andcountingQuote Reply
Amen.
MylesQuote Reply
Chatwood 3 BB, 2 H in 1.1 IP. Welcome back, reality.
andcountingQuote Reply
At least two of the four runs he allowed were unearned (they scored on a wild throw by Chatwood).
Rizzo the RatQuote Reply
ODB -> CLE
Bell –> NYJ
Brown –> OAK
And most importantly, Dee Ford –> SF
RynoQuote Reply
Chatwood really needs to bail out Chatwood there. Hard to blame Chatwood for Chatwood sucking so much. That said, if Chatwood could throw a fucking strike, Chatwood wouldn’t have burned him in the first place.
MylesQuote Reply
Crazy.
MylesQuote Reply
(dying laughing)o(dying laughing)
MylesQuote Reply
Strop tweaked his hamstring (opposite leg from the injury last year).
Just go sign Kimbrel already.
PerkinsQuote Reply
Perkins,
Don’t tell me what to do.
berseliusQuote Reply
Guys, Brad Brach had mono in the offseason. The Cubs should get some useful innings out of him in 4-5 years, if they are lucky.
berseliusQuote Reply
RynoQuote Reply
berselius,
And where was Hayden Simpson when Brach got mono?
RynoQuote Reply
He’ll be in our spring training camp next year.
MylesQuote Reply
“there’s no way we can lose unless, of course, all nine bullpen pitchers fall victim to nine separate misfortunes and are unable to play. but that will never happen. three misfortunes, that’s possible. seven misfortunes, there’s an outside chance. but nine misfortunes? i’d like to see that!”
1. morrow
2. brach
3. cedeno
4. strop
5….
EnricoPallazzoQuote Reply
I think the Cubs should consider a position change for Chatwood. At least that way his incompetence would be entertaining.
dmick89Quote Reply
Hopefully the new position is beer vendor.
MylesQuote Reply
As a hitter, he has a lower career strikeout rate than Kris Bryant!
Rizzo the RatQuote Reply
Rizzo the Rat,
He’s got a decent chance of walking more than Baez if he’s given enough plate appearances so he’s obviously a superstar at the plate.
dmick89Quote Reply
So if I order a beer I can expect it to wind up in my kid’s lap?
andcountingQuote Reply
andcounting,
Depends on the spin rate.
dmick89Quote Reply
They actually made some CBA changes – most interesting is
berseliusQuote Reply
berselius,
I’m not that sold on three batter minimum, but I’d like to see a limit to how many pitchers a team can carry on its roster. That and a universal DH.
PerkinsQuote Reply
Is that still in play? I’d definitely be in favor of this. I remember when bullpens expanded to 6 and I thought that was crazy. Then it was 7 and now 8.
dmick89Quote Reply
Just wondering, what is the argument against the three-batter minimum? Are you concerned that it just isn’t going to accomplish anything? To me it seems like an effective way to both keep the game moving and also serve as a de facto limiter of the amount of pitchers that a team will carry.
EnricoPallazzoQuote Reply
Perkins,
I love the three better minimum. I don’t know that it’s necessarily better, but I like forcing teams to strategize differently than they always have. It gives every team opportunity to come up with advantages they can exploit. I think there should be a similar restriction on hitters, though. If the purpose is to speed up gameplay, shouldn’t there be a rule preventing a pinch hitter for the first batter faced? Or, if a pinch hitter is allowed, shouldn’t the originally announced batter count toward the minimum? Then make it so any batter who enters the on-deck circle counts as a batter faced if he is replaced with another hitter.
andcountingQuote Reply
Perkins,
Yeah, pitcher roster limits are part of it too, from the sounds of it. Though no specific details have been released. I would guess that this three batter minumum thing should implicitly cut down on that as well.
https://mlb.nbcsports.com/2019/03/14/mlb-mlbpa-to-announce-major-changes-early-cba-negotiations-today/
berseliusQuote Reply
I like this idea a lot.
berseliusQuote Reply
Tyler Chatwood is having the best spring of any pitcher in the Cubs system. He had one walk in this first appearance, and hasn’t allowed a free pass since. In 3 appearances, Tyler has logged 8 innings with 8 hits and 5 strikeouts. I’m completely out on Chatwood in a rotation for the Cubs unless it’s an emergency, but I think there’s a path on a 25-man roster for a swingman like Chatwood. The obvious problem is we already have one of those, but maybe there will be a team that is watching Chatwood solve his problems (perhaps) and is willing to take even a little of his contract. I think Chatwood even after last season could have received a 2 year/$4 million “get well” contract so I’m not ruling out getting some relief from his contract. I haven’t watched him throw a baseball in spring, so for all I know it’s just luck, but Tyler literally did not have a stretch of 8 innings without walking at least 2 batters last season. I looked it up.
MylesQuote Reply
Myles,
Didn’t he walk a bunch of dudes the other day?
berseliusQuote Reply
Two days ago.
dmick89Quote Reply
I think Chatwood would be a really good pitcher in AA. He’s still walk too many, but he’d make up for it with a lot of strikeouts and probably not give up many hits.
dmick89Quote Reply
I’d say there’s a 100% chance of Chatwood taking up a roster spot to start the year. There’s literally no way the Cubs just admit they blew that much money on a shitty player without giving him a chance to provide some value at the big league level. As bad as the Heyward deal has worked out, Chatwood is easily the worst signing by this front office. It was such a ridiculously terrible deal at the time that only allowed for luck to save their asses from looking stupid. Even worse, they jumped on him quickly when the market ended up taking forever to develop.
dmick89Quote Reply
i was just looking at chatwood’s bref page to double-check how much the cubs still owe him and i have some GREAT news. he’s set to make 12.5m this year and 13m next year but check this out: “2020 salary may increase up to $17m based on 2018 and 2019 All-Star selections or Cy Young voting”.
i think the cubs might be off the hook for 4m in 2020 you guys!
EnricoPallazzoQuote Reply
EnricoPallazzo,
I imagine that’s what kept the Cubs out of the running for Harper, the risk of Chatwood’s All-Star/Cy-Young bonus kicking in.
andcountingQuote Reply
Yes, like the day after I wrote it the first time
MylesQuote Reply
Myles,
You should keep your positive thoughts about Chatwood to yourself from now on. I blame you for jinxing him.
dmick89Quote Reply
Relievers already getting hurt, huh? Shame there isn’t a guy like Craig Kimbrel still on the market.
Fuck the Cubs.
mobile daveQuote Reply
mobile dave,
Tyler Chatwood’s contract literally prevents the Cubs from signing a good player like Kimbrel. Just another reason that contract was so horrible.
dmick89Quote Reply
dmick89,
Why do I feel like if a marketing consultant promised to make the news of Papa Ricketts’ racist ramblings go away for $50 million, that money would be spent in a cold, soulless heartbeat?
andcountingQuote Reply
andcounting,
Because that money would be spent in a cold, soulless heartbeat.
PerkinsQuote Reply
Pat Hughes is back. Things are getting real.
andcountingQuote Reply
#JavySlide
Rizzo the RatQuote Reply
Rizzo the RatQuote Reply
Javy is the baseball version of a Harlem Globetrotter.
andcountingQuote Reply
When a batter gets hits by a pitch in a spring training game, they should really just call no pitch and let them both try again.
SKQuote Reply
SK,
That’s not a bad idea, but I’d just call it a ball instead.
dmick89Quote Reply
I’d give the batter the option of taking first, but I imagine most would want to keep hitting.
Rizzo the RatQuote Reply
Rizzo the Rat,
That was my thought as well – most would want to keep hitting (so few at bats per game in ST, and it doesn’t count anyway so…)
I wonder how long we can keep this discussion going. Another 18 hours is probably all I can hope for.
SKQuote Reply
Batter’s choice makes sense on the off chance the player who was hit is still in need of some at-bats.
dmick89Quote Reply
Now that I think about it, baserunning opportunities might be more precious than at-bats. I guess it would depend on the individual player and which area he (or his manager) feels he needs more work on. Of course, HBPs are uncommon enough to make this whole conversation nearly pointless.
Rizzo the RatQuote Reply
Yes but do they really even take their baserunning opportunities seriously? Half the time they get lifted for a pinch runner, the other half they make stupid mistakes, and the other half they don’t even try.
I get giving the batter the option here, but what about the pitcher and what he needs to work on? Maybe working out of the stretch and practicing pickoffs is a priority for some, but not others.
SKQuote Reply
We might be discussing the next big inefficiency. How many teams truly do anything remotely innovative in baserunning? Ever? You could field an entire team of elite baserunners who could score 80% of the time they reached base if you planned your whole baseball organization around it.
andcountingQuote Reply
Trout -> 12 year extension, $430 million
Great deal for the Angels. Great deal for Trout. Great deal for baseball. Good for them.
MylesQuote Reply
Trout, according to FanGraphs, has already provided the Angels with $494,500,000 of value. If Trout averages 7 WAR in the first 6 years and 3 WAR in the last 6 years, that’s 60 WAR, or with a slight discounting factor $7 million a WAR over the life of the contract. Consider that Trout is a near-lock to crush those numbers and it’s a clear win.
MylesQuote Reply
Myles,
What does this have to do with ST HBP
SKQuote Reply
SK,
yeah it really should have been a fanshot
EnricoPallazzoQuote Reply
I’m warning you.
MylesQuote Reply
Rizzo the RatQuote Reply
So the Brewers are talking with Kimbrel apparently. The Cubs suck.
dmick89Quote Reply
dmick89,
If there’s anything the Brewers need, it’s a dominant reliever.
PerkinsQuote Reply
Pitch framing mumbo jumbo.
andcountingQuote Reply
andcounting,
I was hoping we’d get more data that Willson Contreras sucks at that. Thanks.
MylesQuote Reply
Myles,
If an organization/industry can’t figure out a way to pay its top performer a shit-ton of money for a long-ass time, there is no hope.
I’m glad there’s hope. I also think it helps to create a real and somewhat fair ceiling on salary that could have a much more demonstrable effect on the free agent climate and even the prospect economy than any work-stoppage threats will. Whether they say it or not, owners and GMs now have been freed from the fear that there’s no end to what players will ask for. All requests and demands will be set somewhere on the Trout scale. The fact that it got done without free agency will help Kris-Bryant types as well as fans of teams employing Kris-Bryant types.
andcountingQuote Reply
Myles,
I was surprised not to see him or the Cubs show up in the lowlights sections. (dying laughing)
andcountingQuote Reply
Brandon Morrow over/under for appearances, let’s say 25. Go.
dmick89Quote Reply
dmick89,
Under
dmick89Quote Reply
Corey Knebel has an elbow problem. Now would be a really good time for the Cubs to sign Kimbrel, before the Brewers do.
PerkinsQuote Reply
Perkins,
If the Cubs could find a team to take Chatwood they could probably do it. In order to trade Chatwood without paying all his salary you’d probably have to include Happ or Almora.
dmick89Quote Reply
dmick89,
over. i think…37.
EnricoPallazzoQuote Reply
dmick89,
I think I’d rather have Kimbrel, but I’m not very high on either Happ or Almora.
PerkinsQuote Reply
Perkins,
what a great opportunity to grab a great player and simultaneously prevent your biggest rival from getting a piece that they sorely need. really sucks that i have zero faith that the cubs get it done though.
EnricoPallazzoQuote Reply
EnricoPallazzo,
It’s exactly the type of move I’d have expected this FO to make (see also Heyward, Jason) before ownership apparently closed the purse strings.
PerkinsQuote Reply
Perkins,
Yeah, I’d make that deal if some team was interested, but I think it’s clear this team is set and they have only money to spend on political ads.
dmick89Quote Reply
dmick89,
hahaha i was just gonna respond to perkins and say that political ads don’t pay for themselves.
what a fuckin load.
EnricoPallazzoQuote Reply
EnricoPallazzo,
The Tribune may have sucked, but to my knowledge they didn’t actively support white supremacy.
dmick89Quote Reply
I’ll take the over.
berseliusQuote Reply
Agree to disagree. *counting money from stock buybacks*
BillionairesQuote Reply
goldie just signed a big extension with the cards
EnricoPallazzoQuote Reply
EnricoPallazzo,
Looks like the extension is 5/130.
berseliusQuote Reply
This is the first year I can remember that Spring Training feels like it has gone by relatively quickly. It probably helps that I’ve listened/watched to a combined 45 minutes or so of games this year.
berseliusQuote Reply
berselius,
Yeah, I think anticipation level causes time-passage observation to slow down, too. I’m looking forward to baseball, but my hopes are so low for this season and beyond that I’m not nearly as excited as I’ve been the last 4 spring trainings or so.
andcountingQuote Reply
Chris Sale ——–> extension with BOS (~5/$150MM)
I’m beginning to think Kris Bryant was serious when he said he’d like to stay with CHC for the long term. With the free agent market as broken as it is, locking up money now seems to be the smart move.
PerkinsQuote Reply
Perkins,
I’m telling you, Mike Trout set the market with his deal. I think owners and players have a better feel for what they can get and what they should pay now that they know where the ceiling is (because everyone agrees Trout is the ceiling). The free-agent game is actually really stupid for everyone involved, and now that Mike Trout is never going to play it there’s a clearer, fairer, more stable market in just signing younger players to extensions. It’s no coincidence that a rash of contract extensions have followed the Trout deal, but good free agents are still pretty much languishing in silence with less than a week before the regular season starts for real.
andcountingQuote Reply
andcounting,
What’s kind of interesting to me is that almost immediately after Harper signed, Trout signed for significantly more than Harper did. I’d expect that because he’s that much better, but it surprised me because I wasn’t expecting the contract that surpassed Harper’s to be so much higher than Harper’s.
dmick89Quote Reply
dmick89,
It surprised me too, and I bet it surprised every player in MLB not named Mike Trout. It was like an instant lesson that negotiating an extension is loads better than free agency. It sucks for someone in a bad situation who just needs to leave, but in time if free agency becomes more of an exception than a rule, it could return to being a better market for players.
andcountingQuote Reply
andcounting,
It does make me wonder if it’s more likely the Cubs extend Bryant at this point. My guess is he’s not going to want to sign an extension coming off a disappointing season.
dmick89Quote Reply
Ian Happ -> AAA
Whoa.
MylesQuote Reply
Myles,
Hooray. Dude needs to be fixed. Sucked 2nd half of last season and hasn’t turned it around in spring. Minors helped Schwarber after he was up for awhile.
BVSQuote Reply
BVS,
Keep hoping for the Zack Cozart/Tyler Chatwood trade even up. Equal contract terms.
BVSQuote Reply
The Cubs are just Happless now.
Rizzo the RatQuote Reply
Rizzo the Rat,
And unHappy.
andcountingQuote Reply
andcounting,
At Iowa you can Happ your Ks and eat them too (with Maples syrup)
BVSQuote Reply
BVS,
The roster shuffling seems kinda Happhazard right now.
andcountingQuote Reply
How concerned should we be that Jon Lester sucks?
andcountingQuote Reply
Duensing ————> DFA
berseliusQuote Reply
andcounting,
I guess it depends on how good you think this team can be. If you think they can be pretty good, maybe you should worry a little. I think they’re going to suck for the most part so I don’t really care. (dying laughing)
dmick89Quote Reply
dmick89,
I think they can be really good. I think they will kinda suck, but baseball is tricky. Lester sucking would really make success in 2019 unlikely.
andcountingQuote Reply
Dan Straily got DFA’d by the Fish today. Any interest? He’s got good spin rates. Lo(dying laughing)o(dying laughing)
BVSQuote Reply
MylesQuote Reply
Yeah, if he sucks the Cubs have no chance of being any good. I don’t think they much of a chance of being good even if he’s his normal self. I just don’t think they’re a very good team, but if everything goes right they could find themselves in the wild card race. If I had to bet on the Cubs record, I’d probably go 82-80.
dmick89Quote Reply
I’d take that bet.
BVSQuote Reply
BVS,
You think they’ll win less than that? I’m still the most optimistic Cubs fan around. (dying laughing)
dmick89Quote Reply
deGrom —–> 5/137 extension
berseliusQuote Reply
berselius,
I’m guessing the reason this took so long was that the Mets lost a lucrative Cocker Spaniel meme revenue stream when deGrom cut his hair last year.
berseliusQuote Reply
This is getting ridiculous. Wonder if the Cubs will just allow their players to comprise the entirety of every free agent class from now on.
MylesQuote Reply
i just called las vegas and bet my life savings of $1.42 on manchester united macguyver
https://deadspin.com/presenting-the-2019-name-of-the-year-bracket-1833570554
EnricoPallazzoQuote Reply
EnricoPallazzo,
honorable mention to kermit sprinkles and reymundo mundo
EnricoPallazzoQuote Reply
EnricoPallazzo,
Candy Button Disco for the Win.
Gotta appreciate the gall of naming your kid Deicide though.
BVSQuote Reply
dmick89,
(dying laughing) dmick, your “optimism” is strong that you can’t even believe you are the “most optimistic” for real.
I’ll take the over for the Twitter post containing the worst pun you can come up with that is still postable and won’t force me to apologize for my past youthful idiocy after I strike out a ton of guys during the OV All Star Game.
BVSQuote Reply
Conversation about circumcision on NPR Here and Now right now, catch it on the rebroadcast!
BVSQuote Reply
Kyle Hendricks -> extended through 2023 with an option for 2024
MylesQuote Reply
4 years, ~$56MM
Very ok. Seems like a fair deal for both sides.
MylesQuote Reply
Myles,
Really? Why?
dmick89Quote Reply
I’d have taken my chances with Hendricks and see how he does over the next year or two. It’s not a lot of money, but at the same time I’m guessing he’s going to collapse before too long and I’d even put money on him doing it before he was eligible to become a free agent.
dmick89Quote Reply
He was set to make around $10 million in 2020. This is basically a 3 year, $46 million deal, which seems fine-ish. The option is only contingent on him winning a Cy in 2020.
MylesQuote Reply
Myles,
3/46 for Hendricks probably isn’t much of a savings and the Cubs gave it out two years before they had to. This isn’t even close to as bad as Chatwood of course, and there’s a slim chance that Hendricks is actually worth it in the end (unlike Chatwood), but I’d have been happier to move on without Hendricks in a couple years then be on the books for that much money for him over the following 3 years. That’s just me though.
dmick89Quote Reply
I think it’s a reasonable contract for Hendricks, especially considering the fact that we haven’t really developed a starting pitcher worth a shit since…Kyle Hendricks, and he only barely counts. Have to find those pitchers somewhere, and he basically signed the Yusei Kikuchi deal (3/$43MM). I have every confidence (that you can for a pitcher) year-31 through year-33 Hendricks can be league average over the lifetime of the deal.
MylesQuote Reply
Option converts to a club option of $16 million with a $1.5 million buyout if he doesn’t finish in the top-3 in Cy Young voting in 2020. Even better.
MylesQuote Reply
Of course, his shoulder is going to explode next month and some of the shrapnel will tear into his elbow.
MylesQuote Reply
I think it’s a fair deal too. It’s not like anyone is nipping at the Cubs rotation’s heels from the org.
berseliusQuote Reply
Waiting on a Rizzo extension announcement next.
berseliusQuote Reply
You have the perfect analog for an extension in St. Louis, also.
MylesQuote Reply
Rizzo is 3/$45 for the next 3 years. He’ll be 32 and ready to start declining after that deal expires. If you go 4/3.5/3/2.5 for 4 years and just average 8 million a year, you could add 4 years at $104MM. Rip up the contract now, replace it with 7/$150, and it seems reasonable for both sides and you could front-load or back-load if you have to.
MylesQuote Reply
Myles,
No thanks.
dmick89Quote Reply
For context, Goldy went 5/$130, or $26 million a year for 5 years. I’m proposing 4/$105, or $26.25 million a year for 4 years.
MylesQuote Reply
Myles,
It’s not that the value isn’t good. It’s just that I’d rather wait and see where the Cubs are. This team is broke and I don’t see the need to keep spending money on future players when you already have them under control beyond this season. The only player I’d consider giving an extension to is Kris Bryant, which probably means he’s last on their list because this front office does the exact opposite of what I’d do these days.
dmick89Quote Reply
I’d rather have Rizzo for the next few years at a good price and then say goodbye than have to worry about another $100 million contract on the books.
dmick89Quote Reply
Let’s go live to Kyle Hendricks reacting to his extension
berseliusQuote Reply
I forgot he was already signed, and for 3 more years at that. Happy for the Cubs to wait on that one.
berseliusQuote Reply
Nope.
GWQuote Reply
New shit
http://www.obstructedview.net/podcast/episode-23-is-this-thing-on/
berseliusQuote Reply