Daily Facepalm 3.16.12 – Too Much Chalk Edition

In Facepalm, News And Rumors by berselius37 Comments

Obstructed View Daily Facepalm

Was there a Cubs game yesterday?

I was so in shock at Wisconsin's ability to score more than 60 points that I failed to pay attention to yesterday's games. It looks like it was probably a good thing. In the Dbacks game, Ryan Dempster gave up eight hits and a walk in three and 2/3 innings, but shocklingly only three runs. Every 2012-relevant pitcher who played in that game gave up at least a run, except for Carlos Marmol who had a scoreless (two-baserunner) inning. Kerry Wood only managed to get one out while giving up four runs. The Cubs offense managed to scratch out eleven htis but only two runs, one on a Michael Brenly homer.

The Cubs lost the other split squad game 7-5 to the Rockies. No pitcher was particularly shelled but the team slowly bled runs the whole game. Junior Lake provided the main highlight for the Cubs with a three-run homer.

A few players suffered minor injuries yesterday. Darwin Barney felt tightness on his left side while warming up in BP, and Ian Stewart was scratched with a minor quad injury. Blake DeWitt was hit on hte hand by a pitch but probably just needs to rub some dirt on it.

Is there a Cubs game today?

They face the Giants at 3PM CT. Matt Garza pitches for the Cubs, and Len and Mick have the call on Gameday audio. Or you could just watch Florida State obliterate St. Bonaventure.

Today's lineup

RF DeJesus

CF Byrd

SS Castro

1B Rizzo

3B Mather

C Clevenger

LF Sappelt

2B Cardenas

P Garza

Theo compensation on the one-yard line

Cubs relief prospect Aaron Kurcz is the PBTNL on the Cubs side. The last part of this tedious process will be the Red Sox sending some likely insignificant player back at some point in the next day or to.

OVBlog bracket challenge update

It was a big day for the favorites yesterday, with only favorite-to-upset VCU winning and stealth favorite to go deep in the tournament UNLV losiing. Mish, cwolf, and skipVB lead the group with 14 correct picks.

Lineup ordering speculation

ESPN's Doug Padilla takes a look at the possible opening day lineup. We know that David DeJesus is the leadoff hitter, and that Starlin Castro will probably be hitting third. LaHair's been talked about for the cleanup spot, Soriano's strong spring could push him back to fifth. But the most important slot that we haven't really received any tea leaves from which to read is the second spot in the lineup. Darwin Barney spent most of the time there last year but I haven't sensed a willingness from Sveum and Thoyer to give a .296 wOBA hitter the second-most PAs on the team. I like Padilla's suggestion, that everyone would just move up a spot, resulting in an opening day lineup of DeJesus, Castro, LaHair, Soriano, Byrd, Stewart, Soto, Barney, P. He has LaHair/Soriano flipped, but eh.

Cubs not leaving Peoria for South Bend

The owner of the South Bend minor league team announced on twitter yesterday that they renewed their affiliation with Arizona for another three years.The Peoria Chiefs are stil lstrapped for ash so the Cubs could move somewhere else in the nearish future, but it won't be to South Bend.

Yesterday's roster cuts

Cabrera, Beliveau, Gaub, Vitters ———> AAA
Lake, Szczur ——-> AA
Jaramillo ——–>minors

That's an a gressive promotion for Szczur, who struggled when promoted to high-A last year. He is having a pretty good spring though, for what it's worth, and his roster status has to be factoring in to his promotion.

Is there Wrigley Talk Friday today?

Well, it is Friday. Tune in at 1 PM, if you dare.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. ACT

    There goes my hope that the new Cubs would be better at lineup construction. It’s really frustrating how under-appreciated the no. 2 slot is. And it’s doubly frustrating since Castro is a (good) example of a prototypical no. 2 hitter.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. mb21

    @ ACT:
    Agreed. In whatever lineup they put together I’m likely to think that Castro is the one is most obviously out of place. That is unless they bat Garza 3rd.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. ACT

    I probably shouldn’t have been so quick to write off Sveum’s lineup-setting skills since I have little to go on except ST. Padilla’s proposed lineup seems reasonable, though I would prefer to platoon several spots/positions (I know Sveum said he won’t do this, but why not?). I do have a lingering fear of Barney being in the no. 2, slot, however.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Rice Cube

    @ mb21:
    I think he’s committed to DeJesus at the top of the order but not Barney. A couple months ago he sort of suggested Barney in the #2 spot but didn’t really say it with a lot of conviction (at least I didn’t think so). I think depending on how Soriano and LaHair do they’re more apt to just move everyone up a spot rather than hit Barney second as Doug Padilla suggested.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Author
    Berselius

    @ ACT:

    I think we’ll see some platoons, or at least some unofficial ones. Certainly Baker and Reed Johnson will see time against LHP. I think that lineup above is assumed to be the regular lineup against RHP, not against everyone.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. mb21

    I’d be surprised if we don’t see platoons. Maybe not early on, but at some point there will be. When Darwin Barney is wOBAing .270 vs righties something will change.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. WaLi

    @ GW:

    Tango really would appreciate if Tango were not addressed as “MGL and Tango”. Tango can’t stand being lumped together with anyone, and it’s happened ALOT that people just ignore bylines and such and attribute things to be that were not said by Tango.

    If you have an issue with MGL, then address it to MGL. And if you have an issue with Tango, then address it to Tango. Do NOT put the two together.

    (dying laughing)
    I wonder if Tango and MGL is acceptable?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. mb21

    @ WaLi:
    That comment from him annoyed me. Jensen was so obviously addressing the both of them in a way that did not lump their opinions together. I have no idea what the issue is. If 424 and I are arguing similar points it stands to reason that he and I do not agree on everything. However, if we’re talking about the points where we agree and someone says 424 and mb, blah blah fucking blah, so what?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. WaLi

    @ mb21:
    Yes. I am creeped out just be reading it.

    Please precede your post by stating you are a woman. I’ll delete any post otherwise, at will. This is safe-haven for ladies.

    Anyway, I’d like to know what’s on your mind, why you are here, what you think about all the comments you see, be it sports or non-sports. What you’d like to see, what you want more of, and less of.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. srO0hH1

    723134 233439Some genuinely good and utilitarian information on this internet web site , likewise I feel the layout has wonderful capabilities. 876558

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment