Better Know a Cub: Nate Schierholtz

In Better Know a Cub by myles37 Comments

When Nate Schierholtz signed with the Cubs, he was coming off of two pretty identical seasons:

        G PA AB         HR           AVG OBP SLG OPS OPS+            
2011 27 SFG NL 115 362 335 42 93 22 1 9 41 7 4 21 61 .278 .326 .430 .756 114 144 5 4 0 2 3
2012 28 TOT NL 114 269 241 20 62 8 5 6 21 3 2 23 46 .257 .321 .407 .728 104 98 1 1 1 3 2

That was good enough to garner a 1-year, 2.25 million dollar contract. In 2012, he was strictly used as the dominant half of a platoon and it showed: Nate had an .826 OPS against righties but a putrid .444 against lefthanders. It's important to note that he only received 269 PA, though. His split in 2011 was similarly severe: he hit .801 against righthanders and .562 against southpaws (again, OPS). What's interesting about that harsh split is that it's a recent development, though. His career numbers are .739/.703, so the past two years have basically made the entirety of the difference.

When the Cubs signed him, they made sure to go out and get someone to hit lefties to platoon with him (Scott Hairston). This season, the goal with Nate is clear: start him against righties whenever possible, and spin him into long-term assets at the trade deadline (The Giants traded Schierholtz + at the deadline for Hunter Pence last year). We'll see whether or not that ends up happening, but the plan itself is sound.

Offense

As noted, Schierholtz has a harsh platoon in recent years. The last time he hit a HR of a lefthander was in 2009 (when he actually had a reverse platoon split). Generally speaking, though, Schierholtz is going to provide a .260/.320/.420 line from RF. That's the equivalent, funny enough, of a Hunter Pence or Will Venable. These aren't guys we would consider all-stars at RF, or even average; I'd agree with that consensus. Schierholtz, even when platooned correctly, just isn't an offensive force. His career ISO is .141; David DeJesus' last year was .140. He doesn't draw a considerable amount of walks; his 6.2% mark is firmly well below the MLB average of 8.5%.

Schierholtz makes contact at a rate higher than the average MLB player, but he also swings more often. This would normally have the unfortunate effect of abbreviating his P/PA; however, he fouls off a much greater percentage of balls than the average player (32% to 27%). This helps drive up P/PA: his last 3 full seasons have had marks of 3.87, 3.97, and 4.00, all higher than the MLB average of 3.81. Nate has a tendency to chase pitches out of the zone, but also swings at pitches inside the zone with a pretty great frequency (the average is around 62%; his average is around 70%). All of these things point to a guy who is likely not walking a lot or striking out a lot. This means, of course, that BABIP is the supreme arbiter of the quality of his seasons. He's looked good this year, but his BABIP has been .353.

Schierholtz enjoys hitting changeups and cut fastballs and that's about it. Pitchf/x rates him as essentially average or worse against every other pitch save the knuckler.

Defense

From most accounts, Nate is a good defensive right fielder. Fans rate him as having a strong, accurate arm, and he has shown a high UZR/150 in right over his career. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like he could play CF. he was tried there for a week or so last year and rated poorly (and I remember him not having the instincts or spped for it). Even if Nate is a strong defensive RF, it doesn't provide much in the sense of surplus value, due to both the relative unimportance of defense at the position and the fact there is very little room in RF for any venturing outfielder to make plays. For what it's worth, Schierholtz has an essentially average range factor at RF; this is the primary driver of his miniscule (but not negative) defensive value.

Summary

Nate Schierholtz was brought in by Hoyer to do one thing; hit right-handed pitching. There's no reason he shouldn't be able to do that with a passable level of success. If he can do that, he can be valuable. A $2.25 million dollar contract isn't a hindrance to any team, and to be a success he'd have to provide maybe a single WAR. He's already been worth 0.4 this season, the same mark as his output last season. Schierholtz stands to get 400 or so PA on the Cubs this year and I'd expect him to have a wOBA of .330 or so. That's a valuable piece at the trade deadline; maybe not as a primary offensive upgrade, but as a very serviceable injury replacement. All told, this is a low-risk, medium-reward move that a good GM should be proud to make.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. JonKneeV

    I think you should rename this series to “Better Know a Replacement Level Player” until further notice.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. josh

    Yeah. One of those guys that would be an okay piece on a contending team, but not really a superstar. Also called Theo’s bread and butter.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. WaLi's SWMBO

    If a woman was doing this, “victims” would be telling the story in a bar instead of calling the cops. It might have actually caused an accident though because it’s hard to take a video of the car next to you while driving safely.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. dmick89

    I didn’t think much of the Shierholtz signing at the time. I didn’t like it or dislike it. Looking at how well he hits righties makes it look pretty good though. Good post.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. mikeakaleroy

    @ dmick89:

    I took it as either someone hates me and my schtick (which is about 95-99% of the world), or they just hate that the Cubs are full of replacement level players. Either way, I was on the ground in the fetal position, openly weeping for roughly 45 minutes.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. mikeakaleroy

    I know it’s really early yet, but what is Sappelt’s leash like? I guess I don’t know if he’s got options left, but if so, I wonder how long he sticks around in Chicago.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. Andrew

    So far I really like Schierholtz. He seems to never have a crappy one pitch slow grounder at bat and usually gets pretty deep into the count and sees a lot of pitches. Kind of like Dejesus in that respect. He may not produce a ton of power but he can at least make a pitcher work a bit not to mention he has a cannon which should hopefully gun some people down and thats always fun to watch.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zx63ETp5ds

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. WaLi's SWMBO

    mikeakaleroy wrote:

    what is Sappelt’s leash like?

    Might be leather. Possibly comes with a gag or choke collar. Why? Are you wanting to get him a new one? His birthday was on January 2, but maybe next year.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. WaLi

    Just got a job offer which will move me back to Illinois and found out that the Cubs aren’t going to lose today. Great day!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. dmick89

    WaLi wrote:

    Just got a job offer which will move me back to Illinois and found out that the Cubs aren’t going to lose today. Great day!

    Have you checked with SWMBO?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. 26.2cubfan

    Random question:

    I teach 120 7th graders who are being taken to a Cubs game as a field trip tomorrow. I will have half of them in class in the morning, and the other half will miss because of the game. I use these types of days as *fun* or throwaway days where we read something interesting and discuss it, but they aren’t tested on it or held accountable any other way.

    I wanted to give them something baseball related. It’d have to be a 2 page max and light enough on language and math for them to digest. Any recommendations? I was thinking of something like a basic intro to baseball stats, but that might be a little too dry. We’re also dealing with the small sample-size issue of a single game. Anyone have a favorite baseball article/fun story or something? Keep in mind, these kids are “gifted” but they’re also 13.

    (braces for a barrage of inappropriate links)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Aisle424

    @ 26.2cubfan:

    I would suggest Alvin’s post about the proper posting of posts about posting. If nothing else, it would drill into their heads that the comma exists and can easily be over-used.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. SVB

    @ Andrew:
    If the Bang Bang video montage is representative, we should have outfield corners that people won’t run on much.

    Of course, they will just run on the battery instead….

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment