Wladimir Galindo, who I mentioned last season as a possible addition to the international signing class, has reportedly signed with the Cubs. The news was broken on his twitter account in December. Yes, I’m late, but the Cubs haven’t made any announcements yet, so I’m not too broken up about it. Reactions in the blogosphere have mostly expressedpuzzlement at the timing, but it doesn’t seem all that strange to me. A few points:
- It has been suggested that the Cubs waited to sign him until he turned 16. This is not a possibility. Prospects must turn 16 before September 1st to be eligible in a given signing period. Besides that, MLB.com shows his birth date as 11/6/1996, meaning he turned 17 in November.
- It is remotely possible that MLB.com’s listed birthday is off by a year. If this is the case, then he hasn’t actually signed yet and won’t until this coming July 2nd. I doubt it. If any prospect watcher should know what his birthday is, it’s Mayo, since MLB distributes the eligibility lists. Also, Galindo hasn’t exactly been keeping a lid on this whole thing, with the announcement to the press and shots of him bass fishing in Cubs gear. You would think that if his signing wasn’t going to be made official for another five months, someone would politely tell him to shut up. In short, I think he is seventeen, and has signed.
- Why exactly does anyone think the timing is strange? The simplest explanation here is that he wanted more money than was being offered. Nobody wanted to pay him, but the Cubs told him they would keep an eye on him in the Venezuelan Winter League (which runs October through December). They liked what they saw, and after it was over made him an offer that was suitable to both sides. If that’s what happened, good for the Cubs. Since they unwittingly found themselves in max penalty territory, they might as well go after anyone who is unsigned in these winter showcases. I don’t expect his bonus to be anywhere near that of the top names, however.
In any case, he’s a big shortstop/third baseman. Jonathan Mayo likes him, and ranked him at #25 prior to the signing period. BA didn’t have him in their top 30, and TAM had him listed outside of the top 50. Mayo:
Galindo could end up at one of the corner spots in the infield or make the shift to the outfield because of his size (6-foot-3, 210 pounds) and strong arm. But he might be athletic enough to stay at shortstop.
Scouts like his big body and his raw power. Galindo also has the ability to hit for power to all fields and has a knack for putting the barrel of his bat on the ball. He is sometimes fooled by offspeed pitches and could use more game experience.
Gleyber Torres Stats and Update
About that Venezuelan Winter League. It just so happens that both Galindo and Gleyber Torres played for the Cub affiliate. The results were decent, but the sample is very small and the competition was generally a lot older.
PA | Avg | OBP | SLG | OPS+ | BB% | K% | |
Wladimir Galindo | 48 | 0.341 | 0.354 | 0.500 | 138 | 0.02 | 0.33 |
Gleyber Torres | 57 | 0.302 | 0.351 | 0.396 | 109 | 0.05 | 0.23 |
Manager Osmin Melendez was impressed by Torres:
In (the Venezuelan League) he was more present and relaxed. He played solid defense and hit well. Though his attitude was the best thing. He looks like an older player, he has a lot of maturity.
In Which I Become An Eloy Birther
The seventeen year-old takes some cuts in January.
Comments
Huh?
Aisle424Quote Reply
100K. That can’t be right.
Aisle424Quote Reply
@ Aisle424:
that’s insane.
bronson arroyo —–> dbacks
GWQuote Reply
OV: the top source for Venezuelan bass fishing info on the net.
uncle daveQuote Reply
@ Aisle424:
Doesn’t that just mean that F7’s ask and the Cubs offer are $100K apart? That sounds plausible to me…
fang2415Quote Reply
@ fang2415:
I think it’s strange that $100K would be an amount worth going to arb for. Why not just move $50K and meet in the middle, rather than risk a hearing go against you and lose a potential $2MM?
EdwinQuote Reply
Nice updates the past couple days, GW. Thanks. Jesus, Eloy is huge. Wow.
dmick89, Sweatpants GuruQuote Reply
I feel like this is a stall tactic to get F7 to sign an extension. Sign extension on our terms or:
1. You likely lose arbitration and drop to $4.4mm or whatever it was instead of the offer
Or
2. You settle at 100k less than you wanted.
Seems like a decent ploy and F7 either drops, or signs extension.
Or they just split the difference at $50k as suggested above.
Rice CubeQuote Reply
@ Aisle424:
That can’t be right. If it was the difference between $0.9 and $1.0 million for a fringe first-year eligible player, I could see it, but not for this. I’d say the difference has to be at least half a million bucks.
dmick89, Sweatpants GuruQuote Reply
I suppose one or both sides are trying to stick it to the other and they figure all they risk is a measly $100,000. I think that’s unlikely based on what we’ve heard.
dmick89, Sweatpants GuruQuote Reply
@ Rice Cube:
If both sides are committed enough to go to a hearing over $100k, I would say that bodes poorly for any hope of an extension.
GWQuote Reply
@ GW:
I agree with you, but the $100K “snag” suggests that the stall tactic is still in play. It looks weird but I feel like the Cubs don’t really have anything to lose if they’re gonna trade F7 at the deadline anyway.
Rice CubeQuote Reply
Agreed. I’m really down on that prospect.
MylesQuote Reply
@ Rice Cube:
I don’t know. A happy person performs better than a miserable one. If they intend to trade him, don’t they want to maximize the possibility of a return? If doing so only costs you a hundred grand when million dollar bills are pissed away, I have a hard time believing the Cubs wouldn’t just gone Jeff Samardzija the money. There has to be some bad blood between the two sides if they’re that close and neither will budge. I’d say both are being stupid about it.
dmick89, Sweatpants GuruQuote Reply
http://www.celebritytypes.com/big-five/test.php
GWQuote Reply
@ GW:
INTJ FTW
Berselius, Cubs #12 prospectQuote Reply
@ Berselius, Cubs #12 prospect:
that particular test is “big five” rather than myers-briggs.
i’m INTP, but i hadn’t taken a big five before. among their presidential references, i matched most closely to obama, which i found pretty funny.
GWQuote Reply
@ GW:
Had Obama for me too and this:
All of that is bullshit. Love broccoli and arugula and don’t agree much with Obama.
dmick89, Sweatpants GuruQuote Reply
@ GW:
(dying laughing), I saw the Myers-Briggs on the side and figured it was something similar when I posted the comment. I got James Madison.
Berselius, Cubs #12 prospectQuote Reply
new shit:
http://obstructedview.net/news-and-rumors/theo-epstein-on-building-under-the-current-cba.html
GWQuote Reply