Kris Bryant: Good at Baseball

In Commentary And Analysis by aisle42450 Comments

There was very little about today's Cubs game versus the Angels that was worth talking about, but there was a seedling of hope burrowed in the manure of this game.

After the "starters" were mostly pulled in the 5th inning or so, we got to see Albert Almora, Jorge Soler, Arismendy Alcantara, Javier Baez, and Kris Bryant all on the field at the same time (also: Brett Jackson and Josh Vitters). That was pretty cool.

I didn't get a chance to watch most of it, but I did get to see the highlight of the game when Albert Almora roped a double down the left field line and after a Soler strikeout looking, Kris Bryant worked a 3-2 count, fouled off a few pitches and launched a HR over the 420 foot mark in CF.

Baez also absolutely smoked a ball, but it was right at Ian Stewart (who has resurfaced with the Angels).

Darwin Barney hit a solo homerun earlier for the Cubs only other run, so there is that. The rest of the game pretty much sucked balls. Cubs lost 15-3.

 

Share this Post

Comments

  1. dmick89, Sweatpants Guru

    So who’s watching True Detective? There’s all this talk about who the killer is and it’s never even occurred to me that this was really all that important. Maybe I’m wrong about this, but I don’t think this show is a whodunit. It’s never seemed important to me anyway

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Rizzo the Rat

    @ j:
    Well, if the prospects pan out pretty well, the Cubs offense could get good eventually, and it will only be the pitching and defense that suck. Hope!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. GBTS

    @ Aisle424:
    I absolutely love the idea of Route Efficiency for outfielders. It’d be great if they could go back and analyze old plays.

    [img]https://imageshack.com/a/img823/7928/colvinohshit.gif[/img]

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. dmick89, Sweatpants Guru

    @ GBTS:
    I remember Greg Maddux bitching at Mazzone as he walked to the mound about a fly ball. You could read Maddux’s lips saying the “ball was in the air for 7 fucking seconds” and pointing at Klesko in LF.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Author
    Aisle424

    For now, the plan is for the cameras to be in three ballparks this year, and every park in the league by 2015. Like Pitch/fx, it will be made available in near-realtime for broadcast and highlights.

    The obvious question is how public the data will be, and MLBAM doesn’t have definitive answers just yet.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. dmick89, Sweatpants Guru

    @ JonKneeV:
    I must be missing something then. I couldn’t care less who committed any crimes in that show. Never have. It’s always been secondary.

    Speaking if dark and wonderful shows, Hannibal was fantastic last night. Might be my favorite show on TV at the moment.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. Just plain BVS

    I’d like to see how the defensive stats work out in the new system linked above.

    Meanwhile, Hardball Times has some info on shifts:

    http://www.hardballtimes.com/tht-live/expanded-2013-infield-shift-data/

    Sveumy employed the shift 343 times, 7th most in MLB last year. BABIP with the shift on increased by 33 points compared to the other 1000s of at bats. BABIP only increased with the shift for 8 teams: Phillies (36, but they only used it 48 times), Cubs, Twins, Rockies, Tigers, Yankees, White Sox, Blue Jays (12). Of those teams, only the Cubs and Yankees used the shift more than 200 times with the ball being put in play. It seems quite effective for some teams. The shift decreased BABIP by >40 points for the Rays, A’s, Braves, Cardinals, Padres, Angels and Red Sox.

    The link gives you how effective the shift was against certain players too. Made a big difference against David Ortiz. Carlos Peña’s BABIP against the shift was better than without. That doesn’t surprise me, since he was willing to bunt toward the holes.

    I guess the BABIP numbers reflect how good the team is at playing D when the ball is hit, but probably moreso how well the pitchers do at putting the ball where the batter will hit it to his natural pull.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. WaLi

    Castro left game after attempting to steal second with a mild hamstring strain. Baez filling in for him had a 2B, 1B, and SO.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. Pezcore

    Just plain BVS wrote:

    I’d like to see how the defensive stats work out in the new system linked above.
    Meanwhile, Hardball Times has some info on shifts:
    http://www.hardballtimes.com/tht-live/expanded-2013-infield-shift-data/
    Sveumy employed the shift 343 times, 7th most in MLB last year. BABIP with the shift on increased by 33 points compared to the other 1000s of at bats. BABIP only increased with the shift for 8 teams: Phillies (36, but they only used it 48 times), Cubs, Twins, Rockies, Tigers, Yankees, White Sox, Blue Jays (12). Of those teams, only the Cubs and Yankees used the shift more than 200 times with the ball being put in play. It seems quite effective for some teams. The shift decreased BABIP by >40 points for the Rays, A’s, Braves, Cardinals, Padres, Angels and Red Sox.
    The link gives you how effective the shift was against certain players too. Made a big difference against David Ortiz. Carlos Peña’s BABIP against the shift was better than without. That doesn’t surprise me, since he was willing to bunt toward the holes.
    I guess the BABIP numbers reflect how good the team is at playing D when the ball is hit, but probably moreso how well the pitchers do at putting the ball where the batter will hit it to his natural pull.

    What was Girardi thinking getting fancy when short is manned by Edgardo Nunez, Jayson Nix and Derek Jeter? I think you just soured me on bringing Joe home to Chicago.

    The common denominator in this statistical analysis is the Yankees and Cubs used error-prone shortstops in 2013 – – speculation is that Castro and Nunez could end up at another position during their prime.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. Just plain BVS

    @ Pezcore:
    Agreed. The teams that increased BABIP with the use of the shift aren’t known as good defensive teams in general. I thought with Castro and Barney the Cubs would be a little better than the numbers.

    But I think a lot of it has to do with the pitchers too. For the shift to work, you have to throw inside to the lefty batter, right? So he pulls the ball. I’m not convinced that 3.5/5 of our starters are good enough to be able to pitch to the shift. And of course, the Yankees’ pitching was pretty messed up last year too. The pitching angle is the only reason I can explain the Angels being among the most effective, unless their D is really a lot better than I remembered.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Edwin

    @ dmick89, Sweatpants Guru:

    Hannibal was excellent. I really enjoy the shift in Will’s character, from someone who was lost most of last season, to someone who’s found clarity. It’s also a great dynamic seeing the different supporting characters have 1-on-1 scenes with both Hannibal and Will.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Pezcore

    Just plain BVS wrote:

    @ Pezcore:
    Agreed. The teams that increased BABIP with the use of the shift aren’t known as good defensive teams in general. I thought with Castro and Barney the Cubs would be a little better than the numbers.
    But I think a lot of it has to do with the pitchers too. For the shift to work, you have to throw inside to the lefty batter, right? So he pulls the ball. I’m not convinced that 3.5/5 of our starters are good enough to be able to pitch to the shift. And of course, the Yankees’ pitching was pretty messed up last year too. The pitching angle is the only reason I can explain the Angels being among the most effective, unless their D is really a lot better than I remembered.

    2013 Yankees Second Baseman Robbie Cano is no slouch, guy has several gold gloves, so it would be a similar situation for both clubs.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Myles

    I kind of hate how little of a chance it seems Olt is being given to win 3B outright this year. I like Valbuena more than most, but Luis Luis can play 2B, where he have a definite need, and Olt should man 3B if he proves to be anything like he was before Eyegate. Even if it was straight up Valbuena/Murphy vs. Olt, give the high-upside guy a chance.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. dmick89, Sweatpants Guru

    @ Myles:
    I think you don’t give enough credit to Barney’s defense. I’m not the least bit confident that Valbuena would be more valuable overall than Barney. And for what it’s worth, I’m also not the least bit confident that a seeing Mike Olt is better than Luis Valbuena at 3rd. Even with good vision, Olt is going to strikeout a lot. He could be if he can cut down on the strikeouts, but Valbuena probably isn’t a whole lot better than Barney even if Valbuena has a relatively strong year.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. pinetar

    @ Myles:

    Olt just needs to get healthy and stay on the field. The big issue currently is with his shoulder once it calms down the rest will take care of itself.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Author
    Aisle424

    [img]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-6W8AmgIPZN0/UxS_AOELxyI/AAAAAAAAAo0/_x5BfH_8m64/w648-h365-no/Alvin-oscars.jpg[/img]

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment