The Children Are The Future- Cubs Minor League Update Sponsored by Big Red Chewing Gum & Pubic Wigs

In Minor Leagues by Obstructed View Staff49 Comments

Iowa

It was a pitching duel in Des Moines yesterday as Brett Jackson scored the only run of the game on a balk. Casey Coleman was the pitcher for Iowa working 7 IP and only giving up 2 hits. He struck out 9 batters and has a respectable ERA of 3.48. Scott Maine finished the game with two scoreless innings of his own.

Smokies 

Junior Lake went 1-4 with a BB and SB last night in his second game back from his rehab assignment. Nick Struck went 6 innings and gave up 2 ER while striking out 3. Kevin Rhoderick worked another scoreless inning and has his ERA sitting at 1.38. 

Daytona

Matt Szczur and Eric Jokisch teamed up to lead Daytona to a win. Szrzr continues his red hot streak going 3-4. He has raised his average to .256 after a slow start. On the mound Jokisch struck out 11 in 7 shutout innings. He only allowed 4 hits and walked no one. Jokisch was an 11th round pick back in 2010 and had a decent year in Peoria before finishing in AA. So far this year he is averaging a strikeout per IP and with his age it would probably be wise to get him to AA again to see if there is anything here. 

Peoria

Everyone's favorite scofflaw PJ Francescon got the win yesterday. He wasn't lights out but he got the job done going 6 IP and giving up 4 runs (only two were earned). He struck out 4 batters. Hitters are now batting .167 against him for the year. On the hitting side of things Paul Hoilman hit a HR and racked up 5 RBI's. 

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Author
    jtsunami

    Hoilman’s 2nd grand slam of the year. He’s way too old for Peoria, but the power he has is very real. Could be a pleasant surprise in the system. Maybe be a pinch hitter/spot starter type at MLB level.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Berselius

    I’d love to see the Cubs bullpen Casey Coleman. They need the help and it’s not like he has any value as a starter these days. And the Cubs have so much “depth” too.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Author
    Mucker

    Is anybody buying the Orioles this year? They have a lot of good young talent but that division is too tough. I just read an article about Bundy and that kid is ridiculous. O’s might make some noise in the next couple of years.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Author
    josh

    @ Mucker:
    Believe they’re real? No. But like you said, they could at least make a tough division a little tougher. I could see them as a dark horse for a wildcard spot. Can both wildcards come from the same division? That might help their chances. They seem like the Pirates of a couple years ago (or maybe it was last year), lots of young talent, came on strong at the beginning, then faded away.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Author
    EnricoPallazzo

    Aisle424 wrote:

    I was told there would be no math.

    “alright, here are your exams, 50 questions true or false.”
    “true.”
    “homer, i was just describing the test.”
    “true.”
    “look homer, just take the test and you’ll do fine.”
    “false.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Author
    josh

    @ Mucker:
    Given the contracts the Yankees are tied to for the next hundred years, maybe they could compete, but the Yanks can afford to cut contracts and send their A-Rods packing when they start failing to produce.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. Author
    EnricoPallazzo

    Mucker wrote:

    Is anybody buying the Orioles this year? They have a lot of good young talent but that division is too tough. I just read an article about Bundy and that kid is ridiculous. O’s might make some noise in the next couple of years.

    as a baltimore resident, i would like nothing more than to see the o’s put together a .500 season, but i can’t see them keeping this up. weiters has been pretty insane this year and presumably he’s gonna cool off at some point. i’d be pretty surprised if guys like nolan reimold and robert andino finished the season with a OPS+ > 125, though they’re both young so who knows. hammel and chen both have not looked all that good, yet both have a sky-high ERA+. actually, i think their pitching in general has been getting extremely lucky. pythW-L says they have 2 wins more than they should and i’d agree. – they’ve been able to put up big numbers when they need to.

    if they finish at .500, i’ll be surprised. hate to say it but i bet they have a 2-16 stretch that takes the wind out of their sails and then they just kind of limp through the rest of the season.

    not to mention, other teams in the division will spend $ at the ASB if needed. i really doubt angelos spends a penny, and if he does, it’ll be his usual pickup, which is some has-been who can still draw a few extra fans to the ballpark but who has no real value.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Author
    Mucker

    @ EnricoPallazzo:
    I tend to agree with you. I’ve lived in the Baltimore/DC area for 20 years and I’ve always had a soft spot for the Os. But you are pretty spot on with your points. I don’t see them sustaining this level of play but they are definitely looking better than years past and I look forward to seeing Bundy, Machado and Schoop come up.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. Author
    EnricoPallazzo

    @ Berselius:

    exactly. as long as tejada brings in a few bucks more than he’s getting paid, it’s a good investment in angelos’s book, even if he costs them a few wins.

    @ Mucker:
    yeah either way, i’m enjoying the team right now more than i ever have in the past. it’s nice to at least be able to imagine that they can be decent, especially with a few prospects making their way to mlb. although this all will be accompanied by crippling disappointment, if a lifetime of rooting for the cubs is any indicator.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. Author
    Mucker

    Look at the boy scout’s face directly behind the girl who took it in the face. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Author
    mb21

    yeah, LaHair can’t keep this up obviously, but I’m more than confident he’s better than I had thought and I was thinking he was a league average ballplayer. I also don’t think there’s much of a chance that Anthony Rizzo is a better player than LaHair is right now. So this either means LaHair stays at 1st base for the time being (he’s cheap like Rizzo) or they move him to LF and get rid of Soriano.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Author
    ACT

    What I find funny is that the guy is hitting .388/.479/.800 and they think they need to point out his BABIP to prove he’s due for a regression. It’s as if people think BABIP is the only stat that is subject to that phenomenon.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Author
    Mish

    ACT wrote:

    What I find funny is that the guy is hitting .388/.479/.800 and they think they need to point out his BABIP to prove he’s due for a regression. It’s as if people think BABIP is the only stat that is subject to that statistical phenomenon.

    Hahah yes this.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. PFD

    @ACT well yeah, but it seems like a .535 BABIP is higher than I thought it would be.. expected like 400 or something.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. Doug etetectdsaaga

    In LaHair’s defense, he is hitting 28% line drives. So there’s that. But obviously he’s due for regression. But when that regression is a .275/.341/.507 good for a .361wOBA player. I’ll take it.

    For the record, those are his ZIPS(R)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Author
    josh

    Headline on MLB:
    Makeup has helped Nathan thrive as closer

    I didn’t read the article, but I assume it’s about how he’s using rogue to give the ball more sink.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. Author
    ACT

    @ PFD:
    On the plus side, his high strikeout rate also seems due for a regression, though he’ll still strike out a lot.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Author
    josh

    I guess the point is that BABIP is LaHair’s reality check. You see his slash line and think “bullshit!” then you see his BABIP and think “yeah, bullshit.” If you looked and saw his BABIP at .375 with that slash line, you at least feel like his approach is working pretty well. Williams only struck out 26 times all season. Bryan struck out 26 times last series.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Author
    josh

    Seriously, going by career WAR, Barry Bonds is the second best player to ever play. If you deduct half his WAR for steroids and jerkiness, he’s still good enough for the HOF.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Author
    Rice Cube

    @ josh:
    Everyone who doesn’t vote for Barry Bonds for HOF deserves to get their asses kicked. It’d be a travesty to leave him out even if he’s a juiced-up asshole.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Author
    mb21

    @ Doug etetectdsaaga:
    Yeah, that’s the best thing about his great start. His projections at this point at actually pretty good. And I wouldn’t be surprised if he beats those rest of season projections at this point. He won’t beat them by much, but I could easily see .370 from him at this point. The strikeouts are going to have to come down for that to happen though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Author
    mb21

    @ josh:
    I don’t like the idea of deducting anything as the numbers are the numbers regardless of how they’re achieved, but you’re right. Barry Bonds was a HOF player before he took steroids. There’s no justification to keep him out. At least with someone like McGwire people can argue that it’s possible the steroids pushed him over the top with regards to qualification for the HOF. That’s simply nowhere even close to true for someone like Bonds. There are already cheaters and assholes in the HOF so you can’t use that argument either. Especially when you factor in that there was no rule in baseball against taking steroids when Bonds was using them.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment