Soriano, his Bat, and Momentum

In Commentary And Analysis by Obstructed View Staff111 Comments

Hitting a baseball is all about momentum. Momentum is a vector describing a "quantity of motion" or in mathematical terms p (momentum) = mass * velocity. In a closed system, momentum is conserved. Conservation of momentum means that the harder you throw the ball, the harder the ball will bounce back. Think in the case of throwing a ball against a solid wall. The harder you throw the ball, the harder it bounces back. This is easy to see in the case that fast balls tend to be hit harder and further than curve balls. What this also means is that the bat transfers momentum to the ball. This is why it can be better to use a heavier bat if you can swing it just as fast. The momentum is a product of the mass and velocity, so a heavier bat swung with the same speed as a lighter bat will have more momentum.
 
But real life is not a closed system, so in the process of hitting a baseball you will lose some momentum. Part of this momentum is lost in the deformation of the ball and to a lesser extent the bat.
 

 
A number to determine what this compression does to the ball is called the Coefficient of Restitution (COR). The COR rating for a baseball is 0.555, which means a ball will return 55.5% as fast as it came in. When I used this number with another known my numbers didn’t come out correct and I think this is due to the COR of a bat. I was able to get the numbers to work if I use a COR for ball + bat of .37.
 
The formula for the balls exit speed will be:

Where:
va is the final velocity of the first object after impact (ball)
vb is the final velocity of the second object after impact (bat)
ua is the initial velocity of the first object before impact (ball)
ub is the initial velocity of the second object before impact  (bat)
ma is the mass of the first object (ball)
mb is the mass of the second object (bat)
Cr is the coefficient of restitution
 
What we can assume is that Alfonso Soriano isn’t swinging the bat as fast due to his aging. He just can’t swing the bat as fast he can when he was younger. Let’s say 6 years ago in 2006 when he had 46 home runs his bat speed was 81 mph*.  We know the weight of his bat was 33 oz. So his momentum is 81 mph * 33 oz = 2673 mph*oz (this is a made up unit, but it will work). Let’s say that over the years his bat speed has dropped 3% to 78.55 mph while still swinging the same bat. The new bat speed momentum is 78.55 mph * 33 oz = 2592 mph*oz. This is going to relate to less momentum being transferred to the ball which means the balls aren’t going fly as far. Soriano may still hit a 95 mph fastball** out of the park if he makes contact with it, but an 85 mph curveball may not have enough momentum to make it out of the park.
 
*I am using 81 mph because I read that Albert Pujols’ bat speed was 86.99 mph with a 31.5 oz bat. This gives us a momentum of 2740 mph  * oz. I’m just going to assume Soriano is his prime was a little worse than that. For reference, it is said that Babe Ruth had a 54 oz bat and swung at an estimated 75 mph.
 
**A baseball has a weight between 5 oz and 5 ¼ oz. This gives an average weight of 5.125. At 95 mph, the ball has a momentum of 486.9 mph*oz. At 85 mph, the ball has a momentum of 435.6 mph*oz.

 
Sveum has asked Soriano to drop his bat weight down an ounce, from 33 ounces to 32 ounces. This is to increase his bat speed. In our previous example I assumed that Soriano had a bat speed of 81 mph. If he returns to this bat speed with the loss of an ounce, his new momentum will be 81 mph * 32 oz =  2592 mph*oz which is where it was with a larger bat at a slower speed. What it looks like though is that the exit speed of the ball will be more, even if he uses a lighter bat, so it should pay off.
 
Another thing to consider is that the change in bat speed will effect where the ball will make contact with the bat. He may be late with the swing or quicker with swing so that will effect where the ball goes.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    The longer LaHair continues this streak, the more afraid I become of a drastic and precipitous regression. That 30% K-rate, outlandish BABiP and Pujols-esque ISO haunt me.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Author
    Rice Cube

    Whoops. If you saw the pitch location on Gameday…

    I’m surprised that wasn’t a grand slam, that ball had “KILL ME” written all over it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    I guess Dempster decided he didn’t want to wait for the bullpen to fuck it up.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    LaHair is going to win the Triple Crown this year and lead the league in SB%. Superstar.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    Was that pitch as meaty as it looked on Gameday? Because to me, it looks like Soriano just turned a hanging slider into a fucking WAG.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Author
    ACT

    @ Rice Cube:
    It was a bad call by the Cards (though I’m less concerned about the bad inning than I am about the fact that Demp has been through the order 3 times already).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    goddamit, if a bunch of idiots on computers in living rooms drinking beers know that a sac bunt is a moronic move, why is it so hard for an MLB manager

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    if brett boone and rick sutcliffe know that Lahair is gonna get walked if Castro bunts, why the fuck don’t dale swayme? Time for him to get a chat from Theo the same way he gave to Campana earlier in the game

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    That Castro sac bunt was the dumbest thing I’ve seen since Neifi’s two outs in the bottom of the ninth bunt.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. Author
    josh

    Hey guys, i was curious what your opinion was on having one of the best hitters on the team bunt with runners on first and second and the fastest guy on the team on first. I was curious if you guys thought that was a good idea and a bad idea.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    Dale Sveum is a unmitigated disaster. I want him gone. Like, yesterday.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    That inning was just managing FAIL after managing FAIL and it all worked out.

    If by “working out” one means “getting two runs when you could have gotten at least double that amount.”

    Even when this team succeeds it fails, because they are managed by a fucking myopic moron.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    Sveum’s postgame PC will be like watching a puppy who’s caught its tail and thinks it’s an achievement.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. Author
    josh

    @ ACT:
    The umpire seemed to be calling any borderline pitch tonight. Which is fine. Works well for guys like Dolis who hang out right at the bottom of the zone.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    @ josh:
    He was probably anxious to get back to the umpires room so they could all have a good laugh about the festival of bad they just saw.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Author
    josh

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:
    Yeah, the stubborn refusal to let his hitters hit is frustrating. We might have walked out of Milwaukee with at least one win if he just lets anyone not named Tony Campana swing away. At least this was a win. I mean, we’re not going to win the World Series, but I still like to see them beat the damn cards.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. Author
    Rice Cube

    I do like the defensive shifts Sveum has been employing and there does seem to be some improved defense but the AGGRESSIVE BASERUNNING and the buntfest need to be cut down. I guess the front office is still secretly hoping for a top 5 pick which is why they haven’t had the Billy Beane talk with Sveum yet.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    @ josh:
    I like a win any time. But the sheer amount of mental mistakes in the 8th and 9th innings, taken in concert with his auto-bunt and AGGRESSIVE BASERUNNING strategies, makes me think that once you get ol’ Dale away from his precious spray charts, he’s just a stick-in-the-mud baseball guy like most managers.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    @ Rice Cube:
    The shifts are nice, but any moron who can read a spray chart can set that up. He was fucking up basic shit for two straight innings. That was like watching Mike Martz try to manage the clock.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Author
    ACT

    This is why I sorta hate the draft going in reverse order of winning percentage: it creates a perverse incentive for losing (or at least not putting much effort into winning). I like it when they win (even when they suck), but I also want the rebuilding project to work. I hate being deeply torn like this (as I’m sure the FO is also torn).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Author
    josh

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:
    No, I agree. I’m glad the Cards found it in their heart to make some shitty plays and the Cubs thereby found some way to win. I’m not happy with what I’ve seen from Sveum at all. I didn’t really get it at the time of the signing, and I don’t get it now.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Author
    mb21

    WaLi, I know I said this in an email, but should also be said here. This is a fantastic article and thanks a lot for writing it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    @ ACT:
    Agreed. I hate having to wash the taste of shitty baseball and stupid managing out of my mouth with elixir of draft position.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. Doug etetectdsaaga

    Why do you guys hate the baserunning. We’ve actually been a very good team running the bases. Sure, we’ve made more outs doing it too, but overall it’s been positive and we’ve been mostly good doing it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    @ Doug etetectdsaaga:

    They lead the league in CS and they’re 14th (out of 16 NL teams) in total bases, and they have contributed 2 base runs. The only person who thinks this team is anything but mediocre, at best, on the bases is Dale Sveum.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. Author
    Rice Cube

    One interesting stat that I enjoyed tonight…

    In six plate appearances, David DeJesus saw 39 pitches. He did strike out three times, but they had to work for them, dammit.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    Jed and Theo need to give Swayme a limit or quota of bunts per game that he can’t go over. I’ll suggest 0, but I’m guessing 1-2 is more realistic.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    There are very few players who I think are too shitty of people to be allowed to play their respective sport. Ron Artest (I refuse to call him meta world peace) is one of them.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    @ josh:
    He was always a good hitter with the Royals, but he’s gotten into some bad habits the last 2-3 seasons. Couple that with age-based decline, and you see games like tonight less and less often. It was good to see him look like his old self at the plate, though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    OMFG, even Sullivan called this fucking stooge out, and fucking Sveum sutkc by his choice. Fucking dumbass cracker:

    The Cubs stranded 14 baserunners, went 3-for-17 with runners in scoring position and still haven’t figured out how to execute a bunt, a recurring theme. Dale Sveum made a risky move in the eighth by having Starlin Castro sacrifice with two on and no outs.

    Sveum said he wanted to stay out of the double play, “even though you figure they’re going to walk (Bryan) LaHair” to get to Soriano.

    “The more people you start getting on base and turning that (lineup) over is fine with me,” Sveum said.

    Soriano was 0-for-9 with seven strikeouts against the reliever, while LaHair already was 3-for-4 in the game with a two-run homer.

    “Some poor bunting, but it wasn’t as much the bunting as you have to pull back and slash in those situations when they’re charging,” he said. “It’s hard to get guys to understand that. It’s something you work on and work on, but it kind of speeds up a little during the game. That’s something we have to work on as much as anything because it’s such a prevalent part of the game.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. Author
    Suburban kid

    The Cubs’ flagship radio station is WGN/720 AM. Be the holy feck, this is a quare wan. With the oul’ recent end of the feckin’ Pittsburgh Pirates’ run on KDKA, this may now be the longest team-to-station relationship in MLB. Jesus, Mary and holy Saint Joseph. Pat Hughes did the play-by-play along with color commentator Ron Santo (until the feckin’ latter’s death in December 2010) and pre- and post-game host Judd Sirott; Keith Moreland, a holy member of the 1984 Cubs, became Hughes’s color man with the start of sprin’ trainin’ in February 2011. Bejaysus this is a quare tale altogether. , to be sure.

    http://mickopedia.org/mickify.py?topic=chicago+cubs

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. Author
    WaLi

    Hey guys, thanks for all the kind words for the article. I hope it made sense as I put it together pretty quick. I also had this table I forgot to attach that shows the ball exit speed based on the COR equation above.

    Weight (oz) Speed (mph) Momentum Exit Speed 95 mph Ball Exit Speed 85 mph
    2006 Pujols 31.50 86.99 2740.19 119.44 117.65
    2006 Soriano 33.00 81.00 2673.00 113.71 111.85
    2012 Soriano 33.00 78.55 2592.00 110.80 108.94
    2012 Soriano 32.00 81.00 2592.00 112.83 111.03
    Baseball 5.13 -95.00 -486.88
    Baseball 5.13 -85.00 -435.63

    Also I forgot to mention that this is simplified quite a bit. It doesn’t take into account the spin of the ball or where on the bat the ball makes contact or when in the swing the ball makes contact to determine whether the ball is hit to left field or right field. This is just one dimensional momentum.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  33. Author
    WaLi

    Rice Cube wrote:

    Hey WaLi, are you able to write a similar piece re: the corked bat and its effect on a batted ball?

    The advantages of having a corked bat would depend on how much faster you can swing it. Let’s say you have a 31.5 oz bat and you cork it. By corking it you can reduce the weight 1.5 oz. So if you can swing it fast enough to make up for that 1.5 oz in loss of mass then you come out to an advantage. Also if you can swing it faster, you can wait on the ball more so there is an advantage there. This was a problem I had with the calculations above though. I wasn’t sure how much faster Soriano’s bat would get by reducing the weight an ounce.

    Weight //Speed //Momentum //Exit Speed 95 mph Pitch//Exit Speed 85 mph pitch
    Corked 31.50 80.00 2520.00 111.20 109.42
    Uncorked 30.00 84.00 2520.00 114.45 112.75

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  34. Author
    Rice Cube

    @ WaLi:
    I got the part where the bat would be lighter but since the bat is now sort of hollow instead of one solid chunk of wood I thought that would change the way the ball would bounce off the bat due to the difference in material or energy transfer or whatever. That was probably what the MythBusters guys were trying to do (not very well).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  35. Author
    WaLi

    @ Rice Cube:
    If you fill it with the proper cork, the COR is surprisingling similar to a solid bat.

    This means it should perform the same as far as energy transfer.

    However, I read that with Sosa’s bat he didn’t cork his bat the traditional way (drilling out the center from one end and filling with cork). He had his bat corked in the taper closer to the handle. This allowed the moment of inertia to be greater at the end of the bat where you would want it (think swinging a sledge hammer compared to a bat) so he had some advantage since it wasn’t a uniform loss of weight. This disadvantage with this is that the bat is weaker around the tapered area, so when he got jammed with a pitch inside (as he did) the bat was more likely to break. This actually lends credence to his explanation of having a Batting Practice bat, as during BP the pitcher isn’t going to jam you.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  36. Author
    mb21

    WaLi wrote:

    This actually lends credence to his explanation of having a Batting Practice bat, as during BP the pitcher isn’t going to jam you.

    Interesting. I’ve never cared one way or the other, but it would seem silly to use a bat corked in the area his bat was corked in seeing as it’s much more likely to shatter.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  37. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    I think we’d be shocked if we knew how prevalent bat alterations were. Hell, Bob Brenly said once that the Giants kept a cabinetmaker on staff when he played there.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  38. Author
    Rice Cube

    @ WaLi:
    So I guess in Sosa’s case he’d want all his force focused in the sweet spot (end of the bat or thereabouts) and that would more efficiently transfer the force to the baseball to make it go further. Interesting.

    I’d do a Star Wars segue since we’re talking about the force here, but this physics stuff is very cool.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment