Chicago Cubs @ Houston Astros

In Game Threads by Obstructed View Staff225 Comments

Time: 7:05 pm CT
Gameday

Cubs wOBA wRC RS Astros wOBA wRC RS
Starlin Castro .332 .557 -0.13 Michael Bourn .307 .451 0.03
Darwin Barney .293 .386 0.03 Angel Sanchez .287 .363 -0.07
Marlon Byrd .338 .561 -0.01 Hunter Pence .342 .574 -0.01
Aramis Ramirez .350 .591 -0.03 Carlos Lee .338 .546 -0.05
Carlos Pena .378 .680 -0.01 Brett Wallace .326 .484 0.03
Alfonso Soriano .339 .518 -0.10 Chris Johnson .319 .445 -0.05
Tyler Colvin .318 .430 0.00 Joe Inglett .301 .372 -0.06
Geovany Soto .362 .577 -0.01 Humberto Quintero .272 .262 -0.01
Ryan Dempster .175 .000 0.00 Nelson Figueroa .175 .000 0.00
4.3 -.25 3.5 -0.19

 

Starting Pitcher IP/GS FIP
Ryan Dempster 6.23 3.95
Nelson Figueroa 7.33 4.31
Bullpens xFIP
Cubs 3.7
Astros 5.4

Score: Cubs 5, Astros 3.6
Win Probability: 60.7%

Starting Pitcher IP/GS FIP
Ryan Dempster 6.23 3.95
Nelson Figueroa 7.33 4.31


Share this Post

Comments

  1. Suburban kid

    [quote name=GBTS]This team sucks.[/quote]Spoken presumably with a disgusted, descending emphasis, i.e., THIS Team sucks.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Aisle424

    Didn’t Figueroa dominate the Cubs last year? I feel like he did. Because that 60% seems really high to me too.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Aisle424

    He shut them out for 6 innings in the last game of the year last year, plus he went 5 innings and gave up 3 runs in a start before that, but the one I was thinking of was when he was still with the Mets as he struck out 10 in 7 innings, allowing 1 run at the end of August.

    It’s not as bad as I thought, but I stand by that 60% win probability seems awfully high.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. fang2415

    Wow, the Astros *really* suck. 2 hitters above league average? And only by like twenty points? The Cubs are pretty mediocre, but the Astros just plain suck. I predict they win 5-3.

    Nice to see that our national nightmare of Soto batting in a sensible place in the lineup is finally over.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Mish

    Angry that I tuned in to the Rays and the Sox were batting down 1-0. The Rays scored their one run for the day and I missed it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Rice Cube

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]Why is our best leadoff hitter in aa? Another double for bjax[/quote]
    Because the Byrd is the word, man.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mish]Don’t you like anything?[/quote]
    I’d like Soto not to bat 8th but you see how well that’s working out.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. dylanj

    the astros are a fucking joke. Their MLB team sucks, their farm sucks and McLane is selling the club. So if the Cubs struggle tonight even just a little bit i will be full of rage

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. GW

    [quote name=fang2415]So… the run totals here are completely different from base runs, right? Can anybody explain to me why anyone would use base runs when you can just use wRC and RS? Without me having to read http://www.tangotiger.net/wiki/index.php?title=Base_Runs, I mean, (dying laughing).[/quote]
    base runs is the best run estimator, but is non-linear and fairly complex. wRC assumes league average in all situations, which is useful in evaluating an individual relative to the rest of the league, but not as much for actually predicting runs.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. melissa

    I literally just facepalmed myself when I saw that Barney is hitting 2nd and Soto’s hitting 8th. It’s a way of [L]ife.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. melissa

    [quote name=Rice Cube]^ Methinks that should be a broken heart, but very nicely done.[/quote]
    Like a BFF necklace that you guys can share with your best stat fag buddy. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Rice Cube

    [quote name=melissa]Like a BFF necklace that you guys can share with your best stat fag buddy. (dying laughing)[/quote]
    It just might work.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. mb21

    [quote name=fang2415]So… the run totals here are completely different from base runs, right? Can anybody explain to me why anyone would use base runs when you can just use wRC and RS? Without me having to read http://www.tangotiger.net/wiki/index.php?title=Base_Runs, I mean, (dying laughing).

    Annd… does the score prediction actually come from any of that? Or do you guys just make it up?[/quote]Base Runs would be the best way to go, but is far too complex for something like this. Plus, I’m not even sure half the projections have the necessary stats to even calculate it. I know some do, but I know some don’t.

    wRC basically replaces Bill James Runs Created. It ignores sequencing, which is huge. Base Runs takes it into consideration. FIP also ignores sequencing.

    Basically, these totals are accurate if you don’t consider sequencing.

    The run totals are based on the offense, defense, starting pitcher and bullpen. The Win Probability is calculated using Pythagenpat. It’s adjusted for home field advantage.

    The numbers aren’t accurate. There’s too much that I can’t include, but they give us a general idea of the strength of each team compared to the other.

    It’s just really easy to set this up and once it’s done it’s just as easy to publish here. It shows the projections and how many weighted runs the team would score absent sequencing, how many runs the pitching staff would allow absent sequencing (and absent HR/FB luck with the bullpen). That’s a lot that it doesn’t show.

    I think I said last year and maybe when I first posted these here that if you take these numbers and bet all your money you deserve to lose all of it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. mb21

    [quote name=dylanj]so does this site have a gay sex chat room or what?[/quote]No. As many people that would be in there, this site would crash in about 20 minutes.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. Mish

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]I forget did keith law leave brett jackson out of hos top 100? If so I dont get it[/quote]
    KLaw had him as his “101”, or so I remember.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. bubblesdachimp

    [quote name=Mish]KLaw had him as his “101”, or so I remember.[/quote]
    This is what I remembered as well. I just dont see how he isnt a potential all star if he stays in center. He seems to geg on base well hit for power and can run

    Bubbles is confused

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. melissa

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Should have been a three-run triple. Lazy Latins clogging the bases.[/quote]
    I was thinking in the park grand slam.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Mish

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]Vitters goes deep.. I still have faith in the bat[/quote]Hows he looked? I saw he had a big opening day.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. cdw

    [quote name=mb21]I know Barney doesn’t have many plate appearances, but a .333 average and a .316 OBP is funny.[/quote]
    How is this possible? Does Barney have a sac fly in that is in the denominator of OBP and therefore
    Pulling OBP below his BA?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Mish

    [quote name=cdw]How is this possible? Does Barney have a sac fly in that is in the denominator of OBP and therefore
    Pulling OBP below his BA?[/quote]Sac hits count as a PA but not an AB.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Rice Cube

    [quote name=cdw]How is this possible? Does Barney have a sac fly in that is in the denominator of OBP and therefore
    Pulling OBP below his BA?[/quote]
    It should even out now. He took a walk earlier, but he did have a sac fly a few games ago. Sac flies count against OBP.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Xoomwaffle

    [quote name=Mish]Fuld’s a single away from the cycle now.[/quote]
    Well, Barney is now a double and a homerun shy of the cycle.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. Xoomwaffle

    And now the guys on ESPN are up on their high horse about steroids… God this is getting old. “To me the record is still 61.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. mb21

    [quote name=Xoomwaffle]And now the guys on ESPN are up on their high horse about steroids… God this is getting old. “To me the record is still 61.”[/quote]I hate that. The record is 73. It’s a matter of record. There is no denying that the single season home run record is 73. It’s as much a fact as the following statement: today is Monday.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. ZappBrannigan

    [quote name=mb21]I hate that. The record is 73. It’s a matter of record. There is no denying that the single season home run record is 73. It’s as much a fact as the following statement: today is Monday.[/quote]
    and Tuesday comes after

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. mb21

    Marlon Byrd off to another hot start this season. Darwin Barney is going to become the first to hit .400 since Ted Williams. Dempster is rolling tonight.

    Quade is a genius again.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. Xoomwaffle

    [quote name=mb21]I hate that. The record is 73. It’s a matter of record. There is no denying that the single season home run record is 73. It’s as much a fact as the following statement: today is Monday.[/quote]
    I just hate the insinuation that guys who haven’t been caught aren’t pushing the boundaries in other ways or haven’t found something undetectable.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. bubblesdachimp

    Keving goldstein just said he never said castro was slow on twitter to me.. Anyone got the quote?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]I hate that. The record is 73. It’s a matter of record. There is no denying that the single season home run record is 73. It’s as much a fact as the following statement: today is Monday.[/quote]Today is Friday for me. Prove me wrong.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. mb21

    You can probably search ACB and find it. He never said he was slow. He just made it sound as though he had average speed.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. Berselius

    I love how I’m blacked out of this Astros games despite the fact that I pay for the sports tier and still don’t get the Astros RSN.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. Xoomwaffle

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]Keving goldstein just said he never said castro was slow on twitter to me.. Anyone got the quote?[/quote]
    He has always said he had average speed. Made fun of people who said he was fast on his podcast by stating his time to first.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  33. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]I love how I’m blacked out of this Astros games despite the fact that I pay for the sports tier and still don’t get the Astros RSN.[/quote]Same thing here except with Kansas City. The difference between you and I is that I’d actually like to watch the Royals. I was able to yesterday and then GBTS told me I was watching a replay. Bastard.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  34. mb21

    [quote name=dylanj]the record is 61

    fuck bonds[/quote]Pretty sure the record is 73. That’s something you’ll have to deal with.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  35. Berselius

    [quote name=Xoomwaffle]He has always said he had average speed. Made fun of people who said he was fast on his podcast by stating his time to first.[/quote]
    I have no idea why people listen to their podcast. I listened to it once or twice and they seem to consistently go off on tangents about postmodern literature and indie music. IIRC they loved insisting that they weren’t hipsters (dying laughing). Even if it was more entertaining there’s no way I’m listening to a podcast for TWO FUCKING HOURS.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  36. fang2415

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Fuck a duck, that’s the second hard out Soto’s hit today. That sucks.[/quote]
    Soto’s BABIP is .208 so far. And I’m a little surprised that Castro’s is only .351. Although I don’t think that includes today’s display of Castrotasticism.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  37. Berselius

    [quote name=mb21]Pretty sure the record is 73. That’s something you’ll have to deal with.[/quote]
    The record is 266 R+RBI. Use a real stat, faget.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  38. ZappBrannigan

    [quote name=Rice Cube]I’m only on GameDay. How many pitches is Castro at in this at-bat?[/quote]
    13!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  39. mb21

    That was starting to remind me of this AB some Dodger player had against Matt Clement back in 2003 or 2004. I think it was a 17-pitch AB and Clement had thrown a gem in a 1-1 game. The 17th pitch was the game winning home run. I wish I could remember who hit it because the guy never hit home runs.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  40. mb21

    [quote name=ZappBrannigan]Len and Bob are cheesing out about Castro swinging at pitches outside the strike zone[/quote]Castro does like to swing the bat. Not as much as Zambrano, but pretty close.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  41. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]Castro does like to swing the bat. Not as much as Zambrano, but pretty close.[/quote]
    He seems unusually good at making contact though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  42. bubblesdachimp

    [quote name=mb21]That was starting to remind me of this AB some Dodger player had against Matt Clement back in 2003 or 2004. I think it was a 17-pitch AB and Clement had thrown a gem in a 1-1 game. The 17th pitch was the game winning home run. I wish I could remember who hit it because the guy never hit home runs.[/quote]
    I remember watching that live I want to say it was furcal but im not sure

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  43. Aisle424

    [quote name=mb21]That was starting to remind me of this AB some Dodger player had against Matt Clement back in 2003 or 2004. I think it was a 17-pitch AB and Clement had thrown a gem in a 1-1 game. The 17th pitch was the game winning home run. I wish I could remember who hit it because the guy never hit home runs.[/quote]

    I remember that. I was sitting in my car waiting for the at-bat to end so I could go meet my friends and it just kept going and then I sat and swore in my car for a few more minutes after that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  44. AndCounting

    [quote name=mb21]That was starting to remind me of this AB some Dodger player had against Matt Clement back in 2003 or 2004. I think it was a 17-pitch AB and Clement had thrown a gem in a 1-1 game. The 17th pitch was the game winning home run. I wish I could remember who hit it because the guy never hit home runs.[/quote]Was it Jose Viscaino?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  45. AndCounting

    [quote name=ZappBrannigan]Len and Bob are cheesing out about Castro swinging at pitches outside the strike zone[/quote]The fact that he was making contact on everything was pretty impressive, especially against a guy he was seeing for the first time. But they did joke that Carlos Pena would have walked three times in the at-bat. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  46. Rice Cube

    [quote name=AndCounting]The fact that he was making contact on everything was pretty impressive, especially against a guy he was seeing for the first time. But they did joke that Carlos Pena would have walked three times in the at-bat. (dying laughing)[/quote]
    Patience, my young Padawan…

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  47. Horny Goat

    [quote name=Xoomwaffle]And now the guys on ESPN are up on their high horse about steroids… God this is getting old. “To me the record is still 61.”[/quote]
    fuck those assholes.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  48. Horny Goat

    about time this inning ended (dying laughing)

    how many times has Aramis thrown a ball in the dirt this year with that strong arm of his. grrr

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  49. fang2415

    [quote name=Xoomwaffle]And now the guys on ESPN are up on their high horse about steroids… God this is getting old. “To me the record is still 61.”[/quote]
    Anyway, they’re wrong, it’s obviously 60. Anything after the 154th game gets an asterisk.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  50. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=fang2415]Anyway, they’re wrong, it’s obviously 60. Anything after the 154th game gets an asterisk.[/quote]Nothing counts since they outlawed the spitball. The record is 12.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  51. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Nothing counts since they outlawed the spitball. The record is 12.[/quote]
    That must have been before they installed fences.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  52. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rice Cube]That must have been before they installed fences.[/quote]I’m old school. I was hating on HR records before it was cool.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  53. fang2415

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Nothing counts since they outlawed the spitball. The record is 12.[/quote]
    But then anyone could hit 12 homers with a 60.5-ft pitching distance. Even Yellon. That record is his by right.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  54. Berselius

    Time for Dempster to go. When Michael Fucking Bourn is taking you to the wall you are done (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  55. Berselius

    [quote name=fang2415]Bring in Russell. I don’t care if he starts tomorrow, we need him NOW[/quote]
    It just might work

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  56. AndCounting

    [quote name=fang2415]Bring in Russell. I don’t care if he starts tomorrow, we need him NOW[/quote]That’s a modest proposal.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  57. Horny Goat

    [quote name=fang2415]Bring in Woody. I don’t care if he starts tomorrow, we need him NOW[/quote]
    Fixed

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  58. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Nothing counts since they outlawed the spitball. The record is 12.[/quote]I only count the first year of the National League. The record is 5.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  59. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]I only count the first year of the National League. The record is 5.[/quote]The Tribune just called. You’re hired.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  60. Horny Goat

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Leave Starters in too long. Let’s see what happens.[/quote]
    touche (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  61. mb21

    [quote name=fang2415]The $1.4 million I put after I saw the Cubs 5 Astros 4 projection is looking safe[/quote]Not with John Grabow in. More like Cubs 5, Astros 29

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  62. fang2415

    To be fair, Quade is probably saving MWM for tomorrow since they’ll each need to go two innings after Russell’s 3 (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  63. fang2415

    [quote name=mb21]Not with John Grabow in. More like Cubs 5, Astros 29[/quote]
    I actually hedged 380K on that one so I’d be fine there too

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  64. Mercurial Outfielder

    John Grabow and his agent must have been (dying laughing) all the way to the bank when they left Hendry’s office after signing that deal.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  65. mb21

    Call me crazy, but 1 run lead in the 7th, that’s setup time, right? Even if you need those guys for 3 innings the next day, gotta win today.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  66. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]Call me crazy, but 1 run lead in the 7th, that’s setup time, right? Even if you need those guys for 3 innings the next day, gotta win today.[/quote]Ignore the numbers. Let’s see what happens.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  67. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=fang2415]Hey, that was easy. So why the hell isn’t Grabow starting tomorrow?[/quote]He’s only just passed his bullpen test.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  68. Rice Cube

    [quote name=fang2415]Hey, that was easy. So why the hell isn’t Grabow starting tomorrow?[/quote]

    They’d have had to double his salary for that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  69. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rice Cube]They’d have had to double his salary for that.[/quote]And they’ve already used that money to pay Koyie Hill’s contract.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  70. fang2415

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]He’s only just passed his bullpen test.[/quote]
    Give it a week. They can put him in the rotation as soon as he records a station ID for WGN

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  71. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rice Cube]That’s another loud out for Soto. Eventually they’ll drop, right?[/quote]I’ve never seen a hitter hit more line drives right at people.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  72. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]I’ve never seen a hitter hit more line drives right at people.[/quote]
    Seems like someone’s been studying the spray charts very well.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  73. GW

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]I’ve never seen a hitter hit more line drives right at people.[/quote]
    I’ve got a trivia question for you, who hit the hardest line drives?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  74. Rice Cube

    Geez…I’m reading the reliever leverage chapter of “The Book” now and I think Quade is doing it wrong. Why waste Marshall on the bottom of this order?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  75. dylanj

    our fucking offense just cant get the job done. Put up 5 early and do nothing the rest of the game. VS THE ASTROS BULLPEN.

    they deserve to lose

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  76. fang2415

    [quote name=dylanj]our fucking offense just cant get the job done. Put up 5 early and do nothing the rest of the game. VS THE ASTROS BULLPEN.

    they deserve to lose[/quote]
    Right on. You can’t expect to beat the Astros if you can’t score at least 9 runs.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  77. Horny Goat

    I’m calling a wild pitch/passed ball..tie game, followed by a flare single for the lead. Who’s with me.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  78. Xoomwaffle

    [quote name=fang2415]Right on. You The Cubs can’t expect to beat the Astros win any fucking games with this bullpen if you can’t score at least 9 runs.[/quote]
    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  79. bubblesdachimp

    10 games in not a fan of quade. We supposedly have 7 relievers but 2 are worthless in shark and grabow.. Tomorrow is going to be an unmitigated disaster. How can you go into a gam expecting 50 pitches? We are going,to burn the pen out before we get to msy.. Shit we go to colorado next.. If,you are intent on sacrificing a game bring up diamond and say fuck it you are throwing 100 wether you are good or miserable.

    Good news is I think we will get to see chris carpenter sooner than later

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  80. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Horny Goat]I’m calling a wild pitch/passed ball..tie game, followed by a flare single for the lead. Who’s with me.[/quote]
    False.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  81. mb21

    [quote name=fang2415]Are the LI numbers at http://www.insidethebook.com/li.shtml really out of date or something? It says that Bourn’s PA should have had an LI of 4.9, but http://www.fangraphs.com/livewins.aspx?date=2011-04-11&team=Astros&dh=0&season=2011 says it was 5.6. Can a couple years of data really change it that much?

    Also, thank fuck for Marmol.[/quote]I don’t understand how LI is calculated. I’ve never really looked into it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  82. Xoomwaffle

    Marmol enters the game and gameday reads as follows: Slider, slider, slider, slider, slider. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  83. Horny Goat

    [quote name=mb21]Nasty[/quote]
    he’s been damn good this year so far except for that one game, helped out by the dribbler.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  84. fang2415

    [quote name=Xoomwaffle]Right on. You The Cubs can’t expect to beat the Astros win any fucking games with this bullpen if you can’t score at least 9 runs.[/quote]Correct

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  85. Horny Goat

    [quote name=Xoomwaffle]Slider, slider, slider, slider, slider. (dying laughing)[/quote]
    Marmol is good at sliders.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  86. fang2415

    [quote name=mb21]I don’t understand how LI is calculated. I’ve never really looked into it.[/quote]LI has become one of my favorite stats. I think it’s basically the range of WPA outcomes that a PA can have, with the average set at 1.

    Or in English, how likely is this PA to affect the outcome of the game?

    Deuced difficult to find a formula for it though (why fangraphs doesn’t print all of those prominently I have no idea)… I’ll have a scroogle before Marmol gives me a heart attack

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  87. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=GW]I’ve got a trivia question for you, who hit the hardest line drives?[/quote]Chico Escuela.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  88. GW

    [quote name=fang2415]LI has become one of my favorite stats. I think it’s basically the range of WPA outcomes that a PA can have, with the average set at 1.

    Or in English, how likely is this PA to affect the outcome of the game?

    Deuced difficult to find a formula for it though (why fangraphs doesn’t print all of those prominently I have no idea)… I’ll have a scroogle before Marmol gives me a heart attack[/quote]
    Pretty sure everyone uses Tango’s formula, and that its proprietary, but he allows fangraphs, bill james online, etc. to use it. But I’m not even sure it is a formula; I would think it’s an empirical matrix.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  89. GW

    [quote name=mb21]What makes you say that?[/quote]http://awfulannouncing.blogspot.com/2008/06/whos-ready-for-some-joe-morgan-trivia.html

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  90. fang2415

    Goddamn it Marmol, since when do hitters make contact off of you?

    Anyway, I don’t think LI is proprietary since it should be derivable as long as you have the linear weights.

    I like it most for the game graphs. The different numbers for players are just for different things, e.g., pinch-hitting. FSM knows there’s plenty of stats everywhere that I’ve learned to ignore so I don’t mind having a few more.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  91. fang2415

    Ahem, now that my full brain is back… LI isn’t too important for players since it’s so situational (i.e., not predictive). But it’s a hoot for watching games — it’s the vertical bars at the bottom of graphs like this one. If there’s one stat I’d love to see on TV during games, LI might be it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  92. fang2415

    Ah, reading that Tango article I linked, I see that there’s at least two possible recipes for LI. So maybe they can differ by 1.5 or whatever at the upper end. Meh. I still wish fangraphs printed all their formulas, since hardly any of their stuff’s proprietary.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment