Cubs to work out Yoennis Cespedes

In News And Rumors by dmick89216 Comments

The 26-year old Yoennis Cespedes will be playing in Major League Baseball at some point soon. Several teams are interested and the Cubs are one of them.

The Cubs will have a private workout with the 26-year-old outfielder, who is considered to be the best player in a generation to come out of Cuba. The Cubs will have plenty of competition if they decide to pursue the five-tool outfielder. The Red Sox, Phillies, Indians, Blue Jays, Pirates, Rangers, Tigers, Nationals, Athletics, Marlins and Yankees are reportedly interested in him as well, and he worked out for the Marlins front office on Thursday.

Cespedes is expected to get a deal similar to or higher than that of Aroldis Chapman ($30 million). Chapman hasn’t worked out as many hoped, but the Reds were aggressive and got a guy with a very high ceiling and it didn’t cost them as much as a player with a similar ceiling would on the free agent market. I was irritated that the Cubs didn’t pursue Chapman so I’m very excited to see the Cubs at least kicking the tires on Cespedes.

If you haven’t seen the video that made Cespedes famous, you should watch it. He’s a freak of nature.


Share this Post

Comments

  1. fang2415

    [quote name=alf]Hey Fang, along with BFS, the Astros also got Bixler![/quote]Did you know that I know somebody else named Bixler? Or did you just think I might find it interesting? (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. mb21

    [quote name=Rodrigo Ramirez]Do we know his real age is 26? Guess I’m interested because he might need some minor league time.[/quote]No idea if he’s actually 26. Don’t know if they’ll ever know.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Rice Cube

    How long was Aroldis Chapman’s deal for? I’m cool with a similar gamble. If he has more power Cubs can probably stick him in a corner with Brett Jackson staying in CF. Cool.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. mb21

    Aroldis Chapman lhp
    6 years/$30.25M (2010-15)

    6 years/$30.25M (2010-15)
    signed by Cincinnati as an amateur free agent 1/11/10
    $16.25M signing bonus ($1.5M at signing; $1.5M each Nov. 1, 2010-13; $1.25M each Nov. 1, 2014-20)
    10:$1M, 11:$1M, 12:$2M, 13:$2M, 14:$3M, 15:$5M player option
    Chapman must decide whether to accept or decline 2015 player option within 5 days after end of 2014 World Series
    if Chapman qualifies for arbitration after 2012, $5M is converted to a bonus and he becomes arbitration-eligible
    if Chapman qualifies for arbitration after 2013, $3M is converted to a bonus and he becomes arbitration-eligible
    defected from Cuba to Netherlands 7/1/09
    agent: Rodney Fernandez, Hendricks Sports

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. ACT

    [quote name=Rice Cube]How long was Aroldis Chapman’s deal for? I’m cool with a similar gamble. If he has more power Cubs can probably stick him in a corner with Brett Jackson staying in CF. Cool.[/quote]I don’t know about power, but his Core Strength is off the charts.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Smokestack Lightning

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Weekly Tebow update: can’t pass for shit, but Denver wins anyway.[/quote]
    2-8 69 Yds 1 TD QB rating…102.6

    (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. GBTS

    I like that Thom Brennaman intimated that the Lions got screwed on that fumble. Yes, the team that does not pick the ball up is clearly entitled to it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Smokestack Lightning]2-8 69 Yds 1 TD QB rating…102.6

    (dying laughing)[/quote]If anyone needed a final piece of proof that QB rating is the batting average of football stats, this is it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]Fukudome already had dibs on that one.[/quote]Fukudome was Fooky. BFS is Fuckey. Don’t you know anything? (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. fang2415

    [quote name=fang2415]Did you know that I know somebody else named Bixler? Or did you just think I might find it interesting? (dying laughing)[/quote]Right, got your email. (dying laughing).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Matt Stafford ————-> fat, whiny[/quote]I can’t argue with you today.

    Although his receivers have been off.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rice Cube]I can’t argue with you today.

    Although his receivers have been off.[/quote]Yes. Pretty funny how the Lions are doing whatever they can to get Pettigrew and Johnson matched up on Conte’s side of the field. But now that he’s Lovie’s Guy™, he’ll play out the string.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Mercurial Outfielder

    The Lions are dirty, weakassed motherfuckers. Fuck that team. They can dish it out, but they can’t handle it. Fuck you, DET.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]The weeniefication of the NFL continues. Fucking Gooddell and his mamby pamby BS.[/quote]The Briggs personal foul I presume. I thought he just stood there. The one at the beginning of the game where Peppers almost ripped the guy’s head off in forcing the fumble was much more egregious.

    FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Looks like the Bears guy started that fight. But Stafford still sucks.[/quote]Nope. Stafford yanked Moore down by his fucking helmet, then got punched his fat face, as he deserved. He could have broken Moore’s neck with that shit.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Nope. Stafford yanked Moore down by his fucking helmet, then got punched his fat face, as he deserved. He could have broken Moore’s neck with that shit.[/quote]Huh. I just realized they didn’t call a foul on Stafford. That’s baffling.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]EAT A BAG OF FROZEN LIZARD DICKS, STAFFORD[/quote]They only have the canned lizard dicks here in Topeka.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Huh. I just realized they didn’t call a foul on Stafford. That’s baffling.[/quote]And they ejected Moore, but gave Stafford no penalty. But when the league looks at that tape, best believe Fuckpants Fatface is gonna make a significant donation to the league. I’m guessing 25-50K.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]I’m not sure Chris Conte knows what he’s supposed to do when the ball is thrown.[/quote]Luckily the opponent is self-destructing to bail him out.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]Is that like one less than 70?[/quote]Depends on whether you want or need the answer.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Berselius

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]b, did Carimi play any LT at WIS?[/quote]
    IIRC that’s all he played at WI. I think he stepped in around when Joe Thomas left, though my perception of time is pretty terrible.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Berselius]IIRC that’s all he played at WI. I think he stepped in around when Joe Thomas left, though my perception of time is pretty terrible.[/quote]That’s good news. I think when he come back, he might take over for Webb at LT, with Louis playing so well at RT.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. Berselius

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]That’s good news. I think when he come back, he might take over for Webb at LT, with Louis playing so well at RT.[/quote]
    I was really surprised when I saw that the Bears were going to play him at RT earlier this year. When you have 2 shitty tackles, why not play the rookie you drafted at the position he’s used to playing.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Berselius]I was really surprised when I saw that the Bears were going to play him at RT earlier this year. When you have 2 shitty tackles, why not play the rookie you drafted at the position he’s used to playing.[/quote]Because he was the only one they viewed as competent at RT.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. Rodrigo Ramirez

    Chris Williams messed up his wrist during the game. Having surgery as we speak. No timetable on return. Damn, just when the OL was becoming respectable.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. Suburban kid 22

    [quote name=GW]http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2011/11/cubs-hire-shiraz-rehman-as-an-asst-to-the-gm/[/quote]Cool. Even more smrt guys.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. Berselius

    [quote name=GW]http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2011/11/cubs-hire-shiraz-rehman-as-an-asst-to-the-gm/[/quote]The Randy Bush vs Shiraz Rehman assistant GM vs assistant to the GM will be grist for plenty of jokes (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. GBTS

    The NFL could use Lance Briggs’ hit on Calvin Johnson as an instructional video on how to properly make contact per their own rules. Led with the shoulder, didn’t contact his helmet, didn’t launch himself off the ground.

    Naturally, he was still flagged. The NFL is a joke.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. Suburban kid 22

    [quote name=Suburban kid 22]No need to insult him like that.[/quote]So, nobody else copped that this guy’s name is Yo Anus.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=GBTS]The NFL could use Lance Briggs’ hit on Calvin Johnson as an instructional video on how to properly make contact per their own rules. Led with the shoulder, didn’t contact his helmet, didn’t launch himself off the ground.

    Naturally, he was still flagged. The NFL is a joke.[/quote]
    In the Texas/Mizzou game, a Texas DB dropped a PERFECT form tackle on a Mizzou runner on third down. Wound up, put his head down and launched right at his sternum.

    Right as he did that, the Mizzou runner dipped down, resulting in a helmet to helmet hit.

    Personal foul, defense, No. 4. 15 yards. Next play, TD.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]In the Texas/Mizzou game, a Texas DB dropped a PERFECT form tackle on a Mizzou runner on third down. Wound up, put his head down and launched right at his sternum.

    Right as he did that, the Mizzou runner dipped down, resulting in a helmet to helmet hit.

    Personal foul, defense, No. 4. 15 yards. Next play, TD.[/quote]
    Cool story, bro.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. fang2415

    [quote name=Suburban kid 22]So, nobody else copped that this guy’s name is Yo Anus.[/quote]After four years of cheering for Fuck-You-Do-Me, things like that have no meaning for us any more.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  33. fang2415

    [quote name=Suburban kid 22]So, nobody else copped that this guy’s name is Yo Anus.[/quote]Although it would still be amusing to see him, Kosuke, and Pujols end up on the same team.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  34. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]The Randy Bush vs Shiraz Rehman assistant GM vs assistant to the GM will be grist for plenty of jokes (dying laughing)[/quote]Greg Maddux was an assistant to the GM. I don’t really understand the difference, but I’m sure there is one. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  35. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]Greg Maddux was an assistant to the GM. I don’t really understand the difference, but I’m sure there is one. (dying laughing)[/quote]My hypothesis is that the assistant GM actually has GM-ish duties like setting up transactions, while the assistant to the GM does other baseball-related tasks that are not transaction-driven.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  36. Aisle424

    [quote name=WaLi]Can anyone with chemical background explain why sulfuric acid solution has a freezing point that looks like this?

    [/quote]Because that is how God intended it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  37. Rice Cube

    [quote name=ACT]http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7233005/mlb-labor-talks-sides-close-oking-draft-tweaks-sources-say
    me ———> sad[/quote]Eww. If going above bonus restrictions is going to result in a penalty tax, I wonder how much that tax will be as the Cubs may still be willing to pay that penalty to get someone they really want.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  38. WaLi

    [quote name=ACT]http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7233005/mlb-labor-talks-sides-close-oking-draft-tweaks-sources-say
    me ———> sad[/quote]

    The sides continue to make progress, with one official characterizing the talks “at the 10-yard-line.”

    10 yd line in the red zone and about to score? How much time is left? Would a field goal win or do you need to score?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  39. mb21

    [quote name=ACT]http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/article/future_managers_discuss_numbers/
    Huh. Not a lot to go on, but Alomar’s comment about matchup data makes me like him less.[/quote]I thought of all the candidates he was the one who said some dumb things. I thought the others sounded OK all things considered, but it was like Alomar went out of his way to disqualify from himself the job. Based on the bits I heard I cannot imagine that is who Thoyer wants leading this team. Maddux sounded the best overall, but Thoyer has worked with Sveum and know that he’s statistically inclined (more so than most coaches anyway). I’d be surprised it’s not Sveum, Maddux or Francona.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  40. mb21

    Based on some of the quotes Tango highlights, I don’t think there’s any doubt that Alomar isn’t getting the job. For one thing, he has the least amount of coaching experience of any of the four candidates. He’s obviously less interested in using statistics than any of the others.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  41. mb21

    [quote name=ACT]Why do you think it won’t be Mackanin?[/quote]It could be. I think I’ve been dismissive of him when I probably shouldn’t have been. He clearly hit in a couple of topics that the front office would love to hear from a manager so it’s possible. I’d just much prefer the Cubs someone younger than 60. Almoar is 45, Sveum is 47 and Maddux is 50.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  42. mb21

    It’s worth noting that this is what MacKinan said:

    ‘‘Any tool you can use to succeed, you better use it,” he said. ‘‘Video. Statistics. Let’s face it – statistics mean something. It’s not just a number. If a guy’s a .300 hitter, if he’s a .250 hitter, that’s what he is. That gives you an overall general look at what kind of hitter he is, and then you can delve deeper into leveraged indexes and ways of looking how he’s been used and his replacement value and things like that.

    I don’t know if that’s the answer that they were exactly looking for. A .250 hitter is a .250 hitter as he says, but that .250 doesn’t tell us a whole lot. If all the information we had was a player’s batting average then we could probably get a pretty good idea of who the best players were. We’d miss a lot.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  43. Aisle424

    It sounded like Mackanin was trying to sound very on board with the advanced analytics without actually knowing much about them.

    Like when my users always ask if the problem they are having with their computer could be the “firewall.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  44. ACT

    Mackanin threw out a couple of buzzwords without apparently understanding them. It’s leverage (no d) indexes, and he seems to misunderstand what “replacement value” means.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  45. binky

    [quote name=mb21]It’s worth noting that this is what MacKinan said:

    I don’t know if that’s the answer that they were exactly looking for. A .250 hitter is a .250 hitter as he says, but that .250 doesn’t tell us a whole lot. If all the information we had was a player’s batting average then we could probably get a pretty good idea of who the best players were. We’d miss a lot.[/quote]Sounds like the rest of the quote implies that he knows that BA is insufficient, but thinks of it more like a starting place? I assume that’s what “leveraged indexes” and “replacement value” imply. I saw some discussion on Facebook between a friend and a guy I didn’t know where the guy was saying he didn’t want Sveum at all. He didn’t give any reasons. To me, it’s a tossup. I’m fine with them picking Sveum or Sandberg or Antonio Sabato, Jr., if they think he’s the right guy. Lou was already old when they brought him in. He did an okay job, I thought. Toward the end he maybe was phoning it in, though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  46. ACT

    Then again, it’s hard to know what to make from such short soundbites, and I think that being open to statistics is far more important for a manager than having a deep understanding of them.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  47. binky

    [quote name=Aisle424]It sounded like Mackanin was trying to sound very on board with the advanced analytics without actually knowing much about them.

    Like when my users always ask if the problem they are having with their computer could be the “firewall.”[/quote]The people my wife has to work with don’t even get this far. One lady thought the mouse with the “square connector” was only for laptops.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  48. ACT

    Personally, I have no a dog in this hunt. I doubt the difference between the best and worst candidate is significant enough to get worked up over.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  49. binky

    [quote name=ACT]Then again, it’s hard to know what to make from such short soundbites, and I think that being open to statistics is far more important for a manager than having a deep understanding of them.[/quote]If he’s willing to learn, that could be good. Everyone has to start somewhere. Maybe he doesn’t know it as well at the moment, but is delving. It took me a long time to figure out what the hell WAR and especially FIP meant. I had to look it up every time. I’m starting to get it now.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  50. Rice Cube

    [quote name=josh]Sounds like the rest of the quote implies that he knows that BA is insufficient, but thinks of it more like a starting place? I assume that’s what “leveraged indexes” and “replacement value” imply. I saw some discussion on Facebook between a friend and a guy I didn’t know where the guy was saying he didn’t want Sveum at all. He didn’t give any reasons. To me, it’s a tossup. I’m fine with them picking Sveum or Sandberg or Antonio Sabato, Jr., if they think he’s the right guy. Lou was already old when they brought him in. He did an okay job, I thought. Toward the end he maybe was phoning it in, though.[/quote]Maybe he’d put some butts in seats by managing with his shirt off.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  51. binky

    [quote name=ACT]Personally, I have no a dog in this hunt. I doubt the difference between the best and worst candidate is significant enough to get worked up over.[/quote]I just wish they’d pick so we could move on. I know the off-season probably goes way too fast for GMs and way to slow for fans.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  52. binky

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Maybe he’d put some butts in seats by managing with his shirt off.[/quote]That might be more valuable than the management strategy, when you get down to it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  53. mb21

    [quote name=ACT]Then again, it’s hard to know what to make from such short soundbites, and I think that being open to statistics is far more important for a manager than having a deep understanding of them.[/quote]Exactly. All I can safely say is that Alomar sounded much dumber than you’d think Thoyer would like to hire. Sveum has been known for being fond of sabermetrics. Maddux is known as a great pitching coach and is apparently open to all information. MacKanin said something interesting, but he may have just been throwing out key words on purpose.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  54. mb21

    [quote name=ACT]Personally, I have no a dog in this hunt. I doubt the difference between the best and worst candidate is significant enough to get worked up over.[/quote]No, definitely not. I would like it to be one of the 3 I mentioned above. I really don’t want Alomar. MacKinan would be OK. I’m not going to get worked up over the Cubs hiring any of them.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  55. bubblesdachimp

    Even if that happens, Jackson should push his way to Wrigley Field in short order. He has the upside of Jim Edmonds at the plate, if not the same Gold Glove ability in center field.

    sign me the fuck up

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  56. mb21

    Brett Jackson

    Scouting Report: With solid to above-average tools across the board, as well as the ability to stay in center field, Jackson is a potential all-star. His power stands out the most, as he has the bat speed, loft and strength to drive balls out of the park to all fields. He has become much more selective at the plate than he was in college, waiting for pitches he can punish and taking walks when pitchers won’t challenge him. Chicago would like to see him get a little more aggressive and attack more often early in the count. He’s not a pure hitter, but he does have a compact swing and doesn’t get himself out by chasing pitches out of the zone. Some scouts think Jackson’s stroke can get too mechanical and believe he swings and misses too much to hit much better than .260 or .270. He pulls off pitches at times, and his strikeout rate spiked to a career-high 30 percent in Triple-A. Jackson isn’t a blazer, but he has plus speed that enables him to get the job done on the bases and in the outfield. He knows when to pick his spots as a basestealer, succeeding at a 76 percent rate in the minors. Likewise, he gets good jumps and takes nice routes in the outfield. He has played all three outfield positions in pro ball, and his average, accurate arm is enough for right field if he eventually moves to a corner. His steady demeanor and work ethic are assets that have rubbed off on his teammates, such as 2007 first-round pick Josh Vitters.

    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  57. mb21

    I’m guessing Jackson hits closer to .250/.350/.450. If he can play average or better defense in CF that’s pretty damn good, but that .250 average is going to drive fans nuts.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  58. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]I’m guessing Jackson hits closer to .250/.350/.450. If he can play average or better defense in CF that’s pretty damn good, but that .250 average is going to drive fans nuts.[/quote]That .250 doesn’t tell us a whole lot.

    /Mackanin’d

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  59. ACT

    BAm’s projected lineups are pretty worthless, but I find it amusing that they have Vitters in LF:

    PROJECTED 2015
    LINEUP
    Catcher Geovany Soto
    First Base Dan Vogelbach
    Second Base Zeke DeVoss
    Third Base Javier Baez
    Shortstop Starlin Castro
    Left Field Josh Vitters
    Center Field Matt Szczur
    Right Field Brett Jackson
    No. 1 Starter Matt Garza
    No. 2 Starter Andrew Cashner
    No. 3 Starter Trey McNutt
    No. 4 Starter Dillon Maples
    No. 5 Starter Dae-Eun Rhee
    Closer Carlos Marmol

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  60. mb21

    Javier Baez

    The Future: Baez has the highest ceiling in the system and could move quickly. His bat eventually should fit into the No. 3 slot in Chicago’s lineup and should provide enough offense for any position. He’ll head to low Class A Peoria at age 19.

    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  61. mb21

    Matt Szczur:

    The Future: After wearing down from his nonstop baseball/football grind in the second half, Szczur could be primed for a breakout. He’ll start 2012 at Double-A Tennessee and could reach Chicago in 2013. He’ll eventually push Brett Jackson to right field.

    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  62. mb21

    The Future: McNutt remained inconsistent in the Arizona Fall League, and he could wind up as a late-inning reliever if he can’t improve his changeup and command. If it all comes together, he could be a No. 2 starter, similar to what Chicago hopes for from 2008 first-rounder Andrew Cashner. Ticketed for a return to Tennessee, McNutt could finish 2012 in the majors.

    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  63. Rice Cube

    If you have a speedy on-base-y guy in Szczur patrolling CF and a decent defender and similarly on-base-y guy in BJax hanging out in RF, that’s a pretty good coverage defensively and a pretty decent top-of-the-lineup going forward. Exciting, assuming they perform as expected.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  64. mb21

    Scouting Report: Maples has a pair of plus pitches in his heavy 92-96 mph fastball and hard curveball. There’s little question about the quality of his arm, though many scouts worry about his mechanics. Though he’s athletic, he has a non-athletic delivery with a short arm action and a stiff, upright finish. That could lead to problems with his command—he locates his curve better than his fastballءnd stress on his shoulder. For their part, the Cubs don’t have any significant concerns and won’t make any major adjustments. They’ll have him focus on improving his fastball location and developing a changeup.

    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  65. Berselius

    I need to get on twitter to kill all the optimism generated by BA (dying laughing).

    We need to write an OV handbook where we list the top 10 players and say they will all fail (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  66. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Berselius]I need to get on twitter to kill all the optimism generated by BA (dying laughing).

    We need to write an OV handbook where we list the top 10 players and say they will all fail (dying laughing)[/quote]Don’t you like anything?

    I see Szczur’s 2011 didn’t end so well in Daytona, but small sample size blah blah blah.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  67. ACT

    [quote name=Berselius]I need to get on twitter to kill all the optimism generated by BA (dying laughing).
    [/quote]That’s one reason I think those “projected lineups” do more harm than good.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  68. ACT

    [quote name=mb21]Vitters still in the top 10? (dying laughing)[/quote]Top 10 in this system is no great shakes. Vitters is still expected to be a big leaguer at some point, so the lower end of the top 10 seems about right.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  69. mb21

    [quote name=ACT]That’s one reason I think those “projected lineups” do more harm than good.[/quote]Yep. In 4 years people will say “the Cubs overhyped Dae-Eun Rhee. We were told he could be a star in the rotation and he’s not even reached MLB. Liars”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  70. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]I need to get on twitter to kill all the optimism generated by BA (dying laughing).

    We need to write an OV handbook where we list the top 10 players and say they will all fail (dying laughing)[/quote]I’m on board with that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  71. mb21

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Don’t you like anything?

    I see Szczur’s 2011 didn’t end so well in Daytona, but small sample size blah blah blah.[/quote]BA made a good point about how Szczur had been playing baseball and football for a year straight with little or no break. Not surprising that he’d perform poorly considering that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  72. mb21

    Scouting Report: Dolis reminds scouts of Marmol, and the similarities became more striking when Dolis became a full-time reliever in 2011. He can make hitters look silly with a 93-100 mph fastball with heavy sink and a mid-80s slider with hard bite. His stuff should have played up in shorter stints, but Dolis’ strikeout rate dipped to a career-low 5.9 per nine innings. That’s because he focused so much on his command, his biggest shortcoming, that he pounded the bottom of the strike zone and generated groundouts rather than strikeouts. He has a clean, high three-quarters delivery that gives him good downward plane with his pitches, but he still needs to throw more strikes.

    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  73. binky

    [quote name=mb21]The scouting report for Castillo can be summed up with this:

    So does that mean he can barely move?[/quote]It means he’ll never catch Zeno’s tortoise.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  74. Jack Nugent

    From what I’ve seen of Jackson, which is actually a pretty fair amount, I’d say BA is right on with that scouting report. Honestly, I’m not sure if I would quibble with anything about it. Glad to hear they’re as high on Jackson as I am. Even if he’s a .260 hitter, I think he’s gonna be a very valuable player. His impeding promotion is easily what has me most excited about the 2012 season.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  75. Rodrigo Ramirez

    Cubs 1st round picks from 02-05 (dying laughing)

    Year Player, Position 2011 Org.
    2002 Bobby Brownlie, rhp Out of baseball
    2003 Ryan Harvey, of Red Sox
    2004 Grant Johnson, rhp (2nd round) Out of baseball
    2005 Mark Pawelek, lhp Out of baseball

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  76. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rodrigo Ramirez]Cubs 1st round picks from 02-05 (dying laughing)

    Year Player, Position 2011 Org.
    2002 Bobby Brownlie, rhp Out of baseball
    2003 Ryan Harvey, of Red Sox
    2004 Grant Johnson, rhp (2nd round) Out of baseball
    2005 Mark Pawelek, lhp Out of baseball[/quote]Why stop at 2005? The LULZ continue through the Hayden Simpson pick!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  77. WaLi

    [quote name=Rodrigo Ramirez]Cubs 1st round picks from 02-05 (dying laughing)

    Year Player, Position 2011 Org.
    2002 Bobby Brownlie, rhp Out of baseball
    2003 Ryan Harvey, of Red Sox
    2004 Grant Johnson, rhp (2nd round) Out of baseball
    2005 Mark Pawelek, lhp Out of baseball[/quote]In the Cubs defense, Harvey had an outstanding AVG and Brownlie, Johnson, Pawelek all had very low ERA’s when drafted. It’s just variance that they all busted.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  78. mb21

    2006 was Colvin (turned out better than expected, but was dumber than shit at the time), Vitters (still could work out), Cashner, Jackson, Simpson and Baez.

    2001 was Mark Prior.

    Ignoring Bobby Brrownlie since he was a 2nd round pick, here are the good picks at the time: Prior, Vitters, Jackson, Baez.

    Not all the rest were bad. I don’t think Ryan Harvey was a bad pick at all. Cashner wasn’t a bad pick either.

    Still, you’d expect to have more than 4 first rounds picks in a decade that were good decisions at the time.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  79. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]2006 was Colvin (turned out better than expected, but was dumber than shit at the time), Vitters (still could work out), Cashner, Jackson, Simpson and Baez.

    2001 was Mark Prior.

    Ignoring Bobby Brrownlie since he was a 2nd round pick, here are the good picks at the time: Prior, Vitters, Jackson, Baez.

    Not all the rest were bad. I don’t think Ryan Harvey was a bad pick at all. Cashner wasn’t a bad pick either.

    Still, you’d expect to have more than 4 first rounds picks in a decade that were good decisions at the time.[/quote]Yeah, the Colvin and Simpson picks aside, I think this is a tale of player development FAIL rather than drafting FAIL.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  80. Smokestack Lightning

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Woah, Matt Kemp is going to get an eight-year extension. Are the Dodgers allowed to spend money? (dying laughing)[/quote]
    Take him out of the free agent pool for 2013, and you have exactly zero top tier bats under the age of 30 hitting the market. If the Superfriends are serious about every year being sacred or, fuck that, just putting a team on the field worth plunking down dollars to watch, then with the minor league system being what it is they’re going to have to do something big in free agency to rebuild the offense, and they’d better do it now choosing between Pujols and Fielder.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  81. Aisle424

    “You know, the only thing that scares me about Joe Walsh is his anti-worker ideologies, and his total disregard for facts,” Rakestraw replied.

    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  82. Rice Cube

    [quote name=josh]Who?

    Who?[/quote]
    Who #1 = Craig Kimbrel, Atlanta closer.

    Who #2 = Jeremy Hellickson, Rays starter.

    I’m not sure I’m okay with Who #1.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  83. Rice Cube

    Kimbrel was worth about 3 wins, so I think he’s deserving of votes, but unanimously? Not sure I like that.

    /doesn’t like anything’d

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  84. binky

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Who #1 = Craig Kimbrel, Atlanta closer.

    Who #2 = Jeremy Hellickson, Rays starter.

    I’m not sure I’m okay with Who #1.[/quote]In my head I was thinking “Craig Kimbrel” but that’s exactly as much as I knew about him. I figured he was probably a pitcher of some sort.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  85. GW

    [quote name=WaLi]Can anyone with chemical background explain why sulfuric acid solution has a freezing point that looks like this?

    [/quote]
    I don’t remember exactly. You’ve got the freezing point of water on the left axis and the freezing point of sulfuric on the right. The colligative properties of a solvent dictate that the freezing point depresses in proportion to the number of particles in solution. In the case of sulfuric acid, possible particles are H (x2), SO4 -2, HSO4-, and H2SO4.

    Start at left axis. Addition of acid to the water will result in the more or less complete dissociation of the acid into two hydrogens ions and a sulfate. The absolute minima will correspond to the point beyond which the number of particles in solution decreases, as hydrogens are driven to associate with sulfates as HSO4 and H2SO4.

    If we start at the right axis and add water, we will get severe acid burns. But conceptually, I’m guessing the two local minima correspond to maximal solvation of each of the protons. Insert some hand-waving here.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  86. GW

    Colligative properties are why salt, which forms separate sodium and chloride ions, is better than sand at de-icing the roads, btw.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  87. binky

    [quote name=GW]Colligative properties are why salt, which forms separate sodium and chloride ions, is better than sand at de-icing the roads, btw.[/quote]Is that also why Coke is better than Pepsi?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  88. WaLi

    [quote name=GW]I don’t remember exactly. You’ve got the freezing point of water on the left axis and the freezing point of sulfuric on the right. The colligative properties of a solvent dictate that the freezing point depresses in proportion to the number of particles in solution. In the case of sulfuric acid, possible particles are H (x2), SO4 -2, HSO4-, and H2SO4.

    Start at left axis. Addition of acid to the water will result in the more or less complete dissociation of the acid into two hydrogens ions and a sulfate. The absolute minima will correspond to the point beyond which the number of particles in solution decreases, as hydrogens are driven to associate with sulfates as HSO4 and H2SO4.

    If we start at the right axis and add water, we will get severe acid burns. But conceptually, I’m guessing the two local minima correspond to maximal solvation of each of the protons. Insert some hand-waving here.[/quote]Interesting, thanks. We handle 93% and sometimes 96% here. I was updating some safety information and had to find the freezing point for 96% and came across that graph and found it intriguing.

    On another note, how the hell does freezing point and melting point mean the same thing (dying laughing)
    Obviously it is because it depends on what phase you are coming from, but it is annoying when you are searching for freezing point information but can’t find it because you should be searching for melting point (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  89. binky

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]READ THE PREVIOUS THREADS.

    /Rob G.[/quote]I went through the last three comment threads and didn’t see anything on this.

    Who is Rob G?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  90. Rice Cube

    [quote name=josh]I went through the last three comment threads and didn’t see anything on this.

    Who is Rob G?[/quote]You didn’t read every post.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  91. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=josh]I went through the last three comment threads and didn’t see anything on this.

    Who is Rob G?[/quote]Rob G. runs a Cubs blog and is constantly castigating people for bringing up previously discussed topics.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  92. binky

    [quote name=Rice Cube]You didn’t read every post.[/quote]I did do a search for “pap” and “phil” but found nothing. and I just got the MLBTR rumor like 20 minutes ago, so I assumed I was breaking the story, Cubs reporter style.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  93. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=josh]I did do a search for “pap” and “phil” but found nothing. and I just got the MLBTR rumor like 20 minutes ago, so I assumed I was breaking the story, Cubs reporter style.[/quote]In fact, you did break it Cubs reporter style. 2 days late. (dying laughing) I’m assuming the deal was finalized today, though. I heard 4 years/$50 mil a couple days ago. Are those the numbers MLBTR has?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  94. Rice Cube

    [quote name=josh]Supposedly the deal was for 4 years/$50,000,058.

    The $58 being a good luck thing for Pappy.[/quote]That was probably the kicker. Think of how many Philly cheesesteaks you can buy with $58!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  95. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=GW]http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/college/chi-big-ten-takes-paterno-name-off-trophy-20111114,0,3662926.story[/quote]Outstanding.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  96. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=josh]Mark Ellis signing on with the Dodgers. Unless that’s already been discussed, then I didn’t say anything.[/quote]Nice snark.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  97. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=melissa]The political talk will stop now! (dying laughing)[/quote]I AM TIRED OF THIS CRAP! GIVE ME MORE COFFEE!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  98. Berselius

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]I AM TIRED OF THIS CRAP! GIVE ME MORE COFFEE![/quote]
    [quote name=melissa]make it a decaf[/quote]
    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  99. binky

    [quote name=melissa]The political talk will stop now! (dying laughing)[/quote]In this situation, who can we most accurately say got “tea bagged”?

    I’m sorry that joke wrote itself. I apologize for my fingers.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  100. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=josh]I’ve been taking notes.[/quote]Truly, you are Inspector Javert to my Ignatius O’Reilly.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  101. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=josh]In this situation, who can we most accurately say got “tea bagged”?

    I’m sorry that joke wrote itself. I apologize for my fingers.[/quote]FLAGGED

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  102. melissa

    I’m ready to get back to focusing on what’s important in the world, like Theo and the Superfriends. Any background info on the new Dwight Schrute of the Cubs?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  103. mb21

    [quote name=melissa]I’m ready to get back to focusing on what’s important in the world, like Theo and the Superfriends. Any background info on the new Dwight Schrute of the Cubs?[/quote]Sullivan, Gordo and Miles will have some info in about 6 months.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  104. WenningtonsGorillaCock

    In risk of being accused of not reading every comment:

    “Cubs announce they’ve named Shiraz Rehman assistant to the GM. Had spent six seasons with the D’Backs.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  105. WenningtonsGorillaCock

    [quote name=mb21]What purpose does disbanding the union accomplish?[/quote]Can now sue the NBA under anti-trust laws and challenge the lockout.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  106. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=melissa]I’m ready to get back to focusing on what’s important in the world, like Theo and the Superfriends. Any background info on the new Dwight Schrute of the Cubs?[/quote]Players now paid in Schrutebucks.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  107. Berselius

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Players now paid in Schrutebucks.[/quote]
    That currency is in danger of defaulting, thanks to the actions of Creed Bratton. In an uncertain economy, the only stable investment is Stanley Nickels. Or porn.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  108. Aisle424

    [quote name=melissa]I’m ready to get back to focusing on what’s important in the world, like Theo and the Superfriends. Any background info on the new Dwight Schrute of the Cubs?[/quote]Fact: Bears like beets.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  109. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]That currency is in danger of defaulting, thanks to the actions of Creed Bratton. In an uncertain economy, the only stable investment is Stanley Nickels. Or alien porn.[/quote].

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  110. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Berselius]That currency is in danger of defaulting, thanks to the actions of Creed Bratton. In an uncertain economy, the only stable investment is Stanley Nickels. Or porn.[/quote]Creeds were discovered to actually just be sprouted mung beans.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  111. WaLi

    [quote name=melissa]I’m ready to get back to focusing on what’s important in the world, like Theo and the Superfriends. Any background info on the new Dwight Schrute of the Cubs?[/quote]He is enforcing a new “Accountability Booster”. If the Cubs are caught with either a TOOTBLAN or sacrifice bunting, a mistake is registered. When five mistakes are made within a week, you get a home run. When you get a home run, you are out. Once the Cubs are out, incrimanating emails will automatically be sent to Bud Selig which will force him to dismantle the Cubs.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  112. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]Astros ———-> AL in 2013

    Crane ————–> got his $50m discount for agreeing[/quote]I should have bought the Astros. I could do so much with that $50 million.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  113. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]Any word on whether or not there will still be divisions?[/quote]www.willtherestillbedivisions.com

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  114. Mario M Escoto

    [quote name=mb21]No idea if he’s actually 26. Don’t know if they’ll ever know.[/quote]Cespedes is 26…listen Sir…nothing personal, but Cespedes is Cuban , not Dominican…Cubans from Cuba never ever had an Issue with Roids or Age….all of that comes from here and the Dominicans who are the biggest Cheaters in the world..about 600 of them in the minors since 2005 have tested positive for Roids.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  115. Mario M Escoto

    Some of you are confussing places and names here…and the worst thing any of you can do is talk about something none of you know about it and that’s …Cuba’s Baseball.
    the reason Dominicana has MLB players by the Dozen is cheating and cuba hasn’t had a player drafted from the Island in 52 years….because of politics, but if you go back , since the very beggining , Cuba was the only country tat had 20/25/30 layers in the majors from Latin america since the early 1900…until the late 70’s….dominicans came a very few in the 50’s (2) and then in the late 70’s , almost 80’s….cuba and venezuela have better players than DR even with them having more…its just a bunch of body bags…despite the non drafting cuba has almost 30 MLB players…half of them Cuban Americans…if Afraud counts as dominican , we have the right to count Avila , Hosmer and chris perez as Cuban americans…among 15 other..like Valencia, andino, Ibanez, Arroyo, Arencibia, coello, Sean Rodriguez, Jay……..Gaby Sanchez…

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment