Cubs trade David DeJesus to Nationals

In News And Rumors, Transactions by dmick8915 Comments

chi_a_dejesus_mb2_600

According to Jon Heyman, the Cubs have traded David DeJesus to the Washington Nationals for a player to be named later. DeJesus spent a sizable amount of time on the DL this season, but in his year plus with the Cubs, he gave the Cubs a bit more than they paid for.

No word on whether there is money involved in the deal, but the Nationals now own a club option for $6.5 million on DeJesus next season. It's an option that will probably be exercised by the Nats.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Author
    dmick89

    sitrick wrote:

    Parks has a nice writeup of Baez in today’s Ten Pack if you have a B-Pro sub. Not sure if it’s kosher to post it here or not.

    I wouldn’t copy/paste the entire thing, but fair use is more than acceptable.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. sitrick

    The noteworthy bit:

    After an impressive run in the Florida State League, the blossoming we have eagerly anticipated has taken place after a promotion to Double-A, where Baez already has 26 extra-base hits in his first 40 games. Double-A is a test level, a separator level where pretenders are exposed and future major-league players are uncovered. It’s a small sample but a positive developmental step, and Baez is showing that he is not only prepared for the test but talented enough to excel against much older and wiser competition. He could be a star, a role 7 type with a middle-of-the-order bat and left-side chops in the field.

    That interview at Cubs Den was great too. Excellent stuff.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. sitrick

    Is the PTBNL thing a waiver issue, or are we just getting back someone fairly crappy? Surprised they’d salary dump DDJ.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. josh

    I gotta tell you, I don’t care. Not crazy about it? What’s David D going to be by the time this team can compete? Whole lotta nothing. What did I tell you guys about that koolaid? This team isn’t competing next year, and they need as high a draft pick as possible.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. GW

    @ josh:

    on the margins, losing more this year is a decent outcome, given the large cluster of bad teams near the bottom of the standings. on the whole, though, tanking in baseball is not all that productive. more brian bogusevic next year? blah…

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. sitrick

    josh wrote:

    I gotta tell you, I don’t care. Not crazy about it? What’s David D going to be by the time this team can compete? Whole lotta nothing. What did I tell you guys about that koolaid? This team isn’t competing next year, and they need as high a draft pick as possible.

    I’m less concerned about this than about getting proper value for assets. DDJ is a known quantity and a productive major league regular having a good year with team control for next year. That’s a fairly valuable commodity…PTBNL’s tend to be not terribly valuable guys.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. sitrick

    Role 7 is Parks-speak for a 70 overall player grade on the 20-80 scouting scale. A 7 is basically a perennial all star.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. josh

    @ sitrick:
    My main counterargument is *shrug*.

    My subcounterargument is that maybe the Cubes are harder up for money than we thought, or they think they have a bead on a young arm in the Nats org that they can steal away.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment