Jeff Samardzija is a better pitcher

In Commentary And Analysis, Facepalm by dmick89125 Comments

I wasn't buying it, but I'm now convinced that Jeff Samardzija is indeed a better pitcher. Samardzija had not started since midway through the 2010 season when he made 3 starts. He had a 6.19 ERA in those 3 games. Compare that to the 5.71 ERA he has through the same number of games this season. Much to my surprise, he has improved by about half a run per game.

Maybe not. He's allowed 7.02 RA so far this year and in 2010 it was only 6.19. He allowed 16 hits in 16 innings back in 2010. This year he's allowed 22 hits in 16.2 innings. As bad as things are for Samardzija right now, he can look back on those 3 starts in 2010 as the peak of his career as a starting pitcher.

The good news is that he is throwing more strikes this season. The bad news is that they're getting hit all over the field. In hindsight, it looks really stupid that I predicted Samardzija would win the Cy Young award. In my defense, I don't think anyone could have predicted this. I don't care what anyone says, Jeff Samardzija's failure so far is easily the most shocking thing in the 2012 MLB season.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. mb21

    @ Rice Cube:
    I had them at 68-70 entering the season, but I think 424 is going to be more accurate with his 62 win prediction. I don’t know what AC and berselius were thinking. They were drinking the spring training kool aid or something. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Aisle424

    mb21 wrote:

    I had them at 68-70 entering the season, but I think 424 is going to be more accurate with his 62 win prediction. I don’t know what AC and berselius were thinking. They were drinking the spring training kool aid or something. (dying laughing)

    That’s awesome. The prize is I get to keep all of the subscription revenue for the year, right?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. mb21

    @ Aisle424:
    I believe that’s correct, but I might have to protest. Samardzija winning the Cy Young was a lock and that appears like it won’t happen at this point. He must be injured so I should be able to pick again. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ mb21:
    In that vein, don’t look now but Randy Wells has not exactly been impressive at Iowa. His crappiness may be JefF7’s saving grace.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ mb21:
    You just need to artificially restrict your sample to encompass only those pitching outings which prove his transformation. Then you’ll see the truth.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Rice Cube

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:
    I think they have to be smart enough to know that they handed Sveum a pretty bad team and won’t fire him as long as he’s still good with the media and tries to teach the game right. Though the TOOTBLANs aren’t really helping his case.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. josh

    @ Rice Cube:
    I figure aggressive baserunning must be coming from up high, or they at least knew that was what he was going to teach. To be fair, you can’t teach guys good baserunning overnight. Castro has shown some improvement so far. That’s definitely a long-term goal. Plus, the Cubs did get handed a tough schedule this month.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Rice Cube

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:
    I think if Ricketts cared about the fans he wouldn’t put up new LED boards and be in discussions with the city to try to eventually throw a Jumbotron in Wrigley. He probably also would have told Theo and Jed to buy Pujols and Fielder. I didn’t used to think so but now I really do believe that the Rickettses want to do this right.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. josh

    @ Rice Cube:
    To be honest, I don’t want to see Rickets and fat stupid face for 5 years. Either he handed the reigns to Theo or he didn’t. I would hope he’s not involved on any decisions. The guy isn’t exactly an inspiring leader. He eventually got a good guy in there, but he sure did drag his feet long enough.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. GBTS

    I mean, if a veteran career .250 hitter goes like 2-9 in a series, I don’t think people would scream WHOA WHOA, SAMPLE SIZE.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. mb21

    Mercurial Outfielder wrote:

    You just need to artificially restrict your sample to encompass only those pitching outings which prove his transformation. Then you’ll see the truth.

    We may as well just look at the innings in which he hasn’t given up a run. I’ll bet his ERA in those situations is tied for a Major League best. F7 is a fuckin phenomenal pitcher.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. mb21

    jtsunami wrote:

    Screaming sample size and saying I told you so 3 starts in is a bit contradicting wouldn’t ya say?

    If this was the only sample size we have, yes, but we’re talking about a pitcher who sucked as a starter in the minor leagues, sucked in previous tries at the big league level and with the exception the last half of last season sucked as a reliever in his big league career. You’ve got suck, suck, suck, good and suck. The good part was as a reliever and was half a season. Jeff Samardzija sucked entering this season and he’s sucked so far this season.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Mercurial Outfielder

    jtsunami wrote:

    Screaming sample size and saying I told you so 3 starts in is a bit contradicting wouldn’t ya say?

    I am vast. I contain multitudes.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ ACT:
    He’s already accumulated as many WAR as Byrd was projected to accumulate over the course of the whole season.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. Mercurial Outfielder

    mb21 wrote:

    If this was the only sample size we have, yes, but we’re talking about a pitcher who sucked as a starter in the minor leagues, sucked in previous tries at the big league level and with the exception the last half of last season sucked as a reliever in his big league career. You’ve got suck, suck, suck, good and suck. The good part was as a reliever and was half a season. Jeff Samardzija sucked entering this season and he’s sucked so far this season.

    pace berselius, THIS

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. mb21

    GBTS wrote:

    I mean, if a veteran career .250 hitter goes like 2-9 in a series, I don’t think people would scream WHOA WHOA, SAMPLE SIZE.

    Exactly. F7 has a 5.2 RA in his big league career and most of that was as a reliever. If it was as a starter it would be about 6.2. That it’s just over 7 isn’t the least bit shocking.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. scot7209

    Mikeakaleroy:
    (dying laughing)!
    I’m thinking it may be more like one win against each non-division opponent this season so they still have an outside shot at that 1 out of 6 goal.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. scot7209

    This has gotten painful enough ALREADY that I can’t handle watching the games and have limited the extent of following each game to checking gametrax on fox sports webpage (my wife can’t handle the long strings of obscenities spewing out of me at the completion of each daily collapse).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. jtsunami

    GBTS wrote:

    Or is it just consistent with his large sample size?

    Well, I mean I believe in what mb preaches 90% of the time. However I feel too often that things are looked at in vaccuum. We have input from other sources that said something changed with JefF7. By and large, players stay same or progress/regress slowly over time. There are also rare circumstances where they change drastically.

    I thought a change in pitching philosophy, adding a pitch to his disposal, and a perhaps increase in his secondary stuff would work. We also had media outlets saying there was change (or transformation (dying laughing)). I just wanted to see what happened. I have no doubts that he’s a different pitcher than April of last year.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Berselius

    @ mb21:

    The hypothesis is that Jeff Samardzija is pitching differently, per the scouts, which we don’t have much in the way of quantifying without more data past this Magical Transformation Point. It’s a small sample size in determining whether the scouts were right or not. Obviously if you just look at stats alone this isn’t surprising at all.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. josh

    @ Berselius:
    Yeah, I agree. Too soon to call bullshit on his transformation. The team claims he hit the reset button. He deserves a chance to prove it, if only because several people have backed that claim, such as the manager, presumably the general manager, and the pitching coach. Maybe those guys are all idiots, but I don’t think we can say that with 100% certainty yet.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. scot7209

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:
    ….come to think of it that may be a fun mid-season match-up if the original cast members could be found.

    Do you think the Cubs could do some cool tricks ‘a la’ Harlem globetrotters but with baseballs?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ Berselius:
    Which is all I’ve ever been saying. Unless we get problematically selective with our endpoints, there’s no reliable data set that indicates he’s a different pitcher. All we have are the opinions of “scouts.” And his last two outings look remarkably similar to 99% of what he’s done in his professional career, which makes me wonder what they saw. He does seem to have done a lot of work on locating that good, hard sinker, and he’s added a 2-seamer, but the same lack of control and inability to keep the fastball down (the latter of which was in evidence even in his excellent first start) are still there, so I have some serious doubts about the probability of him being a much different pitcher than he’s been in the past.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. Berselius

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:

    I never thought we’d see Jeff Samardzija, All-Star. I figure that if he was for real his transformation would turn him into a league averageish pitcher. And they have shitty starts too. And problems with leaving balls up in the zone, etc. etc.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. scot7209

    @ Berselius:
    Damn…I can’t believe I missed that. They’re making everyone ELSE look like the Globetrotters.
    I’d like to be able to exclude Castro from that comment but until he stops committing an error every third game, on average, he’s there too.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ Berselius:
    Yeah, there’s nothing we’ve seen so far to suggest he couldn’t be an end of the rotation guy. But that’s probably his ceiling.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. mb21

    jtsunami wrote:

    I thought a change in pitching philosophy, adding a pitch to his disposal, and a perhaps increase in his secondary stuff would work. We also had media outlets saying there was change (or transformation (dying laughing)).

    This same stuff is said about anybody who just had half a good season. That’s the problem with it. I’ve asked people here and on twitter to come up with a list of players that managers had mentioned had changed and I’ll look at just how much they did change after the fact. I don’t believe that scouts can accurately predict this. I believe that managers and coaches are even worse at it. For every time they’re right they’re wrong about a dozen times. Or more.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. mb21

    @ Berselius:
    As I’ve mentioned before, I don’t trust their accuracy in any way. Whether right or wrong, I couldn’t care less what the scouts say. It means absolutely nothing to me. Over the years I’ve heard literally dozens of times about how so and so is changed. Last year it was about how Zambrano was a changed pitcher. I ignored them and I ignore them now. This year it was Samardzija, Barney, DeJesus, Marmol and Soriano who had become better players. It’s nonsense. I’ll ignore them next year when they tell us how Blake DeWitt, Jeff Baker, Bryan LaHair and Scott Maine are changed ballplayers.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. ACT

    Not having Utley or Howard has to hurt a bit. Also, their position players are geriatric (except for Utley replacement Galvis, who sucks at hitting).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. mb21

    So far this year Barney has a double, triple and a home run and I still find the idea that he added much of any additional power to be laughable. Here’s someone who has actually shown an increase in extra base hits like the scouts said and I still think they’re full of shit. I thought they were full of shit about how Marmol improved. Same thing with Soriano and the others. If the scouts are right, the Cubs are going to have a really good team this season. We should be excited.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. mb21

    What really bothers me is that this whole transformation thing can go on and on and on. Jeff Samardzija has transformed this year, but ends up sucking. Cubs say he’s transformed next year. Sucks again. And on and on. If we value what the scouts say now we’d have to value what they say in a year, two years or three years from now. If the Cubs play this right they could set it up so that F7 never has a sample size large enough to be valued based on that recent transformation.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. josh

    @ mb21:
    i really don’t care. Until they are fielding a team that matters, why nitpick their pet experiments? They play by the book, the book says they suck. Might as well try a few experiments.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  33. josh

    It’s not like the front office is going to say “fuck it, this season is a punt, so I told Sveum to play Samardzija. If he sucks, I fire his ass. Who cares?”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  34. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    I also think Sveum is in for the long haul. Epstein really wanted him. I watching a little of the Yu Darvish action, now that’s someone I wish the Cubs would have gotten. He and F7 would be the best 1-2 punch in MLB.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  35. Aisle424

    Berselius wrote:

    Looks like fangraphs is down. That will make writing this preview much more difficult (dying laughing)

    Just make wild assertions about the players’ attitudes with no actual supporting facts.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  36. Aisle424

    josh wrote:

    Are the Blackhawks eliminated? Can I stop almost remembering to listen to their games?

    Down 3-1 and unable to score on a power play to save their lives, so pretty much.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment