On Theo

In News And Rumors by Obstructed View StaffLeave a Comment

The following comment by Smokestack Lightning was such a good one that it deserves to be highlighted on the front page.

Quoting dylanj:

Friedman is my first choice simply because I think what he is doing is harder than what Theo did. Go write him a very very large check.

I have mad respect for Friedman too but to disregard “what Theo did” as not as impressive as Friedman is not, in my opinion, taking a hard look at what he’s built and how he’s done it.

The Red Sox minor league system has been a veritable gold mine for awhile now, and of the current productive core in place, only Adrian Gonzalez and Beckett didn’t come up through the system (and they were purchased with the system). That leaves Pedroia, Youkilis, Ellsbury, Lester, Papelbon, Bard, Buchholz. That’s a pretty goddamned good yield, and without the benefit of an endless stream of number one picks either.

As far as free agent signings go…yeah Theo’s hit and missed. But that’s every GM with dollars to spend. And to be fair here, most of the moves Theo made were lauded at the time (and many of them worked out too), including the current millstone being hung around his neck, John Lackey, who was a 4 WAR pitcher before he signed with Boston, was paid like a 4 WAR pitcher, and, in his first year, produced a 4 WAR season. That he cracked up this year and pitched like utter dogshit (as bad as he was, he still put up 1.5 WAR) wasn’t something anybody thought would happen as fast as it did. But hey, shit happens.

And as mb astutely pointed out, who is to say Friedman would fare any better with a bigger payroll? It’s not a guarantee that he would just because he’s done so well with a small one (this is the guy who, with pocket change to spend on the free agent market, thought Pat Burrell and the remains of Manny Ramirez would be good ideas, so it’s not just a string of number one hits here). Additionally, there are other unknowns with Friedman, including the ability to handle the pressure of a big market, and especially one like Chicago. Not one of the seven fans who go to Tampa games could pick Friedman out of a lineup even if he was wearing a big sign that said “hey you assholes, I’m Andrew Fucking Friedman” while in Boston, those crazy motherfuckers can pick Theo out of a crowd while wearing a gorilla suit on Halloween. There’s no such thing as “media pressure” in St. Petersburg. Do they even have a fucking newspaper outside of the Del Boca Vista Breeze?

Whereas Theo’s thrived in one of the most stressful sports environments there is, with a lynch mob for a fan base and an ownership group and team president who, to put it mildly, like to meddle. This is not to take anything away from Friedman, an excellent GM who has found quite a bit of success the past few years in spite of his own set of difficult circumstances (and if he ends up being the guy, count me on board), but Theo’s a fucking rock star, the PR home run, the guy you go after first.


Share this Post

Comments

  1. Berselius

    Not just all the number 1 picks, but the 1st round picks, supplemental 1st round and overall number of top 5 round picks heavily favors the Rays. And then the Red Sox are an organization that will trade players away from time to time whereas the Rays absolutely cannot trade prospects.

    FWIW all those first round/supplemental picks come from the fact that the Rays cannot sign their own FAs or other FAs that require compensation.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Berselius

    Del Boca Vista Breeze

    Still (dying laughing) at this. It also helps that the Del Boca Vista Breeze is entirely made up of articles about which restaurants have the best Early Bird specials and bragging about grandchildren.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]FWIW all those first round/supplemental picks come from the fact that the Rays cannot sign their own FAs or other FAs that require compensation.[/quote]Of course. I just kind of assumed that most around here knew that. Look, I’m not trying to say Friedman isn’t good because he obviously is, but Theo has built as productive a farm system as the Rays have and he’s done it without several of the advantages the Rays have had. Trading Hanley Ramirez is something the Rays would never do. They couldn’t and as a result, their own production from the farm system looks better than the Red Sox, but the reality is that there’s little difference and it may even favor the Sox. Anibal Sanchez was in that deal for Beckett too.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. WaLi

    [quote name=Berselius]Still (dying laughing) at this. It also helps that the Del Boca Vista Breeze is entirely made up of articles about which restaurants have the best Early Bird specials and bragging about grandchildren.[/quote]Pinko commie rag.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. mb21

    SL said it better than I could, but right here is perfect:

    This is not to take anything away from Friedman, an excellent GM who has found quite a bit of success the past few years in spite of his own set of difficult circumstances (and if he ends up being the guy, count me on board), but Theo’s a fucking rock star, the PR home run, the guy you go after first.

    If Theo comes to Chicago and doesn’t reach the ultimate goal, everybody can say they hired the best guy available. If they hire Friedman and the same happens everybody is saying that they passed on Theo. You definitely go after Theo first and if he’s available you sign him. He’s as sure thing as it gets. Friedman definitely isn’t.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Berselius

    [quote name=mb21]Of course. I just kind of assumed that most around here knew that. Look, I’m not trying to say Friedman isn’t good because he obviously is, but Theo has built as productive a farm system as the Rays have and he’s done it without several of the advantages the Rays have had. Trading Hanley Ramirez is something the Rays would never do. They couldn’t and as a result, their own production from the farm system looks better than the Red Sox, but the reality is that there’s little difference and it may even favor the Sox. Anibal Sanchez was in that deal for Beckett too.[/quote]
    My bad, just misinterpreted what you were saying.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. mb21

    If you factor in players traded I’ll bet $50 that the Red Sox have produced more WAR from their farm system from 2006 through 2011 than the Rays system has produced. It would be easiest to check rWAR so if someone wants to take that bet, let me know.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Berselius

    [quote name=mb21]If you factor in players traded I’ll bet $50 that the Red Sox have produced more WAR from their farm system from 2006 through 2011 than the Rays system has produced. It would be easiest to check rWAR so if someone wants to take that bet, let me know.[/quote]
    On the other hand, the Rays are sure hoping that guys like Moore, Hellickson, and Jennings sign on with Longoria’s agent (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. GBTS

    I just watched Breaking Bad last night and threw my two cents in on The Kid. Am curious to see what other people think.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]My bad, just misinterpreted what you were saying.[/quote]Don’t let it happen again. (dying laughing)

    I was just trying to be brief and quickly point out the advantages that the Rays have had in building a farm system: higher 1st round picks, more 1S picks, more overall 1st through 5th round picks, not trading prospects and so on.

    I also feel like highlighting the farm systems so much ignores the many other aspects of being a general manager. There is little doubt whatsoever and I don’t think anyone would argue that the Red Sox MLB team has been more successful in Theo’s time there than the Rays have been under Friedman. Theo undoubtedly is better prepared to deal with the media and fans (Chicago actually has some).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. mb21

    Evan Longoria has been, by far, the most productive player produced from the Rays farm system since Friedman has been around. Interestingly, Longoria was drafted in the 1st round by the Red Sox and refused to sign.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. mb21

    [quote name=GBTS]I just watched Breaking Bad last night and threw my two cents in on The Kid. Am curious to see what other people think.[/quote]I responded.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. mb21

    I figure with Theo there is a high certainty that the Cubs will be very good for a long time and may even win a championship (or more). I think there is a good chance the same is true with Friedman, but I don’t see how it can be as high a certainty as with Theo. Theo would be leaving the Red Sox for, well, the Red Sox in the NL Central. Actually, he’d be leaving the Red Sox for the Yankees of the NL Central in terms of payroll.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. GBTS

    [quote name=mb21]Interestingly, Longoria was drafted in the 1st round by the Red Sox and refused to sign.[/quote]When was this? I know he went undrafted out of high school.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. Mercurial Outfielder

    Theo Epstein? Ummmm, I think you’re all confused. Tom Ricketts has actually asked permission to speak with Juan Luis Pedro Phillipo DeHuevos Epstein. In case you don’t believe me, I have a note from Epstein’s mother.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Berselius

    [quote name=Aisle424][/quote]
    I’m more than happy to mock WBC for being morons, but I don’t really see the big joke here. It’s not like they’re calling for a boycott on Apple products.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. mb21

    [quote name=GBTS]?

    Am I missing something? That says Pedroia.[/quote](dying laughing) no, I’m an idiot. I always get those two confused. (dying laughing) wow, I am fucking stupid.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Berselius]I’m more than happy to mock WBC for being morons, but I don’t really see the big joke here. It’s not like they’re calling for a boycott on Apple products.[/quote]I think the irony is that they are using a tool created by a sinner.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21](dying laughing) no, I’m an idiot. I always get those two confused. (dying laughing) wow, I am fucking stupid.[/quote]All you white people look alike.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. GBTS

    [quote name=mb21](dying laughing) no, I’m an idiot. I always get those two confused. (dying laughing) wow, I am fucking stupid.[/quote](dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)

    Well, to be fair, they’re both gritty infielders.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Berselius

    [quote name=Rice Cube]I think the irony is that they are using a tool created by a sinner.[/quote]
    If that’s their criteria, they should all be living in the fucking woods.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. mb21

    [quote name=GBTS](dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)

    Well, to be fair, they’re both gritty infielders.[/quote]I wonder how many other times I’ve confused the two. I know it’s a lot.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]If that’s their criteria, they should all be living in the fucking woods.[/quote]Can it be the woods as fucking far away from Topeka as possible? I suggest they find a heavy patch of vegetation at the bottom of the ocean.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. Mercurial Outfielder

    Damn. Must be a buncha whippersnappers in here when Welcome Back Kotter jokes fall flat.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. GBTS

    [quote name=Berselius]If that’s their criteria, they should all be living in the fucking woods.[/quote]With that Godless Smokey the Bear faget?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. GBTS

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Damn. Must be a buncha people under 35 in here when Welcome Back Kotter jokes fall flat.[/quote].

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. Berselius

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Damn. Must be a buncha whippersnappers in here when Welcome Back Kotter jokes fall flat.[/quote]
    That must have been a show you recently enjoyed.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Berselius]That must have been a show you recently enjoyed.[/quote]Oh, indeed.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]Did we ever figure out how Theo Epstein was worth $300 million in tax money?[/quote]You have to factor in the compound interest from the Silva money.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. Berselius

    [quote name=mb21]Did we ever figure out how Theo Epstein was worth $300 million in tax money?[/quote]
    He has an extra stadium in his back yard.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. Berselius

    Seriously though I don’t know what Chuck was talking about, unless he was simply talking about having a winning team. But that’s only if the difference is between Epstein and Randy Bush, and even then I don’t know that it’s a $300m difference.

    From what I can tell of the Sox FO it’s Lucchino who is their business guy when it came to reviving Fenway (he was also involved in Camden Yards, etc.). Less than zero chance that Lucchino would be coming along with Epstein given their relationship.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. dylanj

    maybe Chuck thinks banks will suddenly go “oh THEO EPSTEIN is the GM!?” Well then heres 300 mill at subprime. Go build Wrigley 2.0.

    Intangibles people.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  33. Rice Cube

    [quote name=dylanj]maybe Chuck thinks banks will suddenly go “oh THEO EPSTEIN is the GM!?” Well then heres 300 mill at subprime. Go build Wrigley 2.0.

    Intangibles people.[/quote]I would (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  34. mb21

    [quote name=dylanj]maybe Chuck thinks banks will suddenly go “oh THEO EPSTEIN is the GM!?” Well then heres 300 mill at subprime. Go build Wrigley 2.0.

    Intangibles people.[/quote](dying laughing) it doesn’t make any sense to me and apparently all people not named Chuck. It’s strange.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  35. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=dylanj]maybe Chuck thinks banks will suddenly go “oh THEO EPSTEIN is the GM!?” Well then heres 300 mill at subprime. Go build Wrigley 2.0.

    Intangibles people.[/quote]That seems to be the sentiment. I still don’t know why Chuck thinks that to be the case, though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  36. WenningtonsGorillaCock

    I mentioned that when “Catching Hell” was premiering that my dad makes a brief appearance in it b/c he had a book coming out. Well, it’s out now on Amazon and Kindle. I posted a FanShot Unobstructed View about it, but don’t know what I’m doing so I’m not sure if it’ll show up or not (dying laughing) Anyway, the link is below if you want to check it out. It basically analyzes the play from a rules perspective. It is their contention that the umpires blew the call and that it should have been ruled fan interference. It’s fairly entertaining and convincing.

    http://www.amazon.com/Mad-Ball-Walter-J-Yurkanin/dp/0983812837/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1317912778&sr=8-1

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  37. Mercurial Outfielder

    Alright, I’m off to teach. Today I get to use George Will’s latest hamfisted William F. Buckley wannabe column to illustrate the perils of poor reasoning.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  38. Berselius

    [quote name=dylanj]maybe Chuck thinks banks will suddenly go “oh THEO EPSTEIN is the GM!?” Well then heres 300 mill at subprime. Go build Wrigley 2.0.

    Intangibles people.[/quote]
    I don’t think Chuck thinks that. He knows that it will take more than $300 mil (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  39. Berselius

    [quote name=Berselius]He has an extra stadium in his back yard.[/quote]
    Also, all of the Chicago politics related bodies are buried there.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  40. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]I don’t think Chuck thinks that. He knows that it will take more than $300 mil (dying laughing)[/quote]Then what the hell is he saying? Is money going to grow on trees in Illinois if Theo is hired?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  41. mb21

    [quote name=WenningtonsGorillaCock]Sweet – thanks[/quote]To find the post you should always be able to click on the Unobstructed Views link on the menu and it should be there. The link on the sidebar here takes a little while to update as it’s using a cache since it doesn’t often change.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  42. Rodrigo Ramirez

    I agree that Theo would be the better choice for the Cubs. But in terms of how he drafted v. Friedman, did you guys look at the amount spent on the draft?

    I’m assuming Theo went overslot much more and the Rays drafted within their means- and almost always identifying the right players.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  43. Berselius

    [quote name=Rodrigo Ramirez]I agree that Theo would be the better choice for the Cubs. But in terms of how he drafted v. Friedman, did you guys look at the amount spent on the draft?

    I’m assuming Theo went overslot much more and the Rays drafted within their means- and almost always identifying the right players.[/quote]
    Not really sure what you’re trying to say here. I’m sure the Rays would have loved to go overslot if they could. It also helps that the Rays generally had higher picks than the Sox. A lot tougher to get value without grabbing tough signs when you’re drafting in the mid 20s every year.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  44. Aisle424

    [quote name=Berselius]Not really sure what you’re trying to say here. I’m sure the Rays would have loved to go overslot if they could. It also helps that the Rays generally had higher picks than the Sox. A lot tougher to get value without grabbing tough signs when you’re drafting in the mid 20s every year.[/quote]I’m not sure we can say that the Red Sox almost certainly spent more money on the draft than the Rays simply because they have more money.

    Without looking it up (because Aramis Ramirez has been a bad influence on me), it is entirely possible (and maybe even probable) that theRays spent more on the draft.

    What is $2.5 million going to get you on the FA market? Aaron Miles if you’re Jim Hendry. $2.5 million gets you Dillon Maples in the draft. A small market team would be foolish not to allocate more of its less plentiful dollars in an area that could net them a higher ceiling of talent than the quick-fix route of paying for what a FA has done for another team.

    Like I said, I don’t know this to be true, but it is very likely in my opinion.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  45. Rodrigo Ramirez

    I guess I was wondering if Friedman has been better via the draft since it’s probable he spent less money- which I do not know to be true. I will try to look it up.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  46. Rodrigo Ramirez

    A sample here:

    From 2008-2010 the Red Sox spent $28,274,800

    The Rays in that same period spent $21,076,300

    I will try to look for more.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  47. WenningtonsGorillaCock

    [quote name=mb21]To find the post you should always be able to click on the Unobstructed Views link on the menu and it should be there. The link on the sidebar here takes a little while to update as it’s using a cache since it doesn’t often change.[/quote]Is there a Post about Posting there? I’m not sure when to capitalize words or how many commas to use per sentence. Should I be posting from a mobile phone?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  48. Berselius

    [quote name=Rodrigo Ramirez]A sample here:

    From 2008-2010 the Red Sox spent $28,274,800

    The Rays in that same period spent $21,076,300

    I will try to look for more.[/quote]
    Per pick would matter too, since the Rays had so many

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  49. GBTS

    [quote name=WenningtonsGorillaCock]Is there a Post about Posting there? I’m not sure when to capitalize words or how many commas to use per sentence. Should I be posting from a mobile phone?[/quote]This question should have been a Fan Shot.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  50. Berselius

    [quote name=WenningtonsGorillaCock]Is there a Post about Posting there? I’m not sure when to capitalize words or how many commas to use per sentence. Should I be posting from a mobile phone?[/quote]
    As dumb as Yellon’s posts about posts are I find Lookout Landing much more annoying about it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  51. GBTS

    [quote name=Berselius]Ah, it got bahleeted. An angry ex-girlfriend got a hold of his account.[/quote]http://i.huffpost.com/gen/369615/DENARD-ROBINSON-TWITTER.jpg

    You WILL reap what you sew!

    (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  52. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mish]I wish I had the corresponding quetsion to this physics problem:

    [/quote]If Batman swoops down in an attempt to knock down the Joker, but Joker moves out of the way, is this Aramis Ramirez’s fault?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  53. Rice Cube

    To be serious it’s probably asking about how far Batman or the Joker will bounce relative to the point of impact assuming Joker didn’t pack an inflatable suit or something to increase elasticity.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  54. Mish

    KG

    Junior Lake, SS, Cubs (Solar Sox): 3-for-4, 2B, HR (1), 2 R, RBI, SB. Still athletic as all get out; still can’t hit a breaking ball, still has plenty of scouts who would like to see him on the mound.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  55. Mish

    [quote name=Rice Cube]To be serious it’s probably asking about how far Batman or the Joker will bounce relative to the point of impact assuming Joker didn’t pack an inflatable suit or something to increase elasticity.[/quote]
    I’m guessing an angular momentum/force in there as well.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  56. GBTS

    Anyone here ever been to the Potowatomi Casino in Milwaukee? I’m going there this weekend, wondering if it’s anything exceptional.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  57. Berselius

    [quote name=Mish]I wish I had the corresponding quetsion to this physics problem:

    [/quote]
    I had a physics teacher in high school who did an entire problem set on this type of stuff based on Batman. The only one I remember was one where batman was jumping off a bridge onto a passing boat.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  58. Rice Cube

    [quote name=GBTS]There’s no way Batman in that suit weighs that little.

    MAYBE Michael Keaton.[/quote]That was obviously Nightwing posing as Batman in the “Prodigal” storyline.

    /jesuschristRCisanerd’d

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  59. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Berselius]I had a physics teacher in high school who did an entire problem set on this type of stuff based on Batman. The only one I remember was one where batman was jumping off a bridge onto a passing boat.[/quote]There was one I recall where they talked about Superman’s X-ray vision and how far away from Earth he could be before he would lose resolution while using that ability.

    The classic has always been the monkey attempting to avoid the hunter’s bullet by jumping out of the tree at the exact moment of firing. That monkey never had a chance.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  60. GBTS

    I remember in high school our physics teacher had us watch the opening scene from Two Towers where Gandalf is falling fighting the dragon and estimate the force of impact when they hit the water.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  61. mb21

    [quote name=Rodrigo Ramirez]I agree that Theo would be the better choice for the Cubs. But in terms of how he drafted v. Friedman, did you guys look at the amount spent on the draft?

    I’m assuming Theo went overslot much more and the Rays drafted within their means- and almost always identifying the right players.[/quote]I think the Rays have been among the biggest spenders in the draft for several years now.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  62. mb21

    [quote name=Aisle424]I’m not sure we can say that the Red Sox almost certainly spent more money on the draft than the Rays simply because they have more money.

    Without looking it up (because Aramis Ramirez has been a bad influence on me), it is entirely possible (and maybe even probable) that theRays spent more on the draft.

    What is $2.5 million going to get you on the FA market? Aaron Miles if you’re Jim Hendry. $2.5 million gets you Dillon Maples in the draft. A small market team would be foolish not to allocate more of its less plentiful dollars in an area that could net them a higher ceiling of talent than the quick-fix route of paying for what a FA has done for another team.

    Like I said, I don’t know this to be true, but it is very likely in my opinion.[/quote]Agreed. I do know the Royals and Pirates have been the biggest spenders in the draft and on amateur talent overall than any other team over the last 2 to 4 years. I think the Rays are right behind them, but Ramirez has also been a bad influence on me.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  63. mb21

    [quote name=Rodrigo Ramirez]A sample here:

    From 2008-2010 the Red Sox spent $28,274,800

    The Rays in that same period spent $21,076,300

    I will try to look for more.[/quote]What’s that on? The Cubs spent over $20 million this year and were only in the top 10.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  64. mb21

    Here are the teams who gave the top 15 bonuses (to one player) this year: PIT, KC, SEA, WAS, ARI, PIT, BAL, ARI, WAS, SD, CLE, SD, WAS, CHC, HOU.

    I think if we look at this closely and include international free agents we’re going to find that small market teams outspend large market teams. This makes sense. Large market teams are the most active on the free agent market while small market teams are not very active. Large market teams wait for good players from small markets to become free agents.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  65. Aisle424

    [quote name=GBTS]Anyone here ever been to the Potowatomi Casino in Milwaukee? I’m going there this weekend, wondering if it’s anything exceptional.[/quote]It’s OK. It’s like a Harrah’s feel with the size of the older Vegas Casinos like Golden Nugget or FitzPatrick’s or Imperial Palace.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  66. Rodrigo Ramirez

    [quote name=mb21]What’s that on? The Cubs spent over $20 million this year and were only in the top 10.[/quote]
    It’s from Baseball Reference.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  67. mb21

    [quote name=Rodrigo Ramirez]It’s from Baseball Reference.[/quote]I know I read an article on Baseball America after the international free agent signing period that had the Cubs over $20 million and I think they were 6th or 7th. The Royals and Pirates were at the top. I’ll look into it some more, but I don’t think the spending has been that much different. Spending on amateur talent is how the Rays have been successful. That, and developing it, which is part luck.

    Even if we give Friedman a slight advantage in developing talent, I still think the other differences overwhelmingly favor Theo. Not enough that you’d give up someone like Castro, but maybe enough that you’d give up Brett Jackson or Trey McNutt. One thing you’re buying with Theo is certainty. He’s been there, done that. Friedman hasn’t.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  68. mb21

    My guess at this point is that the Red Sox are trying to extend Theo’s contract and perhaps add another title to his job. There’s just no reason for this to take as long as it has. It’s been 3 days.

    I’d say that makes it less likely he’s going to the Cubs.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  69. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]My guess at this point is that the Red Sox are trying to extend Theo’s contract and perhaps add another title to his job. There’s just no reason for this to take as long as it has. It’s been 3 days.

    I’d say that makes it less likely he’s going to the Cubs.[/quote]Well that’s a total funsucker.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  70. Rodrigo Ramirez

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Well that’s a total funsucker.[/quote]
    Seriously, how the fuck has this taken 3 days. Seems fairly simple- yes you can speak to him; no you cannot speak to him.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  71. Smokestack Lightning

    [quote name=Rodrigo Ramirez]Seriously, how the fuck has this taken 3 days. Seems fairly simple- yes you can speak to him; no you cannot speak to him.[/quote]
    It would seem so, which leads me to conclude that if they do grant an interview, Epstein is all but assured of becoming the next GM. The Red Sox won’t even let him talk to the Cubs unless they’ve pretty much agreed to part ways. At that point, unless Ricketts shows up to the interview in Harry Caray glasses the entire process becomes a formality imo.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  72. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Smokestack Lightning]It would seem so, which leads me to conclude that if they do grant an interview, Epstein is all but assured of becoming the next GM. The Red Sox won’t even let him talk to the Cubs unless they’ve pretty much agreed to part ways. At that point, unless Ricketts shows up to the interview in Harry Caray glasses the entire process becomes a formality imo.[/quote]This would be the exact opposite of funsucking depending on what the compensation package is, or maybe the Red Sox just say “whatever” out of respect and thanks to Theo and the Cubs just pay the man and give up nothing. Double anti-funsucking!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  73. Smokestack Lightning

    [quote name=Rice Cube]This would be the exact opposite of funsucking depending on what the compensation package is, or maybe the Red Sox just say “whatever” out of respect and thanks to Theo and the Cubs just pay the man and give up nothing. Double anti-funsucking![/quote]
    I dunno. The longer this drags out the smaller the Cubs chances imo.

    The situation has gotten very odd. It’s like Henry and Lucchino are hiding in the treehouse, hoping that if they just stay quiet, the nerdy kids from next door will go away.

    I mean c’mon the fucking Vatican picks a pope quicker than this.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  74. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Berselius]Robin Ventura ———-> CHW manager[/quote]When they play the Rangers, will Nolan Ryan beat the shit out of him just for old times’ sake?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  75. binky

    [quote name=mb21]There’s no urgency, but it’s strange it takes 3 days for the Sox to decide yes or no.[/quote]They gave permission 4 weeks ago, but the media just hasn’t been told yet. The interview actually happend two days ago.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  76. GBTS

    [quote name=Berselius]Robin Ventura ———-> CHW manager[/quote]Good news for Craig Grebeck, he’s apparently the next in line.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  77. Rice Cube

    [quote name=josh]They gave permission 4 weeks ago, but the media just hasn’t been told yet. The interview actually happend two days ago.[/quote]There is a non-zero chance that this is true (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  78. GBTS

    [quote name=Rice Cube]There is a non-zero chance that this is true (dying laughing)[/quote]Theo has been the Cubs GM since 2009.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  79. binky

    [quote name=GBTS]Theo has been the Cubs GM since 2009.[/quote]He would have done better if not for Aramis Ramirez’s influence.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  80. Berselius

    [quote name=josh]I think it was time, if not past time, for it to go.[/quote]I dunno, I think they still have a fee hundred stories left where Homer gets a job with a celebrity guest star

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  81. binky

    [quote name=Berselius]I dunno, I think they still have a fee hundred stories left where Homer gets a job with a celebrity guest star[/quote]Oh they had them, all right. They just turn their random plot assembler on and it spits out 4 story points from previous episodes. Easy.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  82. Mish

    [quote name=josh]I think it was time, if not past time, for it to go in 1999.[/quote]
    .

    (fully aware that there were some cromulent episodes after that but that’s a fine cutoff for me)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  83. GW

    [quote name=Tim Wilken]You can’t force picks. Don’t take a fifth-round pitcher in the second round just because you need pitching. I’ve never believed in doing that.[/quote]
    (dying laughing)…

    I guess a 5th round pitcher in the 1st round is a completely different story.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  84. mb21

    [quote name=GW](dying laughing)…

    I guess a 5th round pitcher in the 1st round is a completely different story.[/quote](dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  85. ACT

    http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=15257#commentMessage

    One thing I find interesting about the pinch-hitter vs. pitcher chart is that pinch-hitters actually fare slightly worse than pitchers with runners on first and second and no out. Pitchers almost always bunt in this situation. Is it possible that pinch hitters aren’t bunting enough here (especially since managers are reluctant to bring in a PH and ask him to lay down a bunt)?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  86. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    are the Yankees doing a damn bullpen game? there is no way they are going to win in the playoffs with 1 starting pitcher

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  87. Rice Cube

    I’m not an expert, but it seems that walking Miguel Cabrera to get to Victor Martinez wasn’t all that good of a strategy.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  88. ACT

    [quote name=Rice Cube]I’m not an expert, but it seems that walking Miguel Cabrera to get to Victor Martinez wasn’t all that good of a strategy.[/quote]I’m not crazy about it. I don’t like most IBB’s, really. But at least there were 2 outs and Miguel is one of the best hitters in the universe.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  89. ACT

    I can’t believe A-Rod gets paid a billion dollars to strike out in key situations. Literally. His contract actually has a clause that says he gets a billion dollars whenever he K’s in a clutch at-bat.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  90. Rice Cube

    [quote name=ACT]I can’t believe A-Rod gets paid a billion dollars to strike out in key situations. Literally. His contract actually has a clause that says he gets a billion dollars whenever he K’s in a clutch at-bat.[/quote](dying laughing) It’s amazing how many people are bashing A-Rod now because he sucked in this series.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  91. mb21

    [quote name=Berselius]Valverde’s money ———–> where his mouth is[/quote]Kind of. Valverde did say the series wouldn’t get back to New York.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  92. mb21

    [quote name=GW]with apologies to mb, glad to see the yanks lose. wouldn’t be upset at all if the cubs end up with cashman.[/quote]I’d be very happy to end up with Cashman though I think he’s the least likely of the candidates. The Cubs job is a pretty good one right now, but Cashman’s is too.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  93. GW

    part of me hopes that Epstein suddenly converts to libertarianism and is selected by Bob Barr as his vice presidential candidate for 2012.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  94. Berselius

    [quote name=mb21]http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/baseball/red_sox/view/2011_1007epstein_resolution_draws_near/srvc=home&position=recent[/quote]
    Henry and Lucchino are supposed to be in-studio on NESN this morning, but the buzz I got from the radio is that they didn’t signal that there was going to be any big news.

    One WEEI caller suggested that if the Red Sox keep taking their time on this, the Cubs should sent Epstein a gorilla suit so he can sneak out for an interview (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  95. Berselius

    [quote name=GW]part of me hopes that Epstein suddenly converts to libertarianism and is selected by Bob Barr as his vice presidential candidate for 2012.[/quote]
    That way, if he becomes the Cubs GM it would mean untold billions in revenues for the city.

    /Chuck

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  96. WaLi

    [quote name=Berselius]Henry and Lucchino are supposed to be in-studio on NESN this morning, but the buzz I got from the radio is that they didn’t signal that there was going to be any big news.

    One WEEI caller suggested that if the Red Sox keep taking their time on this, the Cubs should sent Epstein a gorilla suit so he can sneak out for an interview (dying laughing)[/quote](dying laughing) a Gorilla suit? It’s a trap! Those crazy motherfuckers can pick Theo out in a gorilla suit.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  97. Berselius

    [quote name=WaLi](dying laughing) a Gorilla suit? It’s a trap! Those crazy motherfuckers can pick Theo out in a gorilla suit.[/quote]

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  98. Berselius

    [quote name=Robothal]Following @bradfo tweets on Henry, Lucchino appearance on @WEEI. Sounds like Henry is cushioning #RedSox fans for departure of Theo. #MLB[/quote]
    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  99. mb21

    WEEI: Henry: Is a certain protocol in this game if somebody asks for permission to talk about a job that is not lateral, you grant permission

    That’s about all he said about it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  100. Mish

    For those that watched Parks and Rec last night, I didn’t realize that Dan Castellaneta played the radio host at the beginning, most likely because I had no idea what Dan Castellaneta looked like. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  101. mb21

    Unless some Red Sox reporter breaks a story about Theo interviewing with the Cubs, we’ll never know what the Sox did. We know for god damn sure the Cubs reporters don’t have a fucking clue.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  102. Berselius

    [quote name=mb21]Unless some Red Sox reporter breaks a story about Theo interviewing with the Cubs, we’ll never know what the Sox did. We know for god damn sure the Cubs reporters don’t have a fucking clue.[/quote]
    I don’t know what’s more sad for the newspaper business – that Bruce Miles can’t travel anywhere or that Phil Rogers has been sent by the Trib to as many playoff games as possible without any Chicago teams in the mix.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  103. binky

    [quote name=Mish]For those that watched Parks and Rec last night, I didn’t realize that Dan Castellaneta played the radio host at the beginning, most likely because I had no idea what Dan Castellaneta looked like. (dying laughing)[/quote]Not a true Simpsons fan.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  104. Mucker

    If Theo gets the job, does that change the Cubs tactical plan this offseason? Does it mean the Cubs will be interested in Sabathia, C.J., Fielder, etc.? Maybe some trade acquisitions? Or do the Cubs still continue to try and rebuild the farm system and give Theo a chance to really build a perennial contender?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  105. binky

    [quote name=Mucker]If Theo gets the job, does that change the Cubs tactical plan this offseason? Does it mean the Cubs will be interested in Sabathia, C.J., Fielder, etc.? Maybe some trade acquisitions? Or do the Cubs still continue to try and rebuild the farm system and give Theo a chance to really build a perennial contender?[/quote]I’m hoping for perennial contender at some point. Saddling the team with a bunch of long term contracts that may be really cumbersome in a few years is pretty much what we have now. I’d personally like to see a philosophical shift.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  106. WaLi

    [quote name=Berselius]http://mlb.sbnation.com/2011/10/7/2474722/miami-marlins-ballpark-home-run-structure-what-is-that-gaaaaaaaaah

    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)[/quote]


    Behold. This is what will happen when the Marlins hit a home run. It’s what Bernie Brewer thinks he’s sliding down after a couple buttons of peyote. Don’t avert your eyes. Look at it. Study it. This is what we’ve become.

    If Carnival and Las Vegas had a baby, this would be the placenta. If Charlton Heston ever lands on Planet of the Fish, this will be their version of the “It’s a Small World” ride. This is what would happen if Vikings attacked a Gloria Estefan concert by catapulting flamingos and marlins into the pyrotechnics display.

    (dying laughing) Wow. I want some of what they are smoking when they thought that was a good idea.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  107. work sucks

    Matt (Bloomington, IN) Hey Bruce, which scenario do you think is more likely for the Cubs heading into next season: Ryno as Manager, or Theo as GM?

    Bruce Levine (2:13 PM) I’d say Theo as GM is much more likely and something we should know in the next 2-3 days. The Jewish high holiday starting tomorrow night convilutes things a bit. It would not be kosher to announce your new Jewish GM on the holiest day of the Jewish calendar. Expect something either today or up to sundown Friday. After that it would be Sunday.

    that was yesterday

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  108. work sucks

    I assume the Red Sox granted the request immediately, or as soon as they knew that Theo was interviewing for the role of Team President and GM, which is a promotion. I’d say the interview and job offer has already happened, and Theo is in the process of deciding whether to leave and/or shopping his offer back to Boston to get a promotion/extension.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  109. Mercurial Outfielder

    Remember when I said the Cubs were gonna have to hire someone fluent in local politics to make this public funding thing go? On Sept. 12, they hired Julian Green as VP od Communications. His creds?

    The man has been press secretary to then-U.S. Senator Barack Obama. He was director of communications and marketing for the Chicago Park District. He was assistant press secretary to then-Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley. He is an interim board member of the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority.

    Smart. Fucking. Move. IMO, this moves them closer to that public money that Theo ever will.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  110. WenningtonsGorillaCock

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]On Sept. 12[/quote]The local media is improving. It hasn’t even been a month yet, and they’ve already reported on something. We might actually find out who the new GM is before spring training.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  111. ACT

    [quote name=Suburban kid 22]Smokestack Lightning is also one of the Wolf’s best tunes:

    [/quote]Agreed, but to do youtube tags, I think you just do the letters, not the address:

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  112. binky

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Remember when I said the Cubs were gonna have to hire someone fluent in local politics to make this public funding thing go? On Sept. 12, they hired Julian Green as VP od Communications. His creds?

    Smart. Fucking. Move. IMO, this moves them closer to that public money that Theo ever will.[/quote]Next, they should burn down Wrigley for the insurance money.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  113. The Wreckard

    I would take Crawford even with his salary.
    Guys, hitting is not about muscle. It’s simple physics. Calculate the velocity, v, in relation to the trajectory­, t, in which g, gravity, of course remains a constant…. It’s not complicate­d. – George Costanza
    by troutfishin on Oct 7, 2011 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions

    I’m sure Cubs fans would welcome a struggling, highly-paid African-American ballplayer
    What could possibly go wrong?

    by Wreckard on Oct 7, 2011 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions

    Go play the race card somewhere else
    Guys, hitting is not about muscle. It’s simple physics. Calculate the velocity, v, in relation to the trajectory­, t, in which g, gravity, of course remains a constant…. It’s not complicate­d. – George Costanza
    by troutfishin on Oct 7, 2011 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions

    I’m not genuinely not sure why I keep posting over there.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  114. Mercurial Outfielder

    The temerity of Cubs fans to suggest the mere allegation of prejudice on their part is race-baiting is fucking appalling.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  115. Rice Cube

    [quote name=The Wreckard]I’m not genuinely not sure why I keep posting over there.[/quote]Did this comment string continue? You should have responded with “Prove me wrong.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  116. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=josh]Next, they should burn down Wrigley for the insurance money.[/quote]Let’s See What Happens

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  117. The Wreckard

    Because they love seeing highly paid players get cut down, even when they’re good.

    The amount of vitriol that Cubs fans have for anyone making more than the league minimum is really gross.

    Except Ryan Dempster for some reason. He had an actually disappointing year – but you don’t see anyone openly wishing he’ll opt out and leave.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  118. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=The Wreckard]Because they love seeing highly paid players get cut down, even when they’re good.

    The amount of vitriol that Cubs fans have for anyone making more than the league minimum is really gross.

    Except Ryan Dempster for some reason. He had an actually disappointing year – but you don’t see anyone openly wishing he’ll opt out and leave.[/quote]
    Agreed. It’s very odd. Dempster plays to the camera and does all the fan-friendly BS (including being the first one to out clubhouse “bad guys”) that makes him well-liked. OTOH, Ramirez is quiet, seemingly aloof, and is often on the “wrong” side of clubhouse problems. Maybe that’s why Dempster gets a pass. But I wholeheartedly agree that the hate for any Cubs player getting paid is infuriating. This is made all the more maddening when you consider this is the same band of fucktards that castigated TribCo for YEARS for not spending money.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  119. The Wreckard

    [quote name=Rice Cube]I’ll have to take your word for it as I usually avoid that place like the plague. Otherwise I might have two broken hands and multiple broken monitors.[/quote]It’s gotten so, so much worse lately. Most of the reasonable posters have been driven out by the stupid or banned outright, the level of discourse over there is the lowest it’s ever been.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  120. binky

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Agreed. It’s very odd. Dempster plays to the camera and does all the fan-friendly BS (including being the first one to out clubhouse “bad guys”) that makes him well-liked. OTOH, Ramirez is quiet, seemingly aloof, and is often on the “wrong” side of clubhouse problems. Maybe that’s why Dempster gets a pass. But I wholeheartedly agree that the hate for any Cubs player getting paid is infuriating. This is made all the more maddening when you consider this is the same band of fucktards that castigated TribCo for YEARS for not spending money.[/quote]They didn’t know good players would want so much money. I guess they just thought if TribCo asked people real nice, maybe they’d want to be Cubs. It doesn’t help that Andre Dawson’s blank contract became instant Stuff of Legend. I heard Dawson say he was actually angry because he didn’t think they would screw him over like that, but that he had already promised, so he followed through.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  121. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=josh]They didn’t know good players would want so much money. I guess they just thought if TribCo asked people real nice, maybe they’d want to be Cubs. It doesn’t help that Andre Dawson’s blank contract became instant Stuff of Legend. I heard Dawson say he was actually angry because he didn’t think they would screw him over like that, but that he had already promised, so he followed through.[/quote]Dawson’s blank check stunt was also necessitated by owner collusion, a fact which fans conveniently forget.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  122. Berselius

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]The temerity of Cubs fans to suggest the mere allegation of prejudice on their part is race-baiting is fucking appalling.[/quote]
    racist

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  123. binky

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Dawson’s blank check stunt was also necessitated by owner collusion, a fact which fans conveniently forget.[/quote]That’s why players have to go for the most money they can when they can. If given the chance, there are plenty of owners have no problem playing dirty tricks like that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  124. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=josh]That’s why players have to go for the most money they can when they can. If given the chance, there are plenty of owners have no problem playing dirty tricks like that.[/quote]Right. And we have a commissioner who is way too owner-friendly. Selig’s been in charge of labor operations for MLB since the 70’s. He’s overseen 3 instances of collusion and 5 labor stoppages. For some reason, no one talks about this.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  125. binky

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Right. And we have a commissioner who is way too owner-friendly. Selig’s been in charge of labor operations for MLB since the 70’s. He’s overseen 3 instances of collusion and 5 labor stoppages. For some reason, no one talks about this.[/quote]But he added the wildcard, so all is forgiven. Isn’t the commissioner appointed by the owners? Or do players get some say?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  126. The Wreckard

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Right. And we have a commissioner who is way too owner-friendly. Selig’s been in charge of labor operations for MLB since the 70’s. He’s overseen 3 instances of collusion and 5 labor stoppages. For some reason, no one talks about this.[/quote]Because fans never side with the players for some bizarre reason. They see teams as institutions to be honored, rather than corporate entities owned by super-rich old dudes.

    Just look at the reaction fans had to Ramirez invoking his no-trade rights, rather than accepting a trade to another team at the deadline. Or fans’ reactions to basically any labor stoppage ever (except the NFL one, but that’s because the NFL owners bungled the PR on that so badly).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  127. Berselius

    [quote name=josh]But he added the wildcard, so all is forgiven. Isn’t the commissioner appointed by the owners? Or do players get some say?[/quote]
    The commissioner has always been the mouthpiece of the owners.

    What’s unique about Selig is that he’s much more the CEO than past commisioners (Ueberroth excepted). For the most part the commish dealt with day to day shit the owners didn’t want to deal with. Power is much more centralized with Selig.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  128. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=josh]But he added the wildcard, so all is forgiven. Isn’t the commissioner appointed by the owners? Or do players get some say?[/quote]The owners elect them. Selig got in by actively undermining Fay Vincent (who was perceived by the owners as being too impartial on labor issues, and who was also a colossal asshole), leading the owners to vote no confidence on Vicnent, forcing him out. Selig, due in large part to his role in labor issues over the years, was installed as interim commish in 1992. In 1994, there was a labor stoppage and the WS was canceled. There are many who see these two events as no mere coincidences, including Vincent himself.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  129. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=The Wreckard]Because fans never side with the players for some bizarre reason. They see teams as institutions to be honored, rather than corporate entities owned by super-rich old dudes.

    Just look at the reaction fans had to Ramirez invoking his no-trade rights, rather than accepting a trade to another team at the deadline. Or fans’ reactions to basically any labor stoppage ever (except the NFL one, but that’s because the NFL owners bungled the PR on that so badly).[/quote]
    I’ve never been able to understand that. It’s truly bizarre.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  130. binky

    [quote name=The Wreckard]Because fans never side with the players for some bizarre reason. They see teams as institutions to be honored, rather than corporate entities owned by super-rich old dudes.

    Just look at the reaction fans had to Ramirez invoking his no-trade rights, rather than accepting a trade to another team at the deadline. Or fans’ reactions to basically any labor stoppage ever (except the NFL one, but that’s because the NFL owners bungled the PR on that so badly).[/quote]Yeah, fans should have been up in arms about TribCo screwing Dawson, but instead they feel like they won the lottery. I don’t know if the average fan realizes that if owners didn’t have to pay the Sorianos of baseball $20Mill a year, they’d still charge the same ticket prices, they’d just pocket the rest. I’d rather give my money to the players than to the owners. Somehow this all got turned around. I guess it’s PR. The team gets to market itself as institution, like you said. They control the public image. The players get no say in that, they are employees. The average Joe gets duped again.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  131. Berselius

    [quote name=josh]Yeah, fans should have been up in arms about TribCo screwing Dawson, but instead they feel like they won the lottery. I don’t know if the average fan realizes that if owners didn’t have to pay the Sorianos of baseball $20Mill a year, they’d still charge the same ticket prices, they’d just pocket the rest. I’d rather give my money to the players than to the owners. Somehow this all got turned around. I guess it’s PR. The team gets to market itself as institution, like you said. They control the public image. The players get no say in that, they are employees. The average Joe gets duped again.[/quote]
    I don’t know about that. If the Cubs signed Albert Pujols to a 5/25 deal this offseason I think a lot of fans would be more elated than anything else.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  132. Berselius

    It’s easy to blame the players because salaries did drive costs of going to ballgames up to closer to what the market could bear. People were getting baseball for far less than what it was valued at. Player salaries are just more transparent than corporate profit (and also more fixed).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  133. Mercurial Outfielder

    There’s a great interview with Vincent by Maury at BoB here: http://www.bizofbaseball.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1173&Itemid=81

    Choice bits:

    The owners control the Player Relations Committee. It’s not under the supervision or authority of the Commissioner – never has been. Selig and his committee felt that they had lost confidence in Rona and they wanted to go in a different direction with the outside law firm Chuck O’Connor. Selig made that decision, and I carried it out.

    By the way, you’re very good to ask that question, because that is something that is almost never appreciated in baseball. That is, Selig, for the last 30 years, has been in charge of labor relations in baseball. It never reported to the Commissioner. I thought it should’ve. They brought in, when I was Commissioner, a fellow from New York City, whose name I forget, to be a negotiator and that was really one of the turning points in my involvement in baseball.

    The Union’s been very difficult. I think building a relationship with the Union, #4, would have been a huge priority. The Union basically doesn’t trust the Ownership because collusion was a $280 million theft by Selig and Reinsdorf of that money from the players. I mean, they rigged the signing of free agents. They got caught. They paid $280 million to the players. And I think that’s polluted labor relations in baseball ever since it happened. I think it’s the reason Fehr has no trust in Selig. And I think it’s one of the huge reasons I brought Steve Greenberg to baseball as the deputy. He’s now an investment banker. Everybody in baseball uses him, everybody loves him. But people forget that I brought him to baseball to help deal with Union because he was a former agent, he was well-liked by Fehr, and I think I was absolutely right.

    Indeed, I think that the firing of Steve by Major League Baseball was one of their huge mistakes. They should have kept him on. I think he should be Commissioner. I think he’s by far the most talented businessman in baseball.

    BizBall: Commissioner Selig has said that after his term expires in 2006 that this will be his final term. If that is truly the case, do you expect to see a continuation of a commissioner being promoted from within the ownership ranks, as opposed to an individual that has no vested financial interest in the game?

    Vincent: Well, it’s a tough question. I don’t know how to predict that. Because I think the answer is that it should be an independent. But I think the owners are very happy with Bud. On the other hand, I don’t there’s anybody in baseball… You know Steve Greenberg is the best choice I mean he ought to be the next commissioner. We’ll see what happens.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  134. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Berselius]I don’t know about that. If the Cubs signed Albert Pujols to a 5/25 deal this offseason I think a lot of fans would be more elated than anything else.[/quote]I would be ecstatic.

    I’d also wonder if this was the same Pujols that made a smart play to get Utley going to 3B. Because to accept that little money would reek of stupidity.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  135. binky

    I guess it also probably comes from free agency. Fans really like a player and he leaves for free agency, then that leaves a bad taste in people’s mouth. Eh whatever, there’s greed on both sides.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  136. binky

    [quote name=Rice Cube]I would be ecstatic.

    I’d also wonder if this was the same Pujols that made a smart play to get Utley going to 3B. Because to accept that little money would reek of stupidity.[/quote]Happy if he agreed to it and it was fair, and he gave the Cubs a discount because he wanted to help build a winning team or something. What they did to Dawson wasn’t exactly fair or comparable to that kind of situation. He shouldn’t have trusted them, but they laughed their way to the bank on that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  137. Aisle424

    [quote name=WenningtonsGorillaCock]The local media is improving. It hasn’t even been a month yet, and they’ve already reported on something. We might actually find out who the new GM is before spring training.[/quote]There was a press release on the Cubs website about it. I think someone linked it here back then. No beat reporter commented on it, to my knowledge, other than regurgitating his resume, but it was out there.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  138. Aisle424

    [quote name=The Wreckard]It’s gotten so, so much worse lately. Most of the reasonable posters have been driven out by the stupid or banned outright, the level of discourse over there is the lowest it’s ever been.[/quote]That is truly scary considering where it started.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  139. Mish

    [quote name=Aisle424]That is truly scary considering where it started.[/quote]
    Even if all the banned and exiled reasonable posters returned, you’d still never find a more wretched hive of scum and idiocy.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  140. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Aisle424]There was a press release on the Cubs website about it. I think someone linked it here back then. No beat reporter commented on it, to my knowledge, other than regurgitating his resume, but it was out there.[/quote]It’s an important move, IMO. In terms of getting that money it is as big, if not a bigger move. An insider like Green is what this whole plea for public money has been missing. Kudos to Ricketts for finally figuring out how the wheels turn in Chicago.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  141. Mercurial Outfielder

    I have the right to be wrong. (dying laughing)

    (actual assertion by a student in my class)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  142. Berselius

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]I have the right to be wrong. (dying laughing)

    (actual assertion by a student in my class)[/quote]
    Truly, indeed, these are exponential times.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  143. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Berselius]Truly, indeed, these are exponential times.[/quote]As, since the dawn of time, man has wondered.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  144. Berselius

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]As, since the dawn of time, man has wondered.[/quote]
    It is obvious to the most casual observer.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  145. Berselius

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]I have the right to be wrong. (dying laughing)

    (actual assertion by a student in my class)[/quote]
    Also, you have the right to fail him/her (dying laughing).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  146. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Aisle424]Heyman:[/quote]Some people who have tangentially related positions in the same industry have an unsubstantiated opinion about something.#typicalESPNbullshit

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  147. Rodrigo Ramirez

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Have we gone too far?

    (dying laughing) btw[/quote]
    Yes, I probably did go too far. But with all the talk of fagets, mexicans, and of course Dr. Taint, I just went with it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  148. Berselius

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Some people who have tangentially related positions in the same industry have an unsubstantiated opinion about something.#typicalSIbullshit[/quote]
    Fixed, in this case

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  149. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Rodrigo Ramirez]Yes, I probably did go too far. But with all the talk of fagets, mexicans, and of course Dr. Taint, I just went with it.[/quote]I guess Venom’s vagina was the catalyst.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  150. GW

    [quote name=GW]part of me hopes that Epstein suddenly converts to libertarianism and is selected by Bob Barr as his vice presidential candidate for 2012.[/quote]

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment