Share this Post

Comments

  1. jtsunami

    Geez, I didn’t think this would be possible anymore but Aramis is going to hit 30+ HRs. We should definitely get a high upside spec for him.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Mish

    [quote name=jtsunami]Geez, I didn’t think this would be possible anymore but Aramis is going to hit 30+ HRs. We should definitely get a high upside spec for him.[/quote]
    A .371 wOBA (his triple slash line beats out Pujols) and not a black hole on defense. A good year for Aramis. I like him a lot, I wish he’d approve a trade just so he could go win somewhere.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. jtsunami

    All yesterday:

    Golden snapping out of his mini-slump. 3 XBH in last 2 games.
    I think Hoilman needs to move up so he is forced to slightly change his approach. His patience is fine. But it seems he has Michael Burgess syndrome where, when he does swing, it’s as hard as he can (hence the low number of singles, and high number of XBH and K). It’s working at Boise but I don’t think his numbers will hold up at the higher levels.
    Austin Reed is a weird prospect. He is “projectable”, but so far in his career he is either good or very bad. Last 7 starts: terrible, terrible, good, good, terrible terrible, good. If this is some sort of pattern, I’m guessing his next start is good
    Wang has been lights out. Look for him to get a promotion when Kirk FINALLY gets to Daytona.

    Peralta with a terrible start. 9 ER in 2 IP. Peoria lost 13-0.

    Watkins with a HR for Daytona yesterday.

    Rhoderick with his first terrible outing as a reliever. For some reason he was kept in to face 8 batters, only one of which he got out. Shot his minuscule ERA up to 3.84.
    Vitters 1-3 with a 3-run HR and walk yesterday.
    Clevenger 2-4 with a 2b.
    Ha 2-4 with a 2b.

    Marwin 3-3 with a 2b, HR, and BB.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. ACT

    [quote name=Mish]A .371 wOBA (his triple slash line beats out Pujols) and not a black hole on defense. A good year for Aramis. I like him a lot, I wish he’d approve a trade just so he could go win somewhere.[/quote]Eh, he clearly prefers staying where he is to playing on a contender. Personally, I enjoy watching him play and don’t think he’d get a whole lot in a trade, so I’m fine with his staying here. It’s also not as though we have any excellent third base prospects that he’s blocking.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. melissa

    Mercurial Outfielder 2011-07-22 15:24 Holy fuck, Quade isn’t going to let this Castro-Barney thing go: chicagotribune.com/…/… WTF

    (dying laughing) Looks like I’m not the only one making too big of a deal about the situation.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. GW

    [quote name=GW]http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=14603[/quote]
    I hate quoting myself, but I offered no comment at first, and this is the best baseball article I’ve read in a long time.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. mb21

    [quote name=GW]I hate quoting myself, but I offered no comment at first, and this is the best baseball article I’ve read in a long time.[/quote]I haven’t finished it yet, but liked what I read earlier.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. mb21

    When did Swartz leave Baseball Prospectus? He hadn’t been there that long, had he? Wasn’t he one of the people who started the MVN Stat Speak blog?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. GW

    [quote name=mb21]When did Swartz leave Baseball Prospectus? He hadn’t been there that long, had he? Wasn’t he one of the people who started the MVN Stat Speak blog?[/quote]
    Just recently. siERA was his first article at fangraphs. I think he was at statspeak for a while, but he was second or third generation, after pizza cutter and colin and I can’t remember who else.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. GW

    [quote name=mb21]I haven’t finished it yet, but liked what I read earlier.[/quote]
    I have always been sympathetic with colin’s anti-xFIP stance (and to a lesser extent, his larger point about batted ball data), but that article is the first I’ve read that really lays it out and hammers it home.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Rice Cube

    [quote name=dylanj]16 k’s in 38 ab’s[/quote]
    Wonder if he has a mechanical flaw or something. It’s not like he’s facing much better pitching, right?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. mb21

    [quote name=GW]I have always been sympathetic with colin’s anti-xFIP stance (and to a lesser extent, his larger point about batted ball data), but that article is the first I’ve read that really lays it out and hammers it home.[/quote]He’s written an awful lot about it on The Book Blog. I always love those threads.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Chris Dickerson

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Wonder if he has a mechanical flaw or something. It’s not like he’s facing much better pitching, right?[/quote]
    He’s seen 17 pitches so far.

    4 swinging strikes
    1 called strike
    4 fouls (2 foul bunts – he was trying to sac bunt)
    8 balls

    3 of his 4 swinging strikes have been strike 3. He’s had 2 full counts and one 2-2 count.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. GW

    [quote name=mb21]He’s written an awful lot about it on The Book Blog. I always love those threads.[/quote]
    yeah, me too. the point about the spreads in the data is the one I’ve never seen him present like that before.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment