Series Preview: Detroit Tigers (28-32) at Chicago Cubs (20-40)

In Series Previews by berselius109 Comments

The Tigers were the easy favorite to dominate the mediocre AL Central. They added Prince Fielder to a team that won the division by fifteen games in 2011, forming a core of starts that also includes Miguel Cabrera, Victor Martinez, and Justin Verlander. Fielder has mashed since coming to the team, but not surprisingly the overall lineup has regressed (most notably Alex Avila and Jhonny Peralta), though the offense is still in the upper third of the American League. Their pitching is even better than last year's (2nd in the AL), so what's the difference? The big concern when the Tigers signed Fielder was that it would move Miguel Cabrera over to 3b, and the Tigers went from an average defensive team to one of the worst in baseball, according to UZR (note: not so much with DRS, which agrees that the Tigers D is not good but has the Rockies at a whopping -52 runs below average. Hooray defensive metrics!).

The White Sox (33-27) and Indigenous Peoples (32-27) aren't exactly blowing the doors off the barn themselves. Detroit has dug a bit of a hole for itself (5 games back!!1!) and now only has a ~25% chance of making the playoffs according to BPro. They're still the best team in the division but the margin doesn't look nearly as close as everyone thought three months ago.

Team Overviews

Respective league rankings in parens

  Tigers Cubs
wOBA .324 (5th) .300 (14th)
BSR -2.6 (13th) 3.4 (3rd)
UZR -24.2 (14th) 3.8 (7th)
DRS -18 (13th) 0 (5th)
SIP FIP 3.97 (2nd) 4.06 (11th)
RP FIP 3.63 (7th) 4.68 (16th)

Pitching matchups

ERA, FIP, xFIP, and ZiPS FIP in parens

Tuesday: Max Scherzer, RHP (5.88, 4.44, 3.42, 4.01) vs Paul Maholm, LHP, (5.10, 5.10, 4.53, 4.21) 7:05 PM CT

Max Scherzer doing Max Scherzer things this year, and then some. He has a 11.19 K/9 and has given up 1.82 HR/9. He's a flyball pitcher so you expect more HRs but he's had problems keeping it in the yard anyway (11.7% career HR/FB). When he broke out with the DBacks in 08-09 the big question was durability. He came to the Tigers in the three team trade that sent Curtis Granderson to the Yankees, and I remember hearing that the DBacks wanted to sell high on him because they didn't think he could stick as a starter. Scherzer proved them wrong by throwing 31 and 33 starts in his first two years with the Tigers. He is a guy who can rack up big pitch counts early in games, hence his 195 IP total in those 33 starts, but he's been a pretty good pickup for Detroit. Pretty much everyone got something good out of the deal – Granderson has been nails with the Yankees, Austin Jackson has broken out with the Tigers, Ian Kennedy went from Yankees castoff to frontline starter, and even perenially overachieving Edwin Jackson threw a no-hitter for the Dbacks before participating in the theft of Daniel Hudson from the White Sox. It's the rare win-win-win trade. If anything Scherzer was the main disappointment, "only" posting 7.2 WAR in the two and a half seasons since.

So much for Paul Maholm's regression to the mean. He's had five crappy starts since his four-start run of worm killing baseball. In that stretch he's only given up less than four runs once, in a two run, five walk outing in five innings against his former team's anemic offense. I'll take the over on four runs tonight.

Wednesday: Rick Porcello, RHP (5.03, 4.40, 4.17, 4.24) vs Matt Garza, RHP (3.99, 4.07, 3.53, 3.67), 7:05 PM CT

I'm sensing a bit of a theme here among Tigers pitchers not named Justin with regards to ERA-FIP splits. Porcello is a ground ball machine playing in front of one of the worst infield defenses in baseball. He's a ground ball guy so more balls are going to get through, but a 1.54 WHIP with a 2.38 BB/9 has a lot to do with who is chasing after those balls in play.

Garza put together a pair of good starts to wash away his awful 5 HR stretch against the Pirates and Astros. Unlike Porcello teams aren't getting many hits off of him despite posting a career best GB%. The Cubs defense isn't as good as that .249 BABIP would indicate, however.

Thursday: Justin Verlander, RHP (2.69, 2.65, 3.29, 2.91) vs Travis Wood, LHP (4.71, 6.22, 4.24, 4.21), 1:20 PM CT

The Cubs players might as well have their cars warmed up in the parking lot before this game even starts. Verlander leads all pitchers in MLB by WAR. Four pitchers (Greine, Sale, Gonzalez, Strasburg) have lower FIPs than Verlander, but he's thrown 20 more innings than all of them. Verlander threw 270 innings last year (including the playoffs) and is showing no signs of slowing down. Hoss Radbourn would still call him a nancy boy.

Wood is walking a ton of guys and giving up a lot of HR. I'm not as worried about the HR, since there's plenty of small sample size there (4 HR on a day where the wind is howling out is somewhat forgivable. Somewhat). But he's walking guys all over the place. And it's not like he had one or two bad outings for walks either, he's consistently walked two or three batters in all of his relatively short starts.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. GBTS

    Actually, I know exactly why you hold on to it. Because when you need to fire Sandusky and make him a scapegoat, should any of this have gotten out before he retired, that file is a helluva way to insulate yourself from a wrongful termination suit,

    ….and initiate a federal prosecution against yourself?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. GBTS

    “Don’t even think of squealing to the feds that we knew all along, Jerry. I’ve got a ton more of willfully concealed evidence I was legally obligated to disclose years ago.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. ACT

    Also, I never thought the Phils (aging as they are) to be in last place this late, let alone 8.5 games behind the Nats.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. dylanj

    Free State Brewery in Lawrence KS is making some really awesome beers. They just came out with a bock that is out of this world

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. mb21

    I expected the Tigers to run away with the division. I also expected the Rangers to so that’s a little surprising too. The fact the Tigers aren’t even in 1st place is very surprising.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. dylanj

    MD- do you think the Cubs could ask for Mike Olt in return for Dempster from Tex? With 3 starters on the DL they are hurting.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. Mercurial Outfielder

    FYI, tonight’s game is the mlb.tv free game. I’ll be having dinner with my lovely wife, but you all enjoy that while I enjoy rillettes and pork belly and pinot noir.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. dylanj

    Mercurial Outfielder wrote:

    FYI, tonight’s game is the mlb.tv free game. I’ll be having dinner with my lovely wife, but you all enjoy that while I enjoy rillettes and pork belly and pinot noir.

    yeah well i’ll be getting trashed in my basement eating leftovers. So I win.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ dylanj:
    I think their beers have really nice, well-executed flavor profiles, but the body isn’t really there.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. mb21

    @ dylanj:
    Sure. Ask for a lot and settle lower. May as well start high. I don’t see how they could get him. The guy would be the Cubs 2nd or 3rd best prospect if they got him, but I highly doubt it. Maybe Dempster and Vitters.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. mb21

    Add a few years inflation onto $23.4 million and that’s how much Olt is worth. If you assume he’d be ranked higher at this point in the season then you’re probably talking $35 million surplus trade value for Olt alone. Dempster and Vitters may not be enough either.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. SVB

    As a public service announcement for MB, I’ll summarize the comments on the last thread.

    Really, MB is excited about Rizzo. Really. As is yes, really, he is excited about Rizzo.

    Just not really excited.

    (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. dylanj

    the only downside to Olt is age and the strikeouts. but thats where I would start. I tend to think the national writers are correct in saying the extra wildcard will only increase demand and Dempster is pitching very well.

    I still think the Dodgers overpay for him though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. mb21

    Scouting Report: Olt offers the increasingly rare combination of plus righthanded power and plus defense at third base. Sturdy and physically mature, he has great bat speed and impressive raw thunder. He projects as an average hitter, as he occasionally gets out front and struggles with quality offspeed stuff. Despite his selective approach, he strikes out often. Initially a shortstop in college at Connecticut, Olt plays the hot corner with fluid actions, soft hands and plus arm strength. While he’s a below-average runner, he has good first-step quickness and average range.

    The Future: With Adrian Beltre signed through at least 2015, Olt likely won’t break in with Texas at third base. He has the athleticism to play left field, and he could be used as a blue-chip trade commodity. He’ll spend 2012 at Frisco.

    I just don’t see the Rangers dealing him. Definitely not for a rental. 3B is taken right now, but why not wait a year and a half and decide then? Olt would probably be better than Beltre at that point.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. dylanj

    keep in mind teams probably dont valuate guys with the fangraphs WAR estimator. But yeah, Olt might be too much. I still think a B level prospect is reasonable.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. mb21

    @ Berselius:
    I don’t either. I’m going to post Dempster’s trade value tomorrow, but off the top of my head I’m thinking it’s about $0. If you want to buy in heavily that he’s a much improved pitcher (mistake IMO) then maybe you can up that to $5 million at the most. Vitters might have more value, but if he was nearly as valuable as Olt why make the trade?

    Dempster and Jackson. That’s probably more realistic. It gives the Rangers a CF should Hamilton leave and a short-term pitcher who is still above average. If he pitches well the rest of the season the Rangers could offer arbitration with little risk of him accepting it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. mb21

    @ dylanj:
    No, but they don’t just throw names around either, dj. There is a method. What it is I don’t know, but they’re placing a value on each of the players in the trade and half a season for Dempster for one of the top hitting prospects in the game just isn’t a fair deal in any world. You’d need a desperate team and a dumb GM and even if that were true I still don’t think a deal is done.

    I think Dempster might bring a solid relief prospect in return, but not much more than that. He’s not going to bring an every day player and certainly not a potential all-star with tremendous plate discipline, power and plus defense.

    I do think Dempster plus Jackson could be enough if the team is desperate. Maybe Dempster, Jackson and someone else, but then you’re getting to the point of why bother trading a couple prospects to get one in return?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. mb21

    @ Berselius:
    Yeah. Even if the paid the $4 million or so remaining at the deadline it’s just not a feasible deal. But why not ask? They may think you’re joking, but go ahead and ask for it.

    My guess is Olt is untouchable except for the right deal and the right deal being an impact player with more than a few months remaining on his contract.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Mercurial Outfielder

    LaHair was in no-man’s land there, Johnny Cakes, and a good throw from Cabrera would have had him, you mustachioed dolt.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    The Tigers have a lot of crappy regulars mixed in there with a few stars

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. SVB

    Are you guys watching this on MLB.com? I’m watching from North Carolina, and every ad is an attack ad on the GOP candidate for gov. I guess they can target based on IP address? Or are you learning about Pat McCrory’s questionable ethics too.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Rice Cube

    @ SVB:
    Haven’t actually seen any political ads, saw a couple DirecTV ads though. I’m just amazed that they didn’t black out the feed since I’m actually in Chicago.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. SVB

    Campana ties the ML lead for SBs, but I saw a list in the paper or online somewhere and he wasn’t listed in the SB leaders–apparently because he doesn’t have enough PA to qualify? That doesn’t make sense to me.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. SVB

    John Popper says, “We’ll keep blowing and sucking as long as they’ll let us.” Ha ha. So will the Cubs, but Brenly didn’t bite on that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. Rice Cube

    @ SVB:
    He doesn’t have a lot of plate appearances I guess (only 131 including tonight) but every other time he’s on base he can get a bag or two. I wish he’d try to steal home just for the lulz.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. josh

    @ Berselius:
    Zonk said he was playing when they fired Don Zimmer, and the GM gathered them and yelled at them and told them it was their fault for playing like shit, and they got Don Zimmer fired. It made me think maybe there’s a clubhouse dynamic sort of thing going on. It seems transparent to me from the outside, but I’m not the one being yelled at.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. Suburban kid

    @ SVB:
    Yes, it’s in my portfolio but none of the agencies I’m interviewing with now seem too impressed. But it was the Saturday Evening Post I tell them!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment