Becoming more optimistic about Josh Vitters (Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster, Ryan Dempster)

Josh Vitters entered the 2007 Draft as one of the best bats in the class. Matt Wieters was considered the best college bat in the country and scouts debated whether Mike Moustakas or Josh Vitters was the best high school bat. Some scouts even said Vitters had the best bat in the draft. David Price would be selected 1st and Mike Moustakas next. Then the Cubs picked and took Josh Vitters. Wieters fell to 5th because of contract demands. The Cubs would sign Vitters for $3.2 million. 

Moustakas made his big league debut last year and Vitters is waiting for a call-up. At the time of the draft, Vitters was very nearly a full year younger than Moustakas. Vitters was very young for the draft (just 17). Both of the two played only a minimal amount in 2007, but Moustakas hit well in 47 PA while Vitters struggled in 55 PA. Moustakas entered 2008 as the 18th best prospect in baseball while Vitters was 43rd. 

At the time of the draft, Baseball America offered this scouting report for Vitters:

Vitters' older brother Christian was a solid prospect who had an excellent career at Fresno State. While Christian was a 10th-round pick, Josh figures to go nine rounds higher. He entered last summer as one of the top hitters in the class, then blew to the top of the heap while dominating at the Area Code Games, doubling three times at the Aflac Classic and earning MVP honors at the Cape Cod Classic. While Vitters has solid defensive and running tools, that's not what earned him such accolades–his bat did. He has tremendous feel for getting the fat part of the bat to the ball, and with his tremendous bat speed and barrel awareness, he drives the ball more consistently than any hitter in the class. Scouts describe him as the rare righthanded hitter with a pretty swing, and he's shown the ability to handle different velocities and different styles of pitching with ease. Vitters' his hand-eye coordination and ability to make contact are almost too good, because at times he swings at pitches he should let pass, rather than waiting for one he can punish with his all-fields power. While his hands and footwork at third are sound, he tends to misread hops, and defense doesn't come easy to him. His bat should play at any position, however. His only speed-bump this spring was a bout with pneumonia that caused him to miss two weeks, but he was still considered a near-lock to be picked in the first five spots overall.

Still young in 2008, just 18, Vitters stayed behind at extended spring training and waited for the short season leagues to open. He began that season in Boise and in 277 PA he hit .328/.365/.498. He was bumped to full season Peoria for the final 4 games of the season. Vitters career had taken off. His defense was a concern, which we expected. His patience was also a concern. His NIBB%* was just 5.2%. 

*NIBB% excludes intentional walks from both the numerator and denominator, but includes hit by pitch. It's actually (NIBB+HBP)%, but NIBB% is easier.

A 5.2% rate in short-season A ball isn't all that impressive. The numbers will likely get worse as he plays in more difficult leagues. That's just how it works. The concern the scouts had that he swings at too many pitches was becoming much more of a concern. Still young though, there was no time to panic. 

In part because of the low walk rate, Vitters dropped from the 43rd ranked prospect down to 51st the following year. Vitters was still only 19 and he would begin his first season in a full season league. He returned to Peoria where he had played only 4 games the year before and hit .316/.351/.535, which was good for a .402 wOBA and 148 wRC+. After 70 games and 288 plate appearances he was moved up to High A Daytona and he struggled a bit. He hit just .238/.260/..344 (.277 wOBA, 71 wRC+).

2009 was a mixed bag for Vitters. He crushed the ball in Peoria and was still young for the level, but was eaten up in High A. What became even more of a concern was his inability to draw walks. His NIBB% in Peoria was somewhat decent (6%), but it included 9 HBP. His actual walk percentage was under 3%. On the year his NIBB% was 4.8%. As expected, the numbers were going down and he was only in High A. 

As far as hitting though, Vitters was doing pretty damn well. 

He had a .372 wOBA, 133 wRC+ the following partial season back at High A (120 PA). He was promoted to AA Tennesse and like the year before after a promotion, he struggled. Despite the struggles in AA, he improves his NIBB% to 9.2% in 2010. 

He spent all of 2011 in AA and hit just .283/.322/..448, which was good for a league average wOBA of .334 (99 wRC+). His NIBB% slumped to 6.5%. 

While that's not a fantastic rate, it has been an improvement on what he did early in his career, but despite that the hitting kind of went south for him. Now you had concerns about his ability to stay at 3rd base, his ability to hit well enough and his rather poor plate discipline. 

Vitters was unranked by Baseball America entering 2011 and 2012. He went to Iowa this year where he's been hitting pretty well. At just the age of 22 he's hit .303/.353/.511. His wOBA is .369 (116 wRC+). He's also hit 15 home run, which tied his career high at any one level (2009 Peoria), but he did hit 18 overall in 2009. 

Vitters doesn't have much speed. He had only 8 triples in his career that has spanned 6 seasons and nearly 2100 plate appearances. He has 20 stolen bases and has managed to be caught 18 times. If you know nothing about a player's defense, which as fans we really don't, speed is a good proxy for defensive talent. Vitters has never been known as a good fielder and it's been questionable if he can stick at 3rd base. 

At the MLB level, only Pedro Alvarez, Chris Johnson and Brett Lawrie have made more than 9 errors at 3rd base. Vitters, in the same number of games, has made 19 for AAA Iowa. The average number of assists for those 3 is 169. Vitters has 148. Pedro Alvarez and Chris Johnson each have a .937 fielding percentage, which is the worst among all qualified 3B. Alex Rodriguez and Hanley Ramirez are 3rd worst at .951. Vitters' fielding percentage is .913 and just .924 in his career. The only years Vitters has played in 100 games or more has ben in 2009 (104) and 2011 (100). He made 21 errors each of those seasons. 

I'll be the first to admit that it's very difficult to compare defense in the minors to the big leagues, but that's really all the information I have so it's the best I can do. Considering we know he's a below average 3rd baseman, those numbers just illustrate that fact. By no means do I think he's going to be the worst fielder. I just don't know. It's definitely a possibility. 

He's not a good fielder and he is definitely slow. He's terrible at stealing bases and based on the few number of triples he's had it might be safe to say that he's not going to excel at taking extra bases on hits. He could end up being a good baserunner, but I'd say the odds of that are pretty slim. Instead, it's likely he's a below average baserunner. 

But he can hit. He's always been able to hit and he's doing it at the highest level in the minor leagues. I entered this season thinking Vitters had little chance to become much of anything at the big league level, but he's hit well enough, shown enough ability to get on base without getting a hit that I'm definitely more optimistic than I was. Do think he'll be a superstar? No. There are way too many flaws in his game for that to happen. He doesn't hit for enough power, he doesn't play good enough defense, run the bases well enough and he's not going to be getting on base without a hit enough for that to happen.

He doesn't have to become a superstar to become valuable and I think that's where I am now. Whether he ends up being a platoon partner or a decent everyday 3rd baseman remains to be seen, but there's value in both. There's obviously more value in being an everyday player, but Vitters has crushed lefties in his career. This season he's hiting .331/.381/.621 vs lefties in over 125 PA. He's hit lefties well prior to this season too. 

The Cubs have nobody at 3rd base so I'm anxious to see Josh Vitters get called up and be given a chance to play everyday. I'm more optimistic now than I was a year ago that he might actually be able to hold the position down, but I don't think Vitters will be making any all-star teams. If Vitters has to move to the outfield or across the infield, which is definitely a possibility, the likelihood of him becoming productive drops considerably. 

Mike Quade, You Are A Dumbass

It’s the bottom of the 8th inning on Saturday night and I had sat in Kaufmann Stadium and watched the Cubs and Royals play a very good game. It was well pitched. The umpires, at least from my perspective, made all the right calls. There were some nice plays on defense made by each team. Both teams put runners on, but the opposing pitcher was better than the hitters when it mattered.

To be quite honest, I was quite surprised to see these two teams play a game that actually resembled a Major League game. Prior to the game the Royals held a .5 game advantage on the Cubs for the 2nd pick of next year’s draft. Only the Astros have been worse than either of these teams. If we saw what would typically be a minor league game, it would not be the least bit surprising. It was, in fact, exactly what I expected to see this series. Just two very good minor league teams squaring off at the Major League level in a battle for the second worst record in baseball.

So it was refreshing to see a well played game, especially after last night’s debacle. Both teams lived up to their minor league hype on Friday as each team tried to best the other. In the end it was the Royals who proved to be more inept than the Cubs on Friday. But on Saturday, that was good baseball. That was good Major League Baseball.

Prior to the bottom of the 8th, my only complaint to that point was that I thought whoever the hell that AAA pitching coach is for the Cubs should have visited Carlos Zambrano in the 5th inning after he went 1-0 following the walk. A real pitching coach, say Larry Rothschild, would have ran out to the mound to give Z a breather and give him a moment to settle down. Perhaps it makes no difference. It probably doesn’t so it’s only a minor complaint. Can’t blame Zambrano’s ineffectiveness that inning on the pitching coach. That’s Z’s fault. Would have been nice to see a real pitching coach in the Cubs dugout who could have ran to the mound to talk about what they’re going to have for breakfast tomorrow morning. I don’t know. Not likely it made a bit of difference in the end, but it’s something Major League pitching coaches do.

Then came the bottom of the 8th. I was quite pleased with how Zambrano had battled all night. He didn’t have his best stuff, allowed some baserunners, but made pitches when he needed to. After allowing two runs the Cubs came right back with back to back home runs and Z goes out there in the 6th and 7th and has his best innings. Shut down innings.

I look into the bullpen and see a lefty throwing knowing Z’s night is done. Sweet. Good start for Big Z and now they turn it over to the back-end of the bullpen. It’s gotta be Sean Marshall. Tie game, bottom of the 8th, he’s your setup man, it’s obvious. That lefty in the bullpen is Sean Marshall. I didn’t even bother to take a second look because it had to be Sean Marshall. The possibility of another lefty being up never even entered my mind. I’m not joking. I’ve been watching this team since the early 80s and I can honestly say that I took a look into the bullpen, saw the lefty, looked away knowing for certain it was Sean Marshall. Had to be. It fucking had to be, because any other lefty up in the pen would have been flat out fucking retarded. Sean Marshall was up in the bullpen. Or so I thought.

Turns out the lefty is John Grabow. That’s bad enough, but it gets worse. Grabow easily gets Alex Gordon out. Nothing is easy for John Grabow, but trust me, getting Alex Gordon out on this night was easy for him. The Royals naturally pinch hit for Mitch Maier with Jeff Francouer. Speaking of this, is the first time in history that a player whose name had three consecutive vowels in a row was pinch hit for with a guy whose name also had three consecutive vowels? Probalby not, but those names always piss me off. I can never remember how to spell them.

Anyway, Francouer up and Mike Moustakas on deck. For those not paying attention, that’s a right-hander at bat and a left-hander on deck. There’s one out so you’re looking at the next two batters. One righty, one lefty. What do you do?

Well, you have a couple choices. First, you bring out a righty and have a lefty ready in the pen to face Mike Moustakas. Why? Because it doesn’t fucking matter if you have you have a lefty or right on the mound when Francouer comes up. Whoever is facing the next two batters is going to face one righty and one lefty. That’s right. There is no way around it. One righty (Francouer) and one lefty (Moustakas). It’s science.

If you bring in the righty, you have the platoon advantage vs. Francouer but the disadvantage vs. Moustakas. If you leave the lefty in you have the disadvantage vs Francouer and the advantage vs. Moustakas. If you don’t have a calculator or spreadsheet handy, that’s one platoon advantage and one platoon disadvantage. No. Matter. What.

The second option is to go with with the guy in the game or bring in the righty (Jeff Samardzija since he was up in the pen). As bad at baseball as John Grabow is, does anybody honestly believe that Jeff Samardzija is anywhere as close to as good as Grabow? Forget that shit though. Where the hell was Sean Marshall?

You got lucky with Gordon vs Grabow. If you want to do the lefty/righty/left thing, I’m OK with that even though I think it’s not necessary. But no matter what, if you take the lefty out you have another lefty up to replace the righty when Moustakas comes to bat. Under no circumstances do you ever take out any relief pitcher on the planet who is scheduled for one platoon advantage and disadvantage for Jeff Samardzija who is also going to have the same advantage/disadvantage as the lefty. 

A well played game by both teams quickly became a game that was difficult to even watch. I don’t mind if players make mistakes. I don’t even mind if the manager occasionally makes a mistake, but this one is unaceptable. These decisions were some of the worst I’ve seen Quade make. The guy couldn’t even figure out that it didn’t matter if you brought a righty in that you were still going to face one righty and one lefty. That’s ridiculous.

I skimmed through the comments last night and I disagree about the Reed Johnson play at the plate. Gordon picked the ball up when Johnson had just rounded third. I send the runner every time in that situation unless it’s someone like Ramirez or Soto. Gordon has a strong arm, the throw wasn’t perfect, but he got to the catcher in time to make the play. It happens. I don’t want station to station baseball.

Off the top of my head last night I figured the WE for the Royals without sending the runners was probably 42 to 43 percent or so and after the out about 55%. Thereabouts. Too lazy to look it up. If I’m wrong, tell me. So that play cost the Cubs a -.125 chance of winning. Pretty big play, but not a huge one by any stretch of the imagination. If Reed scores it’s probably a WE of 36%. So he gained .065 if he scored and lost .125 if he didn’t. He have to be safe on that play two out of ever three times to make it worth it. You may disagree that he wasn’t going to be safe on that one, but in order to gain bases you absolutely must accept that you will occasionally make outs on the bases. That’s just how it works. I don’t know for sure if he’s safe two out of three times, but I’m sending him. I’m sending every runner who has rounded 3rd at the time he picks the ball up.

I hate outs on the bases as much as the next guy, but you’ve got two options: play station to station baseball or accept that sometimes you’re going to run into outs on the bases. I don’t know about you guys, but if I was a manager and I played a team that played station to station, I’m position my outfielders as deep as possible. I’m going to take away every extra base hit but the home run of course. In order to bring those outfielders in, you have to make some outs on the bases.

If you’re not making outs on the bases on those plays, the outfielders are playing too deep. That’s never going to happen because they will come in as far as they need to cut you down right at the breakeven point. The same is true with infield defense on a bunt. You play your 3rd baseman in as far as possible so that if the batter bunts you can get him out at the breakeven point. That way the batter doesn’t have an advantage when he bunts. On the other hand, you give him some advantage on swinging away. There’s a tradeoff and it’s not just on bunts, but running the bases too.

Continue reading “Mike Quade, You Are A Dumbass”