Starlin Castro’s Lineup Spot

In Commentary And Analysis by dmick8935 Comments

Contest reminder: Don't forget to enter our contest to win The Essential Games of the Chicago Cubs DVD set. It runs through Sunday.

This has nothing to do with talent, as Castro has as much of it as anyone in baseball. This comes down too mind frame and plate approach. In my mind, Starlin Castro is as good a 2 hitter around. He’s going to make solid contact, can drive a ball into the gaps, will hit a few homers, and is the perfect hit and run candidate because he doesn’t strike out much. There’s a mindframe and specific approach for a 2 hitter and it’s just that. When you move from that spot to 5, you’re now a run producer. Your swing is going to be longer, bigger, and more powerful, making you prone to strike outs, pop outs, and weak ground balls. It also can make you prone to opening up the strike zone more. Obviously, you have to be a certain kind of hitter to hit 3-4-5 in the big leagues, but can you honestly say Starlin Castro is a 5 hitter? I can’t. — Random article I saw on the Yardbarket widget

Ignoring the fact that hitters don't change their approach with different lineup spots, is Starlin Castro really a good number 2 hitter? It obviously depends on the team's offensive players, but is Castro "as good a 2 hitter around"? What is a 2 hitter? To this guy it's some old school shit that Dusty Baker would be proud of.

Let's consult The Book.

Leadoff: OBP is the most important part of leading off and they bat more than anyone else on the team.. They come to plate with runners on base less frequently (by a wide margin) than any other lineup spot. As a result, home runs tend to be wasted in this spot. Speed isn't as important in this spot as many think. Speed is most valuable in front of batters who hit a lot of singles. Stealing 2nd in front of a singles hitter can result in a run. Stealing 2nd in front of a power hitter doesn't really help as much. A runner on 1st in front of a power hitter is in scoring position. The leadoff hitter is also among the top 3 hitters.

Starlin Castro doesn't have great power, but he does have some. He has a .302 OBP this season and a projected .327 OBP the rest of the way. Since OBP is king in this spot, we can safely eliminate Castro from leading off.

Keep in mind that I'm talking about an average team, which the 2012 Cubs are not. We'll look at Castro's lineup spot with regards to his current team later on, but for now we're talking about an average lineup.

2nd hitter: The number 2 hitter should be better than the number 3 hitter because he comes to bat in situations as important as the number 3 hitter and as a result of batting 2nd he has more plate appearances. Because he'll bat with the bases empty frequently, OBP is still very important in this spot.

Since OBP is so important in this spot it also doesn't feel like it's the right one for Castro.

3rd hitter: Teams typically put their best hitter in the 3rd spot even though he has more plate appearances with fewer runners on base than either of the two spots after him. This guy bats with 2 outs and nobody on base often enough that the number 3 hitter is overrated. You fill this spot in the lineup after you fill the other spots in the top 5 are taken.

4th hitter: The cleanup hitter bats in the most important situations in the lineup. Since the number 2 hitters has more plate appearances the overall importance of the two spots is equal. OBP was more important in the 2nd spot since he bats more frequently and power is more important in the 4 spot since there are more runners on base.

This is not Castro.

5th hitter: The number 5 hitter isn't as important as the 1, 2 and 4 spots in the lineup, but is more important than the number 3 spot. He bats with runners on base more often and can provide more value becasue of it.

If we're using The Book to set up our optimized lineup, this is the 4th spot we fill and then we come back to the 3rd spot. Because the 5 hitter can provide more value on most events other than home runs compared to the 3 hitter, this seems like an ideal spot for Castro. He doesn't have the power to hit 3rd, doesn't have the OBP skills to bat 1st or 2nd and isn't going to be the best hitter on too many teams. He will likely be among the 5 best on most teams so this is where we'd put him.

The 6 through 8 hitters should be slotted with the best remaining hitter 6th, next best 7th, and so on. On a great offense it's entirely possible Castro would be batting in one of these 3 spots if the lineup was optimized.

If we're talking about the 2008 Cubs, it's probable that Castro would be hitting lower than 5th. That team had Derrek Lee, Aramis Ramirez, Alfonso Soriano, Geovany Soto and Jim Edmonds that would have filled out the top 5 spots. Then they had Mark DeRosa. The final two spots in 2008 went to Kosuke Fukudome and Ryan Theriot, but we're replacing Theriot with Castro in our imaginary 2008 Cubs lineup. Castro and Fukudome probably would have platooned at the 7th and 8th spots in our optimized imaginary lineup. Castro would have batted 7th against lefties with Fukudome 8th. Against righties it would have been the opposite.

That team was loaded in offensive talent and the 2012 Cubs are not. The 2008 Cubs had offensive talent to share while the 2012 Cubs offense takes to the streets on off days begging for help. The 3 best hitters on this team are Anthony Rizzo, Alfonso Soriano and then you'd have either David DeJesus, Bryan LaHair or Starlin Castro. Those would be the top 5 hitters ignoring any platoons.

DeJesus has no power, but gets on base so he's the obvious leadoff guy. The 2nd and 4th hitters are your two best hitters, but power is more important in the cleanup spot than it is the 2nd spot. The two best hitters are probably Soriano and Rizzo and both have power. Soriano isn't that good at getting on base so I'd put Rizzo 2nd and Soriano 4th. Out of the 3rd and 5th spots, which are roughly equal in value, you'd want the guy with more home runs in the 3rd spot and the guy who hits more singles, doubles and triples batting 5th. LaHair bats 3rd and Castro 5th.

Castro has been misused at the top of the order for some time now and it's nice that he's finally been slotted down where it's more appropriate for him to hit. If the offense gets better he should be moved down further, but for now the 5th spot is about as ideal a spot in the lineup for him on this team as there is.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Rice Cube

    If Brett Jackson ever stops striking out he might be good for the #2 spot…then shift Rizzo to #3 or #4. I think most managers prefer their best hitter in the #3 spot so they get an AB in the first inning no matter what so I doubt they move him out of the #3 spot even though I believe in what “The Book” says.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. TheVan

    How is Barney’s contact compared to Castro? I always think the #2 hitter should be a low strikeout, high contact hitter that can take some pitches to allow the leadoff runner to steal, or make contact to move the runner. I also tend to think pull hitters are poor choices for the #2 spot, which I feel Castro tends to get a little pull happy during some stretches. Then again, there’s a good reason why I’m an accountant and not a baseball coach…

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. TheVan

    I also don’t think Vitters is a good fit for the #2 spot (at least not at this point in his career), but they might be putting him there to see some better pitches.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. josh

    @ josh:
    See, I’m torn. We planted daisies and geraniums around the garden to attract bees. Then crab spiders moved into the flowers and started wrecking shop on the bees (I have a great pic of this, BTW). Now I have wasps and no crap spiders, but the wasps also prey on the bees. So harvesting for supper is always an adventure.

    That’s kind of how it goes. The different arthropods peak at different times, too. There are some hornets that hunt honey bees, yes. Generally the invasive Asian Hornet can be a problem to bee hives. Mud daubers are almost exclusively spider hunters. I’ve actually witnessed this: they land on a spider web and briefly struggle. Then wait. Then they struggle again. The spider comes out to deliver its venom and the wasp grabs it and folds its abdomen under it’s thorax and stings the spider, paralyzing it, then flies away.

    Crab spider v. clearwing moth (bee imitator):
    Killer Flower

    The moth escaped. This tachinid fly wasn’t so lucky:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshuallen/7114349547/

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. mb21

    @ TheVan:
    Barney makes more contact, but I don’t think the number 2 hitter is what you’re describing. That’s more of the old school approach to lineups. Barney isn’t one of the 5 best hitters so he shouldn’t be hitting in the top 5 spots. The number 2 hitter bats often with nobody on base and in such situations OBP is huge. Stolen bases are most valuable in front of singles hitters and most teams don’t stack the top of their lineup with singles hitters. Since OBP is important we’re assuming a good plate approach. Speed is nice in the leadoff spot of course, but it’s not as big a deal as a lot of people think. Ideally your speed guy would bat in the lower part of the order where the singles hitters are.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. mb21

    @ TheVan:
    No, at this point Vitters is not a number 2 hitter and it’s not really even close. He’s a guy who should be hitting 7th or 8th, but he may see fewer hittable pitches in that spot so the Cubs are moving him up. It’s more important for his development to put him in a spot where he’ll see better pitches than it is to put him in a spot that’s more idea for his talent.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. mb21

    @ josh:
    I’m not sure this is either:

    This has nothing to do with talent, as Castro has as much of it as anyone in baseball.

    Of course it has to do with talent and no, Castro does not have as much of it as anyone in baseball. Not even close.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. uncle dave

    @ mb21:
    I’d also make the argument that speed (or, at least, attempted steals) in the one and two holes isn’t necessarily a positive because the cost of a CS goes way up when someone who can hit for power is at bat.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. josh

    @ uncle dave:
    It seems like speed would be more useful lower in the order, as you have to take advantage of the lack of power. You’re trying to make up for the fact that no one can hit well with infield singles and stolen bases.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. uncle dave

    @ Rizzo the Rat:
    Wouldn’t you need a big corner?

    In all seriousness, Vogelbach’s size doesn’t bother me much. He can always go and lose 50 pounds, but I’ll never be able to hit professional pitching. I hope the club is working on his physical issues, it could make a difference.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. mb21

    @ uncle dave:
    I think he lost about 20 pounds after being drafted. The weight only concerns me because being that large at that age is usually not the best sign. That’s true for anyone.

    That said, the guy can hit baseballs and so far he’s hit the shit out of them. I don’t think he can play the outfield. From what I’ve read he’s a poor defensive 1st basemen so playing OF seems out of the question to me. It would be nice if he improved some defensively, but I’m expecting defense similar to Prince Fielder (at best). If all goes well the Cubs could get someone like Prince Fielder and that’s awesome. In all likelihood he is weeded out along the way like most prospects, but the guy can sure hit.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. uncle dave

    @ mb21:
    Sure, it would be better if he didn’t struggle with his weight, but that doesn’t always mean he’s a bad athlete. Guys who are athletic and fat are the exception rather than the rule for sure, but it happens. Since his success to date supposedly has as much to do with his hands and bat speed as it does his approach, I hold out hope that he’s one of those rare cases.

    I think it’s worth keeping in mind that he’s never had to lose weight to be successful, and may never have had anyone help him get his weight under control. He probably ain’t gonna be a center fielder even if he does, but it should help him somewhat. Being overweight really don’t help anything.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. mb21

    @ uncle dave:
    1st basemen usually aren’t very athletic, but I agree with what you’re saying. He’s getting the best nutritional advice he’s ever been given, but his ticket to the big leagues is with the bat, which is true for most 1B. He can be fat and hit (as he is doing now). It’s more of a concern as he ages.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment