Share this Post

Comments

  1. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    Was every single one of F7’s K’s on the splitter? That thing looked nasty, but I didn’t see the game. Hopefully his other pitches were good too.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Suburban kid

    Regarding the convo a couple threads back, I don’t watch the ASG either MB, but I did when I was a kid. And I loved watching great defenders make great plays in those game.

    I’d love to see Darwin barney slicking up the infield for the NL, if I was a little kid. Now, I don’t want anyone from my team diving for balls in a meaningless game. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Rice Cube

    @ Recalcitrant Blogger Nate:

    Strikeouts:

    1: 86 mph splitter
    2: 87 mph splitter
    3: 86 mph splitter
    4: 84 mph splitter (foul bunt)
    5: 86 mph splitter
    6: 86 mph splitter
    7: 82 mph slider
    8: 84 mph slider
    9: 86 mph splitter
    10: 85 mph changeup
    11: 85 mph splitter

    I noted that the slider, changeup and splitter had about the same trajectory so Gameday might be calling the same pitch three different ways. You’d probably have to ask Harry about that one. It seemed like F7 just got to two strikes with his fastball and then unleashed the split/slider/whatever, which you’d think would be predictable but even if the Braves knew what was coming they couldn’t do anything about it.

    Here’s a recap of F7’s Ks…

    http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=22784785&c_id=mlb&topic_id=vtp_jiffy_lube

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. josh

    He’s got five eyes because odd numbers are more terrifying. He has no nose, his tentacles are capable of manipulation, taste, chemoreception, and vibration reception due to the fractal nature of their surface when viewed under a microscope. Since he is a four dimensional monster, he is capable of moving freely through time and can appear to “warp into” any given situation, though spatially he has to be present at that location, even if temporally he is elsewhere. He has to take a bus to Cincinati like everyone else, but he gets to go into the future and use high-speed rail thanks to Obama. Also, what you’re seeing is a 2D representation of the 3D projection of his true self — really more of a tentacle of his body than an actual body, except in 4D. Similar to how a sphere passing through a plane appears to be a circle that grows from a point, then shrinks back down to nothing. If you saw more of his true self, even a glimpse would render you completely insane. He makes Cthulhu look like a kangaroo in a jumpsuit. His true name is unspeakable by human tongues and he was brought here accidentally on a comet that collided with the Earth in the time Before, when the ancient civilization ruled. They failed to survive and all trace of them was wiped from the Earth except a few lingering, mysterious fragments visible only to artists and madmen, all because they failed to invent baseball. He was awakened eons later, not by the crashing feet of the dinosaurs or the sweet melodies of the ephemeral tree people of ancient Gondwana, but by the rousing cheers and then utter humiliation of the Cubs losing the World Series to the Philadelphia Athletics in 1910.

    “Ph’nglui mglw Herper’mo’ter R’gley wgah’nagl fhtagn” (In the house of Wrigley, the Hope Monster lies dreaming)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. josh

    @ WaLi:
    Well, right now caterpillars (cecropia moths). This is my first attempt. I haven’t gotten any to adult stage, so while technically a caterpillar is a moth in larval form, I guess it depends on how technical we’re being as to the correct answer.

    EDIT: my guess as to why we even have the word “Caterpillar” is because it took our ancestors entirely too long to realize that caterpillars turned into to butterflies (spontaneous generation and all that). I mean, you look at a larval fly or a larval beetle and you wouldn’t think “I bet that’s a fly and/or beetle!” Of course, occasionally an insect gets more well-known for its larval form than it’s adult form, such as in the case of the corn rootworm, which is actually a beetle.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Mish

    josh wrote:

    He’s got five eyes because odd numbers are more terrifying. He has no nose, his tentacles are capable of manipulation, taste, chemoreception, and vibration reception due to the fractal nature of their surface when viewed under a microscope. Since he is a four dimensional monster, he is capable of moving freely through time and can appear to “warp into” any given situation, though spatially he has to be present at that location, even if temporally he is elsewhere. He has to take a bus to Cincinati like everyone else, but he gets to go into the future and use high-speed rail thanks to Obama. Also, what you’re seeing is a 2D representation of the 3D projection of his true self — really more of a tentacle of his body than an actual body, except in 4D. Similar to how a sphere passing through a plane appears to be a circle that grows from a point, then shrinks back down to nothing. If you saw more of his true self, even a glimpse would render you completely insane. He makes Cthulhu look like a kangaroo in a jumpsuit. His true name is unspeakable by human tongues and he was brought here accidentally on a comet that collided with the Earth in the time Before, when the ancient civilization ruled. They failed to survive and all trace of them was wiped from the Earth except a few lingering, mysterious fragments visible only to artists and madmen, all because they failed to invent baseball. He was awaken eons later, not by the crashing feet of the dinosaurs or the sweet melodies of the ephemeral tree people of ancient Gondwana, but by the rousing cheers and then utter humiliation of the Cubs losing the World Series to the Philadelphia Athletics in 1910.

    “Ph’nglui mglw Herper’mo’ter R’gley wgah’nagl fhtagn” (In the house of Wrigley, the Hope Monster lies dreaming)

    What is this I don’t even

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. mb21

    @ jtsunami:
    He quit on us. No, he was just done. He’s not even a Cubs fan anymore so I was always surprised by how long he stuck around ACB and then later here at OV. I miss his comments too.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Rice Cube

    josh wrote:

    “Ph’nglui mglw Herper’mo’ter R’gley wgah’nagl fhtagn” (In the house of Wrigley, the Hope Monster lies dreaming)

    I was always fond of “GLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR LARBUDDY” (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. mb21

    @ josh:
    They’re huge. I can’t think of a bigger baseball blog. Congrats on getting linked there, Josh. That’s almost as impressive as ESPN. Seriously.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. Mish

    @ josh:
    I actually have been visiting that site for ages, before I stumbled upon other saber-y sites. The commenters/writers have a SABR bent, but the main draw is people posting (usually dumb) articles from the mainstream press and skewering them.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. mb21

    It’s too bad berselius can’t win the OV over/under contest because he’s kicking ass right now. I’ve only tallied the mid-season totals for the batters and I’m not including Jackson or Rizzo as we didn’t expect them to get much PT before the midway point. ACT and Mark Ammer are next highest after berselius. Still have all the pitchers to total. I’ll make a post with these totals later today.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Berselius

    @ mb21:

    I’m interested to see what I picked, considering I don’t even remember this contest (dying laughing). No wonder all the other blogs continuously blast this one for being complete shit

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. mb21

    I’ll also say that we didn’t think much of Paul Maholm entering this season and we were very high on Darwin Barney. Both turned out to be accurate. We’re smrt.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. Rice Cube

    @ Berselius:
    Well you’re the math whiz, you explain! (dying laughing)

    My first thought was that the hypotenuse of the largest triangle wasn’t in line with the smaller triangle but that’s probably not right.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment